The cover up of a Tiger build up in Trincomalee
Tiger
guerrilla leaders lining up after a pasing out parade in a
newly set up camp in the Trincomalee district. |
Peace talks
between the UNF Government and Tiger guerrillas may remain suspended
since April, this year, but Sri Lanka's ethnic conflict continues
to echo more than usual in many world capitals.
In the French
capital of Paris, leader of the Political Wing of Liberation Tigers
of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) S.P Tamilselvan met with "constitutional
affairs" delegates to discuss their response to the UNF's proposal
for an Interim Administration. In the neighbouring United Kingdom's
capital of London, in an unexpected development, LTTE Chief Negotiator,
Anton Balasingham kept himself out. The event was held in Paris
to facilitate his participation, despite his reported illness, since
it was less than an hour's flying time from London.
Whilst in London,
I learnt Mr. Balasingham kept himself virtually incommunicado. Though
he was at home, an answering machine took care of his telephone
calls. "He was in no way associated with the deliberations,"
said a source in London familiar with his routine.
Needless to
say this raises fresh questions. Earlier, reasons of reportedly
failing health ruled out his visits from London to Wanni for consultations
with LTTE leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran and restricted his role
to what was described as a "resource person." Yet, he
was in the loop. And now, has he ceased to be that too? Sources
close to the high profile guerrilla ideologue, who has won plaudits
from his UNF negotiating counterparts for his moderation and pleasing
ways, seem to think so.
The matter
gains added significance, according to same sources, in view of
his reluctance to entertain at home even the London based guerrilla
leaders during the period of Paris talks. Does that mean a seasoned
moderate guerrilla chief negotiator will now give way to a hard
line, tough talking bargainer? A case of not only a changing phase
of future peace talks but also one of changing faces.
In the breathtakingly
picturesque Norwegian capital of Oslo, which I visited, most were
taking advantage of the exceptionally good summer. Those at the
Foreign Ministry were busy with annual consultations of the country's
envoy's abroad. For those in the political establishment there was
another pre-occupation - the local government elections. The event
is keenly fought out by rival political parties. The outcome brings
to the fore future national leaders who guide the destinies of a
nation of four and half million people.
A few days
ago, the UNF Government's Minister for Community Development, Periyasamy
Chandrasekeran, took the Norwegian Government by surprise. On a
visit to Oslo, he appeared on an election platform of the opposition
Labour Party to appeal to Tamils in Norway to vote for LTTE's Rajah
Balasingham alias Baskaran. He is contesting on the Labour Party
ticket for the Oslo Municipality.
At a rally
organised by the Norway Tamil Sangam, the sponsors of Mr. Chandrasekeran's
visit, the UNF Minister sat next to Labour Party leader and former
Norwegian Prime Minister, Jens Stoltenberg. It was during his tenure
that Norway officially nominated Erik Solheim to facilitate the
peace process. Mr. Chandrasekeran told the gathering Tiger leader
Velupillai Prabhakaran took the correct path by responding with
violence against what he called a systematic suppression of Tamils
by the Sinhala majority.
Forty six year
old Mr. Chandrasekeran, leader for the Up Country People's Front,
has been a staunch campaigner for a separate administrative unit
in the hill country plantation sector. He was detained during the
previous UNP Government under the Prevention of Terrorism Act but
was later cleared by courts.
He told the
rally that Tamil voters in Oslo should vote for Mr. Balasingham
to enable him to serve the community better. He showered praise
on Mr. Prabhakaran for placing Tamils on the world map and declared
he (the LTTE leader) certainly knew how to communicate with the
gun.
Mr. Chandrasekeran's
appeal to Norwegian Tamils came amidst poll survey predictions that
the majority of moderate electors with Asian, African and Latin
American descent would vote Social Left Party. Special Envoy Erik
Solheim, is a front line leader of this party.
Mr. Solheim
and State Secretary for Foreign Affairs, Vidar Helgesson made clear
in the polls campaign that their parties did not have any truck
with Mr. Balasingham. Mr. Solheim also made the point during visits
to Tamil households seeking their support for his party.
Mr. Helgesson
is from the Conservative Party who together with the Christian Democrats
and the Liberal Party forms the coalition government of Prime Minister
Kjell Bondevik. The latter is from the Christian Democrats whilst
Foreign Minister, Jan Peterson, like his deputy, is from the Conservative
Party. It must be emphasised that though they belong to different
political parties, they support each other in peace facilitation
efforts made by Norway.
Mr. Chandrasekeran
also called on both Mr. Helgesson and Mr. Solheim. They discussed
matters relating to the peace process. He also met LTTE representatives
in Norway to discuss strategies of his own party and how it could
extend support to Tiger guerrillas. Though he planned to return
to Sri Lanka after the Oslo visit, he changed his itinerary and
flew to Paris where he met LTTE representatives there.
Mr. Balasingham
who sought asylum after arriving in Norway is a staunch supporter
of the LTTE. He was a member of the LTTE Political Committee that
visited Scandinavian countries in March/April this year. According
to documents with the SCOPP (Secretariat Co-ordinating the Peace
Process), he is one of three members of LTTE's Political Committee
assigned to study the federal system. He was also the leader of
the LTTE team in Norway cleared by authorities in Oslo to liaise
with Tiger guerrilla delegation attending the Oslo peace talks in
November 2002.
In an interview
with Aftenposten, one of Norway's oldest and leading national language
newspapers, Mr. Balasingham denied he was a member of the LTTE.
"I am only a member of the Tamil Co-operation Council (TCC),
which is actively promoting the cause of self-governance for Tamils,"
he was quoted as saying. However, the local leader of the Tamil
Rehabilitation Organisation (TRO), Thurairajah Sangaran, when questioned
by Aftenposten, admitted the TCC is raising funds for the LTTE.
The Secretary
of the Labour Party in Oslo, Jan Behler was quoted by Aftenposten
as saying "Balasingham assured us he is not a member of the
LTTE and that he is not collecting money for the Tamil Tigers. He
just sympathises with their cause. Hence, his alleged links are
not a problem for us."
The outcome
of the Oslo Municipality polls on September 15 nothwithstanding,
State Secretary Helgesson and Special Envoy Solheim will arrive
in Colombo next week on a three day visit. It is said to focus on
logistical and other matters after the guerrilla response to UNF's
proposals are received. This response is not likely during the duo's
stay in Colombo.
During their
stay, they are expected to discuss with both the UNF and LTTE leaders
the venue for the next round of peace talks. Among the locations
that are available for consideration, it is learnt, are Geneva,
Paris, Oslo, Rome, Berlin and of course Bangkok. They are also expected
to take up with guerrilla leaders complaints of killings of security
forces informants as well as the Manirasakulam (Kuranku Paanchan
Kulam) LTTE camp, which the SLMM (Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission)
has determined is in Government held territory. The Norwegian facilitators
are said to be keen to ensure a more effective and credible role
for the SLMM to enable future rounds of talks to take place in a
less contentious atmosphere.
The Sunday
Times learns that a comprehensive response from the LTTE will be
made available to Norwegian facilitators (for onward transmission
to UNF leadership) by the end of this month, possibly on September
25. It would thus have to await the return to Sri Lanka of Prime
Minister, Ranil Wickremasinghe, who is due in New York to address
the United Nations General Assembly. He is expected to return on
September 29.
Both UNF Government
and LTTE representatives were in the Swiss town of Berne studying
the federal system and the mechanisms of power sharing. Bernard
Goonetilleke, who is due to assume duties as Foreign Secretary and
head of LTTE's Peace secretariat, Prabhagaran alias Pulithevan were
involved in the exercise. This is pursuant to the Oslo peace talks
in November, last year, where the LTTE declared its willingness
to consider a federal alternative to a separate state.
Mr. Pulithevan
returned to Colombo yesterday accompanied by two female colleagues.
As usual, his baggage contained 14 packages. Alarm bells began to
ring over what they contained. Orders went down from the highest
levels to conduct a thorough check on what they contained. Both
Gamini Abeyratne, Director (Operations) at the Bandaranaike International
Airport and Wing Commander Vijitha Gunaratne, the senior Air Force
officer in charge were present as x-ray machines scanned the packages.
They were said
to contain personal items including non fat yoghurt. The two also
ensured a Customs declaration was made and the packages were checked
by the Bomb Disposal Squad. The LTTE trio were later air lifted
by Air Force helicopter to the Wanni. This was after Mr. Pulithevan
expressed reluctance to travel by road with armed escort.
According to
credible reports from Wanni, the LTTE response will have both good
and bad news for the UNF. The good news is that the proposals will
be within the confines of a united Sri Lanka. The bad news - there
will be a host of guerrilla demands including the right for an interim
administrative mechanism they will inherit to generate their own
revenue, recognition for their "land, sea and police forces,"
right to land use in the areas they hold and recognition for their
own "judicial and administrative systems."
A preamble
in the LTTE response, according to these reports, will set out the
"background and reasons" why the demands are being made
incorporating two power centres, one in Colombo and another in the
Wanni. Hence, the LTTE response will see the emergence of core issues.
The question then would be how much a government could concede and
whether that would satisfy the LTTE. Their response in the form
of a comprehensive set of proposals is for the first time in the
history of the conflict.
In fact how
crucial this would be was underscored last week by Premier Wickremasinghe
when he addressed a news conference in the Malaysian capital of
Kuala Lumpur. He said the peace talks had reached a serious stage
where substantial issues would have to be discussed.
In the United
States capital of Washington D.C, these developments have come under
close scrutiny by the George W. Bush administration. This is because
the State Department's list of proscribed terrorist organisations
comes up for review in the first week of October. The US has repeatedly
urged the LTTE to renounce violence to exclude them from proscription.
On the other hand, the US which has expressed full support for the
Government's peace efforts wants to refrain from any action that
would affect the process. In this backdrop, a re-iteration of the
US demand to the LTTE to renounce violence is not being ruled out.
It was only
last Thursday United States marked the second anniversary of the
terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York and the
Pentagon in Washington. Hijackers flew aircraft there and to a field
in Pennsylvania. The unprecedented human tragedy it caused saw the
US launch its "war on terror" and declare a new philosophy
- "you are with us, or against us."
Unfortunately
it was not just the "GI Joes" who launched this war on
terror in some parts of the globe. Whether this happened in other
parts of the world, or for that matter in Asia, is not clear. But
there were the odd few in Colombo who recklessly followed that approach
even in the field of diplomacy - a striking contrast with their
colleagues of the past whose quest to win friends and influence
people are still being talked of.
The philosophy
of "you are with us, or against us," sad enough, extended
even to those charged with communications and public relations exercises.
Their conduct reminded one of the pre-independence era in Ceylon
(as Sri Lanka was then known), when our colonial masters dealt with
the locals solely through their sycophantic Aratchis and Vidanes.
In similar fashion, these information experts remained elusive and
used only their domestic staff to deal with the locals. Must one
speak of bruising good relations when the task is to build them?
Now that Charlotte
Beers is no longer in that job in the State Department in Washington,
whoever becomes Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public
Affairs, sure has a case to go into. Only such a person can ascertain
whether the new attitudes are solely for small natives in Sri Lanka
or are a sign that is endemic of the new image the world's only
remaining super power is acquiring in the Third World.
However, one
thing salutary in this regard comes in the form of the new US Ambassador
designate to Sri Lanka, Jeffrey J. Lunstead and his deputy, James
Entwistle. Some of the local dignitaries who received introductory
calls on them speak of an express commitment by the duo to deal
with all arms of the Government and to reach out to the people of
Sri Lanka.
In this backdrop,
the controversy between the UNF Government and the People's Alliance
over threats posed to the strategic Trincomalee port by the LTTE
rose to newer heights this week. Government's chief peace negotiator
and spokesman, Prof. G.L. Peiris denied that new guerrilla camps
have come up to encircle Trincomalee. "Apart from Manirasakulam
(Kuranku Paanchan Kulam), in all other cases the camps were in existence
before the Ceasefire Agreement was signed or it was set up not in
areas dominated by the Government of Sri Lanka," he declared.
See box story
on below for edited excerpts from a tape recorded script of Prof.
Peiris' comments at his regular news conference on Thursday. "Spoilers
have begun to work when positive results were manifest in the peace
talks," he said in a veiled reference chiding his one time
Cabinet colleague and now adversary Lakshman Kadirgamar, international
affairs advisor to the President. The former Foreign Minister had
raised issue during a tour of India and later in Sri Lanka during
a briefing to selected publishers and editors earning accusations
from some cabinet ministers. He was accused of criticising the Government
whilst enjoying the benefit of security from Army commandos and
an official bungalow.
The world "spoiler"
is often used liberally by UNF leaders as a tar brush to tarnish
anyone expounding contrary views. Even some references made in these
columns, not sweet music to the ears of UNF leaders, qualified for
those epithets some time ago.
Be that as it may, the People's Alliance also appears to have caused
a colossal blunder. They failed to formally raise issue with the
UNF Government over the Trincomalee controversy, which they quite
rightly regarded, is a matter of serious threat to national security
interests. This is glaring when compared to other issues, some of
them mundane that have been publicly raised. Little wonder they
have to face UNF accusations over the motive behind the campaign.
To say the least, this is unforgivable.
But that is
not to say Prof. Peiris' declarations at the news conference are
synonymous with facts or his own credibility. They have been at
variance at most times. This time, however, the gulf is enormously
wide. So much so, a futile and sloppy attempt has been made to convert
fact into fiction, to ridicule reality and publicly concede a land
mass dominated by the security forces (except Manirasakulam) as
LTTE territory. The fact that it comes from the UNF's chief peace
negotiator, a senior cabinet minister and a learned professor of
law compounds the situation.
The PA raised
issue barely five weeks after exclusive revelations in The Sunday
Times (Situation Report - August 3) about the gradual transformation
of the landscape around Trincomalee with guerrillas opening new
military camps, re-occupying ones abandoned and setting up sattelite
camps around bases that existed. Some UNF media spin doctors who
were unable to grasp the accompanying map in this report claimed
it was based on one formulated by the Navy. For those who saw the
Navy map on this page last week, how futile this misleading propaganda
is abundantly clear. So much for the media spin masters of the UNF.
PA spokesman
Sarath Amunugama, who countered Prof. Peiris' declarations at a
news conference on Friday, said "we are facing a serious situation
today. The Navy spokesman has clearly contradicted the Prime Minister
and the Minister of Defence. They took up the position they were
not aware of recent developments."
Mr. Amunugama
made two important points: (1) Tri service commanders of United
States (PACOM - Pacific Command) had handed over a report to the
Government in October, last year, concerning Trincomalee. (2) The
Army Commander, Lt. Gen. Lionel Balagalle had also submitted a report
on the same subject.
An investigation
by The Sunday Times revealed the facts were mostly different to
what was set out by Dr. Amunugama. However, they clearly disproved
the contentions of Prof. Peiris. Here are the findings:
Just seven
months after the Government-LTTE Ceasefire Agreement was signed,
(in September 2002), United States Defence Attache in Sri Lanka,
Lt. Col. Richard Girven, arranged with the Ministry of Defence in
Colombo for an Assessment Team from the United States Pacific Command
(PACOM), headquartered in Hawaii, to visit Sri Lanka. The team was
to look at the Army, Navy and Air Force from the operational and
tactical levels, determine the capabilities, needs and requirements
of each. Five officers who formed an advisory party of the Commander-in-Chief
of PACOM arrived first followed by 21 officers in late September.
The team was
led by Colonel John A. Kardos from the PACOM and comprised: Lt.
Col. Joel E. Johnson (US Army), Commander Louis M. Meir (US NAVY),
Lt. Col. Martin Mcnamara (US Air Force), Maj. Philip L. Turner (US
Air Force - FAO-XO), Maj. James B. Koerber (Asst. Ground Operations
- US Marines), Lieut. Cmdr. William Jewett (Surface Special Warfare),
Lt. David Silverman (Special Warfare), Maj. Richard N. Shizuru (Aviation
Operations), Maj. Anthony Abati (Counter Terrorist Operations),
Maj. Jeffrey Prough (Counter Insurgency Operations), Signalman Eric
V. Hill (Assistant Counter Insurgency Operations), Lt. Col. Christopher
Keast (Operations Intelligence), CW3 William Ostrowski (Counter
Insurgency - Intelligence), CW4 Robert L. Pierson (Civil Affairs),
Captain Jay Ball (Psychological Operations), Maj. Jeffrey L. Lepak
(Communications), Maj. David A. Ottignon (Engineer), Lt. Col. Michael
K. Baisden (Logistics), CW3 Thomas Pigorsh (Assistant Logistics),
SFC Michael Clark (Communications Specialist), SFC Leonard H. Omelles
(Communications Specialist), SFC William S. Glenn (Medical), Maj.
William B. Downs (Special Operations - Aviation), SFC Jeremy A Burke
(Small Unit Tactics) and Captain Jeremiah Lumbaca (Embassy LNO).
The PACOM team
which was in Sri Lanka from September 30 to October 10, 2002, made
a comprehensive study of the Army, Navy and Air Force. This was
after visiting all their important installations. The Sunday Times
has seen a copy of their weighty report. Commenting on the Navy,
this is what the PACOM report has to say:
"Trincomalee Harbour Defence.
"Discussion:
The most important base for the SLN is without question Trincomalee
Harbour. Currently, the LTTE control the southern portion of the
Harbour. From this area, the LTTE have effectively monitored all
ship movement in and out of the Harbour, launch suicide and artillery
attacks against the Naval Base and could potentially destroy any
vessel coming in and out of the harbour. The SL Army is responsible
for this area but they have been unable to completely secure it.
"Recommendations:
a. The SL Defence force must secure this land area. The vulnerable
position that currently exists could essentially level the majority
of the SLN fleet. The result would be that the only re-supply capability
for the Jaffna Peninsula would have to come from Colombo, more than
four times the distance to Jaffna.
"b. Currently
there are designated areas for the LTTE and areas for the SL Defence
forces. If the southern tip of Trincomalee Harbour has not been
designated for the LTTE, it more than likely isn't, then the SL
government should be massing police and military personnel in this
area in case the hostilities resume.
"c. Without
control of this area the defence of Trincomalee Harbour will always
be a losing battle. Without Trincomalee Harbour the ability to prosecute
the war would be detrimentally affected."
Army Commander
Lt. Gen. Balagalle did not submit a report on the Trincomalee issue
as claimed by Dr. Amunugama. The Sunday Times learnt that a four
page report (together with a map) had in fact been sent to the Ministry
of Defence just two days before Prof. Peiris' press conference.
It had been formulated by the office of Major General Chula Seneviratne,
Director General - General Staff (DGGS) at Army Headquarters. This
was in consultation with Naval intelligence.
Maj. Gen. Seneviratne’s
report, The Sunday Times learnt had made clear that "exploiting
the position of troops not operating in the jungles after the MoU
(Ceasefire Agreement) was signed, LTTE converted their temporary
makeshift bases into permanent camps. In addition, they established
new camps in the Trincomalee area."
He is learnt
to have marked out the details of makeshift camps before the Ceasefire
Agreement and the newly established camps in a map provided to the
Ministry of Defence. That clearly proves Prof. Peiris' assertions
completely wrong and misleading.
If the Navy has contended that there were 13 new camps, the Army
has said there were five makeshift camps and 12 newly established
camps in the Trincomalee area. In addition, it has pointed out,
there were unconfirmed reports of the existence of at least five
camps.
That is not
all. Defence Secretary, Austin Fernando, who conducts regular meetings
with the Head of the SLMM, Gen. Tryggve Tellefsen, has repeatedly
raised the issue of newly opened camps in the Trincomalee sector.
The Sunday Times has seen several copies of minutes of such meetings
where reference is made.
This is what
one such minute says: "S/MOD reminded that action has to be
pursued with the LTTE for them to leave Wan Ela camp. He further
informed HOM/SLMM that there is unconfirmed information that a new
camp is being constructed by the LTTE, south/south east of Wan Ela
Camp, on a 10 acre plot of land belonging to a Muslim person from
Kinniya. He stated that even in the uncleared areas, for the LTTE
to establish new camps is a violation. He promised to give more
details on this camp in due course. HOM/SLMM said that he would
inquire into this case and other instances where such reporting
is made."
More reports
that run counter to the claims of Prof. Peris have come from the
Directorate of Internal Intelligence (DII), the country's premier
national intelligence agency. The Sunday Times has seen several
such reports. Excerpts from one recent report makes the point:
"Information
revealed that, since end-August 2003, coinciding with their military
preparedness, the LTTE is hoarding essentials comprising dry-rations
and fuel in the north and east especially at the newly constructed
warehouses at Sathathiapuram and Vallipuram in Mullaitivu, in the
Wanni, in Upparu and Sampur areas in Trincomalee south ….
"The LTTE
has established a new Base consisting 20 armed cadres under Parimalan
in the un-cleared areas in Uppuweli in Trincomalee south…
The fact that armed cadres of the LTTE are being prepared to back
up their political demands has been made clear by guerrilla leader,
Mr. Prabhakaran long before the signing of the Ceasefire Agreement.
The guerrilla activities clearly indicate hollowness in their pledges
for peace.
Regrettably
the UNF Government remains both supine and blind to threats posed
by the LTTE which have been gradually escalating from seemingly
innocuous demands to grave national security threats. The only concerted
effort that is being made is to keep the truth away from the public.
No new LTTE
camps inTrinco- G.L
The
UNF Government's Chief Peace Negotiator and Spokesman, Prof. G.L.
Peiris claims there are no new LTTE camps in the Trincomalee in
government controlled areas except in Manirasakulam.
Here are edited excerpts
from a tape recorded script of his comments at the regular news
conference on Thursday. When positive results were manifest in the
peace process there are spoilers. They have begun to work.
Reports that 13 new
camps have appeared in the vicinity of the Trincomalee harbour have
been a great deal of security concern by the government, I also
will tell you categorically that this is a spoiler.
Apart from Manirasakulam,
in all the other cases the camps that were referred to were either
in existence before the MoU was signed or it was set up not in areas
dominated by the Government of Sri Lanka. So this falls into one
of these two categories. I also want to tell you that the Minister
of Defence is satisfied with new contingency plans to ensure the
security of the Eastern Province.
The Minister of Defence
is confident and we want to assure the country that the Government
can deal with any situation and that the security of the Eastern
Province and the coast of Trincomalee is not in danger.
The Opposition has made
a visit to the Indian Capital to alarm Indian leaders and that has
not been successful. It is very clear that these are not objectives
to benefit the country, these are coloured by political ambitions
and desires. When that again failed, the Opposition invited selected
media personnel to a private meeting, and then gave material at
the disposal of the persons who have been invited.
We want to ask the question
if the Oppostion believed that is such an important and sensitive
information in their possession, surely the right thing to do, is
to convene a media conference openly, to give access to all media
and tell the media openly and candidly whatever the Opposition wishes
to say. We want to ask why was this done secretively and privately.
what is the reason?
The Government view
is that these are spoiler tactics, these are tactics which are alarming,
destructive and irresponsible. There will be extreme elements. This
is there around the world where there is a peace process, but as
far as the mainstream public opinion is concerned the public is
solidly behind the peace process.
Q: Do you know
how many camps have come up after signing of the MoU?
A: I am not exactly sure. I was told that a categorical
assertion was made there is no camp apart from Manirasakulam, which
was erected after the MoU in an area controlled by the Government.
Q: In terms
of security isn't it significant that the LTTE is establishing large
number of camps in their territory?
A: The Government is also attending to all necessary security
arrangements. The Government has looked into the entire security
situation. We have a contingency plan.
Q: Minister you say that there are contingency plans and
yet say that there is no security threat as the camps are in the
LTTE control areas?
A: What I am saying is that in any event we are prepared.
The problem cannot be serious if the camps are not in the Government
areas. Whatever it is the Government is not unmindful of it. It
is not blind to these problems.
|