Economic
indicators threatening though good in parts
The economic statistics of the first four months, like the proverbial
Curate's Egg is good in parts. Official economists would describe
them as a "mixed performance", often a phrase used to
describe not too good a performance. On the surface they are not
bad either. Let's taste the better parts first.
Exports
grew by 15.7 per cent. Especially noteworthy was the fact that industrial
exports continued to increase by 16.3 per cent and agricultural
exports by 22.2 per cent. However the country's leading export,
garments grew by less than 10 per cent. Private industrial production
grew by 3.9 per cent, continuing its up-trend.
Tea
production increased and so did rubber that was at last showing
a revival. Coconut production too increased. Paddy production however
declined from that of the Maha 2003 harvest that was a record. Tourist
arrivals as well as tourist earnings continued to grow by 5.4 per
cent. Considering the fact that these months encompassed a period
of political instability and elections, there is reason to be happy
about this performance.
Nevertheless
the direction of other indicators are significant. The trade balance
showed a large deficit owing to an increase in import expenditures
by 19 per cent. Intermediate imports increased by a significant
15 per cent mainly owing to higher prices of imports, especially
oil. Capital goods imports increased by 50 per cent, though this
is an unfavourable development for the trade balance, it is a good
indicator of investment.
The
magnitude of the deficit is indeed a cause for anxiety. The trade
deficit had risen to US $ 723 million at the end of the fourth month,
a 28 per cent increase in comparison with the same period last year.
As the causes for the large deficit has shown no signs of abatement,
this means that the country is likely to face an unprecedented high
trade deficit of perhaps around US$ 2000 million at the end of the
year. Since capital inflows are not likely to offset this large
deficit, the Balance of Payments is likely to be in deficit too.
External
assets have begun a slide. At the end of May the total external
reserves of the country was 2.5 per cent less than at the end of
2003. Government revenues have declined even in comparison with
last year's inadequate collection. In the first four months revenue
collections were 2.6 per cent less than in the corresponding period
of last year. On the other hand, public expenditures have increased
in the first four months by 6.2 per cent and are likely to increase
further owing to the enforced subsidies.
The
public debt that was brought into focus by the previous government
has grown rather than diminished during its two-year regime. At
the end of April it had risen to Rs 1071 billion higher than the
2003 end year position More disconcerting is the fact that it is
likely to grow further owing to the increased social expenditures,
subsidies and low tax collections.
The
implications of these developments are that both our government
finances and our external account are likely to be unfavourable
this year. This will in turn exert pressures on the domestic interest
rates and the external value of the Rupee. Both are being experienced
already. The question uppermost in the minds of people is whether
the government would explain the problems it is facing, especially
with respect to the effects of the oil price increase and the stringent
fiscal situation, and change its policies.
A
petrol price increase would raise the cost of living even more and
create a wave of unpopularity for a government that promised stable,
albeit a reduction of prices. Now that the provincial council elections
have been won, will the government have the courage to suspend increases
in government expenditure such as on its graduate unemployment scheme
and increased salaries for public servants and target the Samurdhi
programme to the needy?
These
would indeed be bold steps that are unlikely in the context of its
doubtful majority in parliament. What we can realistically expect
is a continuation of politically motivated economic policies and
the postponement of the day of reckoning. In brief economic stability
and long term growth are a distant dream. |