Crumbling under public debt burden
The latest State of the Economy
Report of the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) highlights several
key development issues facing the country. Among them is the need
for political stability and progress in the peace process, the need
for early fiscal consolidation, financial sector weaknesses, public
enterprise reforms and the persistence of poverty.
The report
identifies the burden of public debt as the most fundamental and
serious economic weakness in the economy. The magnitude of the public
debt and its high servicing cost is deemed as the crippling factor,
as it absorbs a disproportionate share of public resources as debt
service payments, thereby rendering fiscal management extremely
difficult.
The report
points out that this has led to a serious misallocation of resources
by appropriating a large chunk of resources being utilised for debt
servicing whereas they should have been expended for investment.
Further, it indicates that even essential current expenditure needed
to sustain basic social services is not available. The sad plight
of the country is that an end to this serious constraint and impasse
in the economy is not in sight.
"Despite
repeated pledges by successive governments of their commitment to
fiscal consolidation, Sri Lanka's total public debt (both internal
and external) reached a level in excess of 100 per cent of the country's
GDP by 2001. In 2002 the public debt had risen to 105 per cent of
GDP. There are little signs that this ratio would be reduced appreciably
in 2003, in spite of higher economic growth," the IPS report
says.
Reducing the
debt is deemed essential to facilitate a progressive easing of interest
payments that have already reached an unsustainable level of nearly
half the total government revenue. A surplus on the primary fiscal
balance should be speedily achieved, if meaningful progress is to
be made in economic management.
The IPS report
is of the view that it is vital to reduce the fiscal deficit to
about 3-4 per cent of GDP from recent levels exceeding 8 per cent.
The report points to the need for fiscal consolidation by both curtailing
expenditure as well as increasing revenue.
However, the IPS is of the view that the scope for trimming expenditure
appears to be limited. The problem is compounded, as the capacity
to increase government revenue also appears to have weakened.
"In recent
years, the country has witnessed a progressive deterioration in
the government's revenue effort," the report says and contends
that it is vital that the fiscal deficit is reduced to a level of
about 3-4 per cent of GDP over the medium term, from recent levels
exceeding 8 per cent.
The tenor of
the report is that the realisation of such a fiscal consolidation
is unlikely owing to the government's inability to rein in expenditure
as well as increase revenue.
The bottom line then is that the most pressing problem in the economy
will remain unresolved. Strong political will and determined action,
the report contends, are essential for better targeting of welfare
expenditure and improving expenditure controls.
While the report
admits that the enactment of the Fiscal Management Responsibility
Act (FMRA) and the Welfare Benefit Law (WBL) to reform the welfare
system with better targeting is an important step in the right direction,
it appears to be sceptical about their implementation.
The improvements
in tax administration and the establishment of a Revenue Authority,
it points out, are still pending. The reduction of the public debt
and its servicing cost being a fundamental prerequisite to economic
progress, it deems bold measures are needed to resolve it.
The report
contends that the scale and magnitude of the problem is such that
it is not possible to reduce the debt burden by economic growth
alone. "The magnitude of the problem and its corrosive impact
on development dictate drastic actions to reduce the public debt.
Only sacrifices in the present for the long-term good of the economy
can effectively reduce the debt burden. Such a call for sacrifice
and burdens are not politically feasible in a context where the
public at large expects benefits rather than burdens," the
report says.
Many of the
other problems in the economy that the IPS report alludes to or
discusses, have at their foundation the poor state of the public
finances. No government could hope to solve the country's economic
and social problems without rectifying this fundamental problem.
Yet there is hardly any progress towards resolving the problem.
By implication the sorry state of the economy will prevail. |