Why we are on the fast road to nowhere
A
flyway over Dematagoda and a new dual carriageway between Borella
and High Level Road via Narahenpita has given the Colombo driver
a faint inkling of what it means to drive properly.
But
that's more or less the be all and end all of "highway development''
in Sri Lanka. Other key highways including the main artery roads
remain urban wastelands of traffic and chaos.
New
Delhi recently built a subway. The entire system was conceptualised
by an Indian engineer. Now, Shanghai is purchasing the world's fastest
passenger train system.
The
stock answer given to any query about how Sri Lanka's transport
and highway systems cannot keep pace with this kind of development
in the rest of Asia is that there is no comparison.
The
passenger transport system in the Western province particularly,
is almost close to being dysfunctional. Meanwhile, there are no
significant new mass transit systems being conceptualised in the
country - and neither are there any highways.
Recently,
a sustainable development expert who lives abroad, plopped an interesting
theory in front of me. He says that countries like Sri Lanka should
not take offers from aid giving nations -- specially the Japanese
-- because these countries want to hand over aid to develop our
highway systems just so that there will be enough smooth roads per
square mile for them to keep their re-conditioned vehicles in the
Sri Lankan market!
He
says the only way Sri Lanka could mend the transport problem is
by improving the mass transit systems such as the railways. Interesting
argument, except that he hadn't considered that buses for instance,
which definitely fall under the category of mass transit in my book,
also traverse the highways. How transportation of people in buses
can improve without a better highway network is something that beats
me.
Moreover,
if the Japanese have been trying to push their re-conditioned vehicle
sales by giving us money to build highways, I figure that they would
have been doing this for a long time now. But, there is no improvement
in our highway system at all in the last few decades. The Colombo
Kandy Road remains little more than winding ramp, and the Colombo
Galle highway is so narrow at points that this artery definitely
seems to suffer from a dangerous form of clotting.
If
the Japanese have been giving us money to construct highways, either
this money went unused because our politicians saw through the Japanese
stratagem (!) or went unused because we as a race are determined
to frustrate the Japanese (!) Either way, there are no highways
that are testimony to the Japanese ambition to sell re-conditioned
vehicles in Sri Lanka.
If
the Japanese are offering us money to build highways, the answer
should be to take it. Build them, and put more buses on these highways
--- if we are not getting money from anywhere to have fast trains
or tramways.
My
sustainable development friend is worried that there will be a glut
of Japanese cars in the country with more Japanese funded highways,
which will lead to highly unsustainable development with carbon
dioxide emissions and a gluttonous appetite for fossil fuels being
the upshot.
But,
we have to improve our ramshackle highway system (if I t can be
called that) before we put any more mass transit on it. When we
do, we can put more buses on these roads. My friend says the reason
there is no public transport in the US, is that the motorcar lobby
there keeps mass transit systems from being built in most cities.
There
may be a grain of truth in that -- but Greyhound buses do operate
on interstate highways. These interstate highways were built (not
with Japanese aid one might add…) and they did not materialise
at the touch of a magic wand.
A
one car per family is derided by my ''sustainable development''
friend. I keep telling him, not to worry, that won't happen, not
in Sri Lanka, not on your life.
But
he insists that the Japanese are giving us money to build our highways
so that there will be a one family one car policy or preferably
one family one or more cars policy.
Though
the thought of ugly gas guzzlers bumper to bumper is not pleasant
to anybody, and though its correct that the appetite for fossil
fuels keeps countries such as those in the Middle East entrapped
in all kinds of exploitative power arrangements with the super power,
there is also no going behind the fact that the Malaysian success
story is enviable.
Mahathir
Mohammed has asked his successor to pursue a one family one-car
policy, and already, there is more than 60 per cent car ownership
in Malaysia.
This
means that Malaysia's highways have improved, and with the improvement
in transportation the quality of life has improved. It does not
mean that every Malaysian is on the streets with his or her car
every day. But there is something egalitarian about the thought
of having one family own one car -- because this is as opposed to
some families owning all the cars.
Besides,
"development'' is double edged, it has always been, and man
is a consuming animal. What the "sustainable development''
experts need NOT do is to keep our country from moving forward,
from having more highways. If we don't have highways, it translates
also as lack of infrastructure, and if there is no infrastructure
a country will not progress. The 'word' progress here used in most
senses of the word except that one pejorative sense.
But,
a system of developing highways should go in lockstep with the development
of an efficient public transportation system -- fast trains, subways
what have you. The problem in our country is that neither of these
is happening.
Instead,
we have gridlock in government, and economic stagnation with all
the sustainable development experts preaching to us how we should
develop ourselves. Perhaps a country not only needs an efficient
highway and transportation system but also should possess one as
a matter of pride. Its now history that J. R. Jayewardene wanted
to establish a national airline because it was a prestigious project.
Lee Kwan Yew the Singaporean PM was approached by Jayewardene for
help on this matter, and Lee told him that an airline project was
not Sri Lanka's priority as there were other needed projects that
should precede it.
But,
Jayewardene proceeded. There is no point talking of the merits or
demerits of that. But a highway project and an efficient transportation
network includes all elements. It meets an aching need for efficient
infrastructure and a system of streamlined public transportation.
But it also is a badge of pride for a country. Anybody will want
to come to a country or invest in it - if there is a good system
of roads coupled with efficient public conveyance that the country
can boast of.
|