Clash
brews over two 'urgent' bills in parliament
Govt. and opposition set for stormy
debate
By Chandani Kirinde
Stage is being set for another stormy session in parliament this
week with the opposition expressing disapproval over government
moves to pass two urgent bills without all-party consensus.
Much
of the rumpus has been about the bill that seeks to make National
Identity Cards mandatory for voters in elections. Opposition parties
are questioning the urgency to push through the bill when the next
election - the presidential poll - is one year and four months away.
The
proposed legislation titled Elections (Special Provisions) Bill
will make identification an essential criterion for voters at all
local and national elections as well as referenda.
The
other bill which is the bone of contention between the government
and the opposition, seeks to impose a 100 per cent tax on foreigners
buying land in Sri Lanka. The days for debate of the bills have
been set for 18, 19 and 20 of this month.
The
two bills have been referred to the Supreme Court by the President
for determination on their constitutionality. The Supreme Court's
ruling on these two bills have been handed over to Speaker W. J.
M. Lokubandara who is expected to announce them when sittings resume
on Tuesday, The Sunday Times learns.
Opposition
parties are discussing what course of action to take if the bills
are taken up for debate without giving them enough time to study
them. The UNP and the JHU have both expressed concern over the manner
in which the bills are being brought to Parliament.
Matters
came to a head at last week's party leaders meeting with the two
UNP representatives, Karu Jayasuriya and Joseph Michael Perera,
walking out after government leaders insisted that the two bills
should be passed this week.
The
government leaders are reported to have insisted that when the Cabinet
determined a bill was urgent in the national interest, it could
bypass the normal passage of being gazetted and placed on the order
paper of Parliament.
However,
opposition parties point out that if a bill is labelled as urgent
and referred to the Supreme Court by the President without its contents
not being made public, it eliminates the right of any citizen to
petition the Supreme Court challenging a bill within one week of
the first reading of a bill.
The
Supreme Court is required to send its determination within three
days and once the Speaker announces it in Parliament, the bills
can be debated and passed on the same day if the minister in charge
of the subject so wishes. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court's determination
on the bill to stop unethical conversions is also likely to be announced
on Tuesday by the Speaker. |