At the edge of
war: Threats to the economy
The
economy is threatened by another war. Unlike during the Second World
War and the Korean War years, when the Sri Lankan economy benefited,
this war threatens the economy in many different ways. It is to
the credit of the government that it is taking steps to meet the
situation as the war clouds gather. How effective these would be
remains to be seen.
The unfavourable
economic forces it leashes can hardly be overcome. All that a government
could do is to reduce the adverse impacts especially on the vulnerable
sections of the population.
The taming
of prices is inherently a difficult, if not impossible task.
A prolonged
war would indeed ruin the economy. If the war is brief, like the
previous Gulf war, then there may be some chance of an economic
revival after a lapse of about six months.
The scars of
the war on the Sri Lankan economy would remain. It comes at a time
when the economy is struggling to recover. It is another set back
to the economy.
It was barely
a month ago that we reminded readers of this column the various
ways in which the country could be affected by a war. The most serious
impact on the economy would be through a rise in oil prices.
Already the
unstable situation has resulted in crude oil prices shooting up.
In the worst case scenario of Iraq burning the oil wells in retaliation
of an American attack, the increase in oil prices could be horrendous.
Some knowledgeable sources predict it to rise up to US$ 80 per barrel
from the current level in the thirties.
Even a price
rise to US 60 would be an economic disaster. In 2001 we expended
US $ 731 million on the import of oil. This was about 12 per cent
of our import values and 15 per cent of export earnings of that
year. This was more than the value of our exports of tea (US$ 690)
in 2001.
If prices were
to double-a very real possibility- then our oil imports would cost
us as much as US $ 1500 million, absorbing perhaps a third of our
export earnings.
If export earnings
too dip, as most likely, then it would be an unbearable burden.
The government is turning to South East Asian suppliers rather than
the traditional Middle Eastern markets to ensure oil supplies.
This is more
likely to help us obtain needed supplies of oil rather than reduce
the cost, as the prices of oil irrespective of the suppliers would
rise to international levels.
The increase
in oil prices would seriously affect our trade balance and leave
a serious dent in our balance of payments. The IMF is likely to
help in the event of a balance of payments crisis. Yet the debt
adds to our already high debt burden.
The higher
costs of production of our industrial exports, coupled with decreased
demand for them would decrease export earnings at the very time
when import costs rise.
The demand
for most of our industrial exports would decline for many reasons
such as a decline in consumer spending, disruption of shipping and
higher costs of freight. The tea export market is also likely to
be affected with a decreased demand from the affected Middle Eastern
countries.
Middle East
remittances that are an important contribution to the balance of
payments would suffer a serious setback.
This could
be both immediate and for several years, till some of the Middle
Eastern economies recover. These remittances are larger than our
earnings from all our agricultural exports, tea, rubber coconut
and other export crops.
Fortunately,
not all the remittances come from the Middle East and some Middle
Eastern countries may be less affected. The other conventional concern
lies in war disrupting food imports as well as an increase in prices
of essential food imports like wheat, sugar and milk.
Fortunately,
this year's Maha harvest, due shortly, is expected to be a bumper
harvest and the year's rice production is expected to exceed the
domestic rice requirements. Yet we do depend heavily on wheat imports
that have grown over the years to meet an increasing domestic consumption
of wheat flour products. In this case too new purchases are likely
to cost higher prices. Hopefully the stocks of wheat would be adequate
to tide over the war period.
There could
be domestic shortages, some of which would be orchestrated by traders
for their benefit. These would be particularly with respect to rice,
wheat, sugar, milk and other essential foods. It is here then state
interventions could help.
In such a crisis
situation a shift in consumption to other domestic foods like manioc,
breadfruit, other grains and pulses could compensate to some extent
the shortfall in imported food supplies and even more reduce the
costs of food.
The impact
of the impending unjust war can be frightful in as far as the economy
is concerned. Yet it would be slight in comparison to the horrible
human misery in several parts of the world.
|