Dissent
brews within SLFP over national consensus
By Harinda Vidanage
A crucial SLFP central committee meeting is to be held tomorrow
to finalise the decision on forming an alliance with the JVP. But
sources within the JVP told The Sunday Times that the JVP was concerned
about the talks between the SLFP and the UNF and had decided not
to take part in a national government.
Also JVP MP
Bimal Ratnayake has brought a motion to the party's politburo that
the lower rung of the JVP has been fed up with the delays that have
hampered the SLFP-JVP alliance and has strongly recommended to quit
the process if further delays occur.
The SLFP party
structure has been hit by the dissent that has developed during
the recent weeks as many senior leaders began to question the role
of Mano Tittawella in the party. Also the SLFP stalwarts have pointed
out that the 1994 peace process had been jeopardized when President
Kumaratunga gave the responsibility to her close friends rather
than the experts.
Likewise, the
leaders are asking how a person who has had no interest in the party
can be talking about its future with the UNF government. The Sunday
Times learns that there is a possibility of the party splitting
up as most SLFP MPs are threatening to go to the opposition if a
national government deal is struck.
eanwhile, the
UNF is reportedly trying to instal TNA General Secretary R. Sambanthan
as opposition leader if the national government deal is brokered.
This strategy is to prevent the JVP becoming the main opposition
in the parliament.
Also a committee
of SLFP MPS have decided to request from the President to allow
a conscience vote for the SLFP members to join the national government
and also a campaign has been launched to challenge the functions
of Mr. Tittawella.
The Sunday
Times learns that this campaign has the blessings of many leaders
who are divided on other issues. They include opposition leader
Mahinda Rajapakse, Mangala Samaraweera and even stalwarts like Amarasiri
Dodangoda.
The Tittawella-Samarawickrama committee has agreed in principle
that a government of national consensus must continue for one year,
naming it the "year of development". |