Economy
facing turbulent political times and oil price hike
Can
the Sri Lankan economy be resilient in a turbulent political environment?
The events since the elections of April 2 make this the uppermost
question in people's mind. Regrettably the unfolding events make
people more and more sceptical of political events becoming any
saner.
The
President's statement on the eve of her departure abroad hardly
did anything to bolster economic confidence. Her departure appeared
a running away from the political crises at home. The future of
the economy must rest on the shoulders of producers of goods and
services, big and small, whose expectations of government pursuing
proactive policies conducive to their activities, must be kept in
cold storage.
One
leading businessman was quoted in the Financial Times of June 10
as saying that between January and April we did not have a government
owing to the impending elections and that the parliamentary fracas
had demonstrated that we did not need one. However facetious this
comment may have been, it has a kernel of truth.
There
can be little expectation that the political problems of a minority
government would be solved. While it finds its ways of limping and
limping from one crisis to another, the people of the country must
find their means of livelihood. And that is becoming more and more
difficult owing to the escalating prices. It is no secret that vegetable
prices have been skyrocketing from April onwards.
The
rise in oil prices is still to have its impact owing to the government's
pricing policies. The previous government adopted a policy of passing
on higher import costs of petroleum products gradually by a price
formula related to import prices, and some cross subsidisation.
The present practice of retaining consumer prices of petroleum products
at old prices will mean that sooner rather than later, prices will
hit the consumer in shock waves.
This
pricing policy has many disadvantages. Consumers would not be adjusting
their demand to the changes in international prices. Their demand
would be based on an unsustainable price level. This has implications
for both government finances and the trade balance. Consumers not
curtailing demand for petroleum products in response to higher prices
would result in the continuation of high expenditure on imports.
Already the trade deficit is threatening. Chances are that the trade
deficit will zoom to an unprecedented amount by the end of the year.
The
suppression of consumer prices would result in a subsidisation of
prices that would be a cost to the government. This means that public
expenditure would increase resulting in a higher budget deficit
than predicted. The costs of the higher prices would have a very
significant impact on electricity cost generation and this would
mean higher government expenditure to subsidise electricity as well.
The
political uncertainties, irresponsible political behaviour, inaction
in economic policies, disputes in the administration and focus on
petty issues like the purchase of land by foreigners, are all leading
to an erosion of confidence in the government's economic policies.
These together with the adverse trade balance and the unfavourable
international price movements have placed a strain on foreign exchange.
The depreciation of the rupee has been the consequence. For the
first time the US Dollar is worth more than one hundred rupees.
This depreciation of the rupee would in turn result in higher import
prices and fuel a spiralling of prices. Higher inflation is on the
cards with its debilitating impact on economic growth and the livelihoods
of the poor.
The
biggest danger at the moment is that a government faced with these
difficulties, and having no majority in parliament, would pursue
policies that are populist and dangerous to the economy in the long
run. The "cure" may be worse than the problem. The pursuance
of inward looking economic policies, government control of economic
activities, restrictions on exchange transactions, limitations on
foreign investment and a return to state controlled policies may
result in a reversal of economic trends from which it may be difficult
to recover. |