Kandy
fruit seller’s 2nd FR against police
By Laila Nasry
A rights application filed by a fruit stall owner alleging he was
tortured by the police for having previously filed an FR application
against them on the grounds of illegal arrest and torture was given
the go ahead by the Supreme Court.
The Bench comprising
Justices Ameer Ismail, C.V. Wigneswaran and J.A.N. de Silva granted
leave to proceed for the alleged infringement of fundamental rights
guaranteed by Articles 11 and 13(1) of the Constitution, which provides
for freedom from torture, cruel inhuman and degrading treatment
and freedom from arbitrary arrest. Court also directed the Registrar
to call for the medical reports pertaining to the petitioner.
The petitioner
M.P.S. Thaminda of Kandy citing Sub Inspector Bandula of the Kandy
Police, Inspector Dharmaratne, a constable, HQI Edmund Mahendra,
among others as respondents, declares that SI Bandula had threatened
him on several occasions stating that unless he withdraws the previous
case for which leave to proceed had been granted, the police will
frame him on drug or bomb charges and make him suffer.
In the wake
of such threats, Thaminda states he complained to the regional Human
Rights Commission, consequent to which SI Bandula had abused him
in indecent language, threatened to kill him and dealt several blows
to his face, stomach and back. He also alleges he was illegally
arrested and taken to the Crimes Branch where he was beaten again.
He states he
was further assaulted for having informed the JMO before whom he
was produced that he had been assaulted. In addition his fingerprints
had also been forcibly obtained on a bottle in which a bomb had
been placed.
As a result
of the torture on November 13 he was admitted to the Kandy hospital
subsequent to his vomiting blood and passing urine with blood. He
prays court for a declaration that his fundamental rights have been
violated and for compensation amounting to Rs. 500,000. The case
was fixed for hearing on May 10, 2004. |