Techno Page
- By Harendra Alwis
Life
in the fast lane
Time... or space? Each generation seems to walk through
this earth at an ever faster speed. Change swoops over us as always
and we follow like rats captivated by the music of a magical pipe.
We're speeding up; our lives are speeding up with the acceleration
of technology; our arts and entertainment is speeding up with broadband
Internet and cable TV and the pace of discovery and change itself
is speeding up. Do we seek to understand what is going on? Do we
care? Time, which has no beginning or end (and which I am made to
believe is not continuous but rather like matter, is made up of
'quanta' of smallest units that could be measured) passes us by
but do we seek to understand how it works? We double the speed of
our computers in a matter of months but we do not know what time
is. If we don't understand time, will we become its victims?
Do you think
faster and more powerful computers will be the answer to the problems
we seek to solve? If so, how fast must they be? If not, what is
it that we are searching for? Some believe that neurosciences hold
the key to intelligent computers while others put their money on
genetics. Yet others are looking at quantum mechanics. Have you
got any ideas of your own? Write into technopage_lk@yahoo.com
Quantum Computers
- Obstacles and research
Quantum information processing and quantum computing have made
numerous promising advancements since their conception. However,
a few potentially large obstacles still remain that prevent us from
building a quantum computer that can rival today's modern digital
computer. Among these difficulties, decoherence, and hardware architecture
are probably the most formidable.
Decoherence
is the tendency of a quantum computer to decay from a given quantum
state into an incoherent state as it interacts, or entangles, with
the state of the environment. These interactions between the environment
and qubits are unavoidable, and induce the breakdown of information
stored in the quantum computer, and thus errors in computation.
Before any quantum computer is capable of solving hard problems,
research must devise a way to maintain and minimize decoherence.
Thanks to the theory of quantum error correction small scale quantum
computers have been built and the prospects of large quantum computers
are looking up. Currently, research is underway to discover methods
for battling the destructive effects of decoherence.
Presently,
only a few of the benefits of quantum information processing and
quantum computing are readily obvious, but before more possibilities
are uncovered theory must be put to the test. In order to do this,
devices capable of quantum computation must be constructed. Quantum
computing hardware is, however, still in its infancy, even at research
level. As a result of several significant experiments, nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) has become the most popular component in quantum
hardware architecture. In 1999, physicists at Los Alamos National
Laboratory and MIT constructed the first experimental demonstrations
of a quantum computer using NMR technology. To date, designs have
involved ion traps, optical cavities, quantum dots, Josephson Junctions
and NMR. Though these devices have had mild successes in performing
interesting experiments, the technologies each have serious limitations.
The future of quantum computer hardware architecture is likely to
be very different from what we know today; however, the current
research has helped to provide insight as to what obstacles the
future will hold for these devices.
At present,
quantum computers and quantum information technology remains in
its formative stage. At this very moment obstacles are being surmounted
that will provide the knowledge needed to thrust quantum computers
up to their rightful position as the fastest computational machines
in existence. Promising progress has been made and nearing a point
now where we may have the tools required to build a computer robust
enough to adequately withstand the effects of decoherence. Quantum
hardware, on the other hand, remains an emerging field, but the
work done thus far suggests that it will only be a matter of time
before we have devices large enough to test Shor's, Grover's and
other quantum algorithms. Thereby, quantum computers will emerge
as the superior computational devices at the very least, and perhaps
one day make today's modern computer obsolete. Quantum computation
has its origins in highly specialized fields of theoretical physics,
but its future undoubtedly lies in the profound effect it will have
on the lives of all of us.
This still
young field of quantum information processing and quantum computation
has already achieved a multitude of exciting and surprising insights
- both in the foundations of quantum mechanics and its applications
to problems of communication and computation. With many dedicated
groups now working in this area, more surprises and breakthroughs
are to be expected. Earlier in most universities research on quantum
computing was carried out by their physics divisions but now the
progress is such that, most of these universities have independent
divisions to deal with quantum computing, quantum optics etc. Also
a new journal, "Quantum Information and Computation",
dedicated to quantum information processing has been formed to report
on new developments in this field.
Sent in by
Nuwan Karunaratne
10.20 GHz Intel
'Nehalem' by 2005?
The Internet is abuzz with gossip about Intel's future plans for
their upcoming desktop processors up until the year 2005.
The first of
these processors is rumoured to be the Prescott-core CPU, which
could debut by the end of this year at 5.20GHz with an 800 MHz system
bus. Following the Prescott is the Tejas-core CPU, lined up for
arrival by the end of 2004 at 5.60GHz using a 1066 MHz system bus.
The speed step increments planned for the Tejas will be 6GHz, 6.40GHz,
6.80GHz, 7.20GHz, 7.60GHz, 7GHz, 8.40GHz, 8.80GHz and finally 9.20GHz.
By 2005, Intel
hopes to have their 9.60GHz Nehalem-core processor ready. With luck,
they should be able to introduce a 10.20GHz version of the processor
featuring a 1200MHz front side bus in the same year.
I-news
|