Crash-landing
and the cracks
By Nalaka Nonis
The reputation of Sri Lanka's Aviation industry took
a nose-dive following the belly-landing of Russian-built IL-18 aircraft
charted by a Sharjah based company, at the BIA on Wednesday, mainly
because of the authorities mishandling of the incident and the non
availability of an alternative runway in a crisis situation.
After
the crash-landing, officials debarred journalists from entering
the airport and this in turn had fuelled panic and doubt about the
nature of the accident and even brought into question the efficiency
of Sri Lanka's international airport especially in the foreign scene.
Journalists
who had rushed to the scene were reportedly greeted by high-handed
officials who had not allowed them to take pictures of the cargo
plane.
"Authorities
in the airport behaved as if it was their private property. We wanted
to photograph the ill-fated aircraft to give the people a true picture.
But we were not allowed to do so," one reporter complained.
One
website had even gone to the extent of carrying the story about
the crash-landing, supporting it with the picture of a Sri Lankan
airline aircraft damaged during the infamous LTTE attack on the
BIA in July 2001. The picture was carried in the absence of being
able to take the real pictures. SriLankan Airlines' promptly issued
a statement clarifying the situation. The statement said that it
was a privately-owned Illushin IL-18 cargo aircraft that was involved
in the mishap.
On
the other hand the lack of an alternative runway came to the forefront
as many passengers were left stranded and flights coming into BIA
had to be diverted to other destinations. The airport was shut down
for about 10 hours. Flights coming from Frankfurt, Dubai, Karachi,
Kuwait, Trichy, Riyadh were diverted while flights from BIA to London,
Bombay, Madras, Trichy, Cochin, Male, Dubai, and Kuwait were delayed
by several hours.
Observers
say the government would not have had to incur such a big financial
loss in the face of the crisis, if there had been a second runway
which is yet to take off the ground. Aviation Ministry secretary
Cecil Amarasinghe told The Sunday Times that the construction of
a second runway at the Katunayake airport had run into problems
mainly due to protests over land acquisition. He said there are
alternative proposals to build another airport in Kudaoya, Wellawaya.
H.M.C.
Nimalsiri, the Director General of Civil Aviation told The Sunday
Times that the financial damage caused by the aircraft accident
would run into millions of rupees. The financial losses not only
include 15 runway lights and taxiway lights that were damaged when
the cargo plane crash-landed but also hotel accommodation for passengers
whose flights were diverted.
Meanwhile,
the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has appointed a 11-member
team comprising officials specialised in airworthiness operations
and air traffic services to investigate the belly-landing. A statement
from the Civil Aviation Authority of Sri Lanka said the DGCA had
notified officials of the Russian Federation the Republic of Kyrgyz,
the Emirates and the International Civil Aviation Organisation regarding
the accident and investigations. They have also been asked to send
representatives for the investigations if they wish to.
The
Civil Aviation Authority said that the Investigation team has already
started preliminary work relating to the accident and accordingly
the Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR) of the aircraft and the
Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) have been removed from the aircraft
. The Aviation Authority said the flight crew and air traffic controllers
who were on duty at the time of the crash-landing have also been
interviewed. |