Zimbabwe
are hopeless
Should the Zimbabwe cricket authorities and the fifteen players
who have defected from playing fail to compromise in the near future,
their cricket is in danger of even dying a natural death. There
was song and dance in some quarters after the performance in the
first one dayer against Sri Lanka. Analyze the performance: it was
one man's efforts and the Sri Lankans not being in top gear that
helped that performance.
Tatenda
Taibo is a talented, brave young player. He stands out amongst his
mob. There is no doubt that given time he will develop into being
a very successful player. He certainly has the potential, the correct
mental approach and temperament to succeed in the game.
The
average age of the current lot in action is twenty-and-a-half. That
indicates it is a team totally unsuitable for international cricket.
No nation can survive with such a young outfit. Experience of some
sort is a must.
In
the opening one dayer the Zimbabweans got away with beginners luck
and youthful exuberance. That will wear away when the honeymoon
is over and the hard grind begins. As it was, the second game proved
just that. In his desperation to keep the scoreboard ticking Taibu
dashed for a second run on Mahela Jayawardane misfield. It turned
out to be a calculated misfield as the return defeated the young
diminutive captain. Although there was some resistance and a few
lusty blows executed Zimbabwe could only manage 136 runs and fell
well short of batting through the allotted fifty overs too.
Sri
Lanka missed the services of a third seamer. In the opening game
Nuwan Kulasekera went for 20 runs in the first spell of two overs.
He was given just one more by the captain where he conceded six
runs. Then he was disposed of for the next game.
Zimbabwe
were 79 for 4 wickets in the opening game. Clearly Sri Lanka felt
the pinch without an effective third seamer. Even this Zimbabwe
outfit can hang around and get a few runs against Upul Chandana
and Sanath Jayasuriya. There is some assistance for the quicker
bowlers on these pitches, so a third seamer is a must.
Again,
in the second game, Chaminda Vaas had the opposition tottering at
27 for 4 wickets. Then a partnership of forty-nine runs followed.
A good spell of half-a-dozen overs from a third seamer could well
have averted that. In fact, Upul Chandana who came on to bowl first
change, gave away nineteen runs in four overs in his first spell.
Should
Dilhara Fernando not be fully fit and the four selectors not have
faith in Nuwan Kulasekera, then youngster Mahroof must get the nod
to play. He bowled very well in the under 19 World Cup and is a
capable all rounder. Against this opposition, on the given conditions,
why play seven frontline batsmen? It does not make sense.
Cricket
requires the contribution of generations for a nation to step out
and succeed at international level. It is the main reason for Bangladesh
falling flat on their faces, even when there is some sign of progress.
Whatever they do, they will continue to struggle for another couple
of decades.
Zimbabwe,
formerly Rhodesia, played much cricket within South Africa until
gaining independence in the nineteen-sixties. They have inherited
a rich heritage in the game. That cannot be destroyed.
The
blacks and the whites, whatever the political differences have to
keep their hands locked in cricket, for the survival and progress
of the game. They definitely need each other. The day may come when
the team could be majority or even all black players. But not yet.
It was not until the nineteen seventies that West Indians became
an all-black team, after having become a test playing nation in
the late nineteen twenties.
Zimbabwe
have to sort out their crisis. At present their team of cricketers
are hopeless to be playing at the highest level. |