Look,
this is the society we live in
By Marisa
de Silva
The 'Mirror Making Factory', a production directed by Ruwanthie
De Chickera, is set to go on the boards at the Lionel Wendt Theatre
on March 21 and 22.
Ruwanthie De
Chickera is known in theatrical circles as a talented young playwright
but just who are these people, who will bring the 'Mirror Making
Factory' (MMF) to life? Who acts as the students, the doctors, the
various functions of the machine, the MMF graduates, the rejects
and how do they see this 'very different' play?
A cross-section
is how one would best describe the cast of the MMF; a cross section
of young and older people from all races, religions, backgrounds
and classes. It could easily be said, that there has been no play
in recent times that has featured such a diverse group of actors.
It seems quite evident that the experience gained, both theatrically
and on a personal level, has enriched their lives.
"Even
in our every day life, we each have a role to play, so the most
important thing is to learn how best to play it," says Omar,
a member of the cast. Words of wisdom indeed but, how many of us
can actually live up to this ideal? People should learn the right
way to act in normal circumstances, instead of simply reacting to
them because that's where the problem lies, he says.
"Through
drama, it's possible to learn this, thus helping people to live
better lives. Taking part in this play has been a novel experience
as it gets me away from the regular, dreary routine, a welcome break
from the 'rat race'. It has enriched me and helped in more ways
than I can imagine.
"What
I find most appealing in this sort of production is that everyone
works with each other devoid of the boundaries that are so apparent
in the 'real world," says Ruwan Fernando. The distinct
line created by society between the 'so called' normal and the abnormal
disappears, leaving only talent and the use of it to its maximum
potential. This is one of the most important things in taking part
in plays of this nature, he says.
It's futile
taking part in this sort of production if you don't take anything
back with you that'll open both your eyes and mind, adds Ruwan.
"Personally, I have gained a lot from this whole experience
and will put into action all I've learnt from here.
"My role
depicts the epitome of 'normalcy'. I'm the perfect citizen. A mirror
reflection of every graduate of the Modern Man Foundation,"
says Gihan De Chickera proudly. It's the first time ever that he's
taken part in a bilingual play. Also the first time he's had his
end of semester exams on simultaneously. "My role is used to
laugh at some of the strange behaviour of the 'normal' people in
our society."
"It's
my first time taking part in a drama of any sort," says Eranga
Boteju, who plays the role of a student. How the drama brings out
various social truths on how society behaves towards specific sectors
of our community is one of the unique aspects of this play. How
society accepts only those who conform and rejects all those who
don't, too is brought out quite effectively through certain characters
in the play, he adds.
It's definitely
not her first time on stage, says Chamila Peiris, but no matter
how many times she acts in productions of this kind, she just can't
seem to get enough. She portrays someone who opts to play all the
right cards to get to the top. She wants to say exactly what the
interview panel wants to hear so that she'll get to where she wants,
no matter what the odds are. "This is human nature for you,"
she says.
This type of
production is more challenging and difficult but at the same time
more rewarding, says Keshan Thalgahagoda, an honours graduate turned
Tour Guide, of the MMF.
The 'Mirror
Making Factory' is simple, direct and to the point. At the same
time, its hidden meaning will strike at the viewer's conscience.
Because, like
it or not, we are of this entity called society, that drives many
who belong to this very same entity, to isolation and rejection.
Maybe the MMF will help you search your soul.
Sesha's
power of love with words
Sri Lankan writer
Sesha Samarajiwa has won first prizes in two prestigious literary
competitions in Australia.
The
Death of a Skywalker
Aerial
ropeways connecting the coconut
palms criss-cross the vast plantation.
High above the ground
Where the long green leaves fan out
clusters of coconuts
ooze juice into bamboo canisters.
Each dawn the toddy tapper sets out
whipcord-sinewed brown man
shimmies up the trunk of a tree
in a style that would shame a monkey
and goes skywalking from tree to tree.
Calloused bare feet clamping the tree trunk,
gulping a mug of toddy - a tonic,
his wife's warning briefly echoing:
Be very careful today;
I heard the ulama bird - a bad omen.
Clinging to branches way up high,
surefoooted,
harvesting the potent sap
to make arrack to
satiate his countrymen's craving
and make the mudalali rich
he goes skywalking from tree to tree.
Fifty trees to go before the morn is gone,
for every tree a rupee
needing 50 to keep the wolf at bay
he goes skywalking from tree to tree.
His curved knife making expert incisions
on another cluster of coconuts
with practised ease,
priming nuts for tomorrow's spree
he goes skywalking from tree to tree.
Moving fast
traipsing the ropewalk
tripping the light fandango
he goes skywaIking from tree to tree.
Vessel near full
Almost done
Sun a scorcher
Time to descend.
Then sudden death comes crawling
and the scorpion stings him:
in agony his feet betray him,
losing his footing,
losing his grip,
Skywalker comes crashing down
down
down
Down 50 steep feet.
The wind begins howling like
the ulama bird screeching
alcoholic harvest scattering
evaporating in the blazing sun
as the earth comes racing up to meet him.
Skywalker is down
he's down
on the ground, a mangled mess of flesh and bone,
a moment ago had been
skywallkng from tree to tree.
|
The Death of
a Skywalker won first prize in the poetry competition, and two other
poems, City of Concrete Erections and A Question of Zen, won commendations
in the poetry competition organised by the Melbourne University
Post Graduate Review. In a separate essay competition, Sesha's satire
Eat your way to better sex garnered the first prize, while his humorous
essay, In praise of the chilli, won a commendation.
Commenting
on behalf of the judging panel on his contributions, editor Vyvyan
Cayley said: "All your submissions were excellent and we had
a hard time selecting the best from among them. You offer a wide
repertoire of themes and styles with admirable economy of expression
to give your audience a wonderful aestheticexperience. Your work
is memorable, powerful and thought provoking. Congratulations on
winning first prize in both our competitions."
Meanwhile,
the latest issue of the respected Australian literary journal, anti
THESIS, has published another of his poems. The introductory remarks
of the issue, which dealt with the theme of transition, states:
"Sesha Samarajiwa shows how transit in the shadow of colonialism
requires the sidelining of his family and cultural heritage and
the identity which is embedded in it. In his poem, 'What's in a
Name?' he is forced to 'cut his name down to size'."
Sesha has been
invited to read his poetry at a number of literary events. His poem
City of Concrete Erections, specially composed for the Hong Kong
Fringe Festival, won high praise.
"I have
been in love with words as long as I can remember," says Sesha.
"As a little boy growing up in a lovely little house on a hill
in Peradeniya, I used to spend hours just touching and smelling
the books in my father's library. I spent many delightful moments
with my father who used to read me stories and, more often, we would
invent stories together.
"We used
to go to the theatre often - Sinhabahu, Maname and Hunu
Wataye Kathawa. The first movie I saw was Lester James Peiris's
Rekawa, which was screened in a giant tent. Many decades later,
I had the privilege of meeting and writing about the great auteur.
"I was
also in the habit of stealing my father's prized fountain pens.
One of his favourite photographs of me shows a chubby two-year-old
clasping his Parker. Another shows a bare-bottomed me fiddling with
the tuning knob of our PYE radio, which gave me endless hours of
fascination.
"I learnt
early the power and magic of the spoken and written word."
Sesha, who
also writes in his mother tongue, considers the late Colin De Silva,
the author of the international blockbuster 'Sinhala' quartet, to
be his hero."I had the great privilege of becoming Colin's
friend. He was a tremendously versatile talent. He was the last
of the Sinhala Lions. In fact, that was the title of a profile I
wrote about him for Serendib."
Sesha was a
pioneer editor of the then Airlanka's award-winning inflight magazine,
Serendib, to which he contributed a range of articles.
Eat
your way to better sex
Sexologists
have long known that there's a connection between eating and sex.
Both activities satisfy appetites, fill two powerful needs. Gluttony
is a known substitute for sexual starvation.
I have a theory
about eating and sex, a theory worthy of a Freud or a Foucault,
albeit a blatantly essentialist one. My theory, in a nutshell, is
this; those who eat with their fingers enjoy sex much more than
those who eat with tools.
I categorise
the human race into three distinct types: those who eat with metallic
implements like knives and forks; those who use sticks; and those
who use their fingers. (That's my hypothesis.) For the latter the
food is always finger-licking good or finger-non-licking bad.
The first variety
of people generally inhabit the Northern Hemisphere. Those who do
so now in the Southern Hemisphere originally came from northern
climes.
The stick eaters
inhabit, in the main, North-east Asia. The finger-eating people
inhabit the Middle East, South and South-east Asia, Africa, South
America and many Pacific and South Sea islands.
Those who use
steel implements - and sometimes in a hurry plastic ones - did not
always use such tools.
In fact, the
custom came into vogue in the European middle ages. Indeed an English
queen deplored the new fashion creeping in from France, saying:
"Heaven forbid! If God had intended man (I'm sure she was using
the generic term here) to eat with knives and forks, he (I'm sure
she believed the deity is male) would not have given people fingers,
thank God!"
So knives and
forks were banned from the royal table during this queen's reign.
The courtiers literally pitched into their food with gusto, tearing
juicy chunks of meat with their teeth, ripping off chunks of bread
to scoop up the gravy, and generally having a highly sensuous culinary
experience.
But the knife-and-fork-fad
which originated in France, caught on in Europe.
On the heels
of this absurd fad came the reign of the puritans, with their sterile
attitude towards life's pleasures. The repressed Victorian era saw
women suffering the masochistic custom of enslaving their feminine
assets within bondage cages to pretend they did not exist. Thus
they repressed their sensuality.
Soon, the puritans
of the cold, northern climes colonised the sensual south where native
elites began to ape their customs. The finger-eating sensualists
of the colonised regions were told that everything sensual was bad
for them.
The colonisers
spread the repression, waging a crusade against sensuality. They
introduced the missionary position and proscribed the Kama Sutra.
One colonial governor of India even planned to raze to the ground
the temples of Khajuraho (humankind's ultimate ode to sensuality),
declaring them a barbaric affront to "decency and civilised
norms".
Such prudishness,
which has already systematically vanquished pagan-sensual Europe
with sustained raids, witch-hunts and brainwashing on a massive
scale, was repeated in the colonies. Some caved in; others continued
to touch the objects of their culinary pleasure.
Now, those
who use sticks to eat have been doing it with sticks for a very
long time. On first encountering the custom one would think it an
amazing feat of Oriental dexterity. But with practice anyone can
master the use of chopsticks.
Still, the
food one eats with chopsticks tends to be bland, lacks zest. But
that's not the point. The point is that stick eaters also distance
themselves from their food by using sticks instead of their hands.
To come to
the crux of my theory, any couple who have made love with a condom
between them can tell the difference between it and the real thing.
Imagine eating a banana with the peel on. Or a lolly with the wrapper
on. Likewise with food.
It all comes
down to touch: more precisely, those who touch and those who distance
themselves from their objects of desire. Those who eat with utensils
can never experience the exquisite pleasure of touching, feeling,
caressing the food you eventually raise to your lips to be placed
on your tongue to be savoured with a slurp and a burp. Total pleasure
demands the stimulation of all five senses: sight, sound, smell,
taste - and touch. So those who eat with their fingers delight in
a total sensory experience, because the consummation of the pleasurable
act of eating begins with smell and sight and culminates in the
titillation of the taste buds.
Tool-users,
on the other hand, are quite different from the touch-people of
the warmer climes of the planet.
As with other
forms of life's activities, the former tend to rely too much on
gadgets to accomplish things - a form of touch aversion. These are
the sort of people who don't like to get their hands sticky, so
to speak.
Have you seen
an Arab eat? Or an Indian? Or an African?A Tongan? Exotic dishes
garnished with multicoloured leaves, red-hot chilli peppers, spiced
with.... well, spices; colours, aromas and sights to inflame the
senses. Imagine an Indian banquet with dishes of delight inviting
to be fondled, caressed, squeezed, nibbled and savoured.
Ama Rhasa, the
Food of the Gods! To eat such food with tools would be to do injustice
to a potent element of human sensuality - touch. Indeed, it would
be an affront to the cook to prudishly pick at such food with tools,
rendering it insipid, lacklustre, demeaned.
When friends
not accustomed to eating with their fingers drop in for a meal at
my place, I watch them.
Some are visibly
repelled by our custom of breaking a hot naan or roti, dipping it
into a succulent dish to scoop it up and transport it to our mouths
with our fingers. (How else can you eat this food, anyway?) Their
look betrays their sterile attitude towards sex; those who wade
in with all ten fingers must be the sensualists or those with that
potential.
It's all about
how we go about satisfying two basic needs which also delight our
senses. Eating is like making love. Take my advice: touch that morsel
of delight and feel the difference.
|