Bunker
war in Colombo port
JKH unit accused of monopolistic
practice
Lanka Marine Services, a subsidiary of John Keells Holdings, has
got embroiled in a court battle with rival bunker supplier, East-West
Bunker Services, owned by Nahil Wijesuriya, and has been accused
of anti-competitive practices and of trying to retain a monopoly
over marine fuel supplies in Colombo port.
The dispute
centres on a clause in the final privatisation agreement LMS signed
with the government which has been interpreted as effectively preventing
other bunker suppliers in Colombo port from using their own infrastructure
to store and supply marine fuels to ships and compels them to use
the common user facilities owned and operated by LMS.
By a strange
coincidence, the two rivals of LMS, East-West Bunker Services and
Lanka Maritime Services, owned by Sri Lanka Shipping, both ran out
of marine fuel stocks the week before last.
This led to
a rebound in Colombo port bunker prices, which had fallen sharply
with the ending of LMS' monopoly and the entry of East-West and
Lanka Maritime Services following the liberalisation of the bunker
business. LMS had an effective monopoly for about one year before
other players came in to the market.
Wijesuriya's
company has protested to the government against what it says is
the alteration of the original draft agreement when bids were called
to privatise LMS and the insertion of a clause into the final agreement,
after JKH bought LMS for Rs 1.2 billion, that it says prevents other
players from supplying bunkers on their own.
Clause 8.1
of the agreement says that the government, Sri Lanka Ports Authority
and Ceylon Petroleum Corporation "shall ensure that all bunkers/
marine fuels handled and transported within the port of Colombo
would be handled and transported using the common user facilities."
The common user facilities refer to the Dolphin berth in the port,
the South Jetty and inter-connecting pipelines, all of which are
owned by LMS.
This clause
was not in the draft agreement given to bidders when the Public
Enterprises Reform Commission issued the request for proposals.
PERC director general Manjula de Silva declined comment on the dispute
describing it as a "post-privatisation issue" that was
being looked into with various views being expressed by different
parties.
Sanjeeva Fernando,
director and general manager of LMS, contacted by The Sunday Times
FT on Friday declined immediate comment and asked the newspaper
to contact him later in the day. However, the newspaper was unable
to get through to Fernando subsequently despite repeated telephone
calls and messages.
East-West Bunker
Services, which has chartered a 37,000 DWT tanker for use as a floating
storage vessel has got an interim injunction in the Colombo District
Court preventing LMS from interfering in its bunker business. LMS
has filed objections denying the charges made by East-West. Lanka
Maritime Services director M. Reza said the bunker business had
started picking up after liberalization and the introduction of
competitive pricing and that any return to a monopoly situation
would kill the market.
"In October-November
the number of ships calling for bunkers increased," he said.
"The business grew from 12-15,000 tonnes a month to 18-20,000
tonnes. We'll be back with marine gas oil (soon) and I can assure
you the price will drop again."
ast-West has
accused LMS of anti-competitive behaviour and of wanting to dominate
and monopolise the bunker business and to drive competitors out
of business. It said it got a bunkering license from the Ministry
of Power and Energy in 2002 allowing it to supply marine fuel oils
either by bunker barges or tankers or through a land-based terminal
and was not obliged to use a land-based facility. The use of floating
storage is cheaper and easier. East-West entered the bunkering business
in September 2003 and has been supplying marine oil to ships in
and outside Colombo port using bunker barges.
LMS wrote to
the SLPA in September complaining that the SLPA was allowing others
to handle bunkers in Colombo port without using the common user
facilities which it said violated its agreement with the government.
It said the SLPA was obliged to ensure that all bunker supplies
would be via the common user facilities.
East-West maintains that there was no such provision in the draft
agreement which it says is "materially different" from
final agreement signed between LMS and government authorities.
It has written
to the Treasury Secretary saying the insertion of "an extraneous
clause" into the final agreement was done without the knowledge
of other bidders and should be removed. |