Realities of a make-believe booming economy
By The Economist
The Sri Lankan economy that was battered for two decades by internal
war has had the misfortune of facing the external shocks of the
Iraqi war after a year of cessation of hostilities.
It
would be difficult to determine whether the internal shock or the
external shock has had a more damaging effect on the economy. What
is clear is that each of these has a very serious impact on the
country's economic performance. All the pious aspirations of becoming
an NIC, reaching a sustained economic growth of 7 per cent or more
and such like aspirations have remained unattained.
In the previous
weeks this column discussed the serious adverse effect of the war
on the economy. At the time of writing, there are expectations of
an end to the war. It is these expectations that have revived the
market for low grown teas and caused a dip in international oil
prices. We must certainly hope that the international economic scenario
is about to change and that conditions hospitable to the Sri Lankan
economy would emerge.
The fact is
that the Sri Lankan economy was in a weak state even before the
war began. The war set back any prospect of a recovery. When the
UNF took over the government, it kept repeating about the parlous
condition of the economy, particularly the negative growth of the
economy in 2001 and the massive public debt. Later it has been a
story about the economic recovery. No doubt there was an improvement
in the economy in the latter half of 2002.The economy is expected
to have grown by 3 per cent in 2002 compared to the 1.4 per cent
the previous year.
True, exports
recovered in the latter part of last year. Even the statistics for
January this year confirm an export growth compared to that of the
previous January. The moot question, however, is whether the fundamentals
of the economy have registered a significant improvement.
Last week we
pointed out that despite the improved export performance, we incurred
a large trade deficit of US$ 1.4 million. An export growth of 11
per cent in January has not helped the cause of the trade balance.
The deficit was as large as US$ 150 million for the single month.
This forebodes a much larger deficit this year especially as exports
are likely to suffer owing to global conditions.
The public debt
that was Rs. 1,450,000 million at the end of 200l has risen to around
Rs.1, 700,000 million by the end of 2002. Indications are that unemployment
has increased to about 10 per cent. Though last year's rate of inflation
was lower, prices rose sharply at the end of the year with many
utilities rising in cost and causing a crushing burden on the bulk
of the population.
While all this
is happening, the effort is to project a happy picture of the economy.
What we wish to focus on are not only the factual position of the
economy, but the insensitivity to, and lack of realisation of, the
critical state of the economy. Sri Lanka's political culture, it
appears, is not one that can make the leadership call for "blood,
sweat and tears."
Consequently,
we continue to increase our debt and pass on the burdens to the
future, sell public assets to ease the difficulties temporarily,
seek more and more foreign aid and loans and be quite satisfied
with obtaining more foreign assistance. The global situation was
one that required a tightening of the belts but in the current political
situation all that the government can do is to promise more relief.
In the dire
economic conditions that we find ourselves, we continue to spend
more than we earn. Non-food consumer imports have increased by 34
per cent, with motorcar imports increasing by 134 per cent in January.
And that in a country where large stocks of vehicles line the streets
not only in Colombo, but the streets of Negombo, Kandy and other
cities. In a situation of higher energy costs, we do not hear any
exhortations to conserve electricity and fuel consumption
Instead we
light our streets to celebrate festivals. Ministers are girdling
the globe for all sorts of reasons. We live in a make believe booming
economy, while the real economy continues to slide. Do we have the
correct approach to regain Sri Lanka? |