Corporate
brief
Is ESC the right solution?
Innovative revisions have been the feature of the recent
tax legislation. These were also the first laws of the present government
elected to power in April with high public expectations.
Taxation
plays an influential role in investment, employment and the general
well being of the people. The Economic Service Charge (ESC), a proposal
of the Budget 2004, was among the many tax laws passed in parliament
in September. Based on the minimum tax concept, ESC is a tax (ranging
from 0.25 to 1%) on turnover on all businesses exceeding a turnover
of Rs 50 million. ESC paid is recoverable against income tax payable
within a period of two years with no provision for refunds thereafter.
As
pointed out by the revenue authorities no business can continue
to be operated at a loss, but for many who are incurring genuine
losses ESC would be an additional burden that may drive them to
further despair. This is not what we want during an economic downturn.
As
the Commissioner of Inland Revenue (large tax payer unit) described
it, government hospitals and schools among other various infrastructure
facilities are used by all businesses directly or indirectly and
hence a minimum tax is payable to the society in return.
The
concept of minimum tax is not entirely uncommon but one based on
turnover is rare. Past practices in the developed world do not provide
encouraging evidence that taxes of this nature have achieved the
original goal. Instead they have added substantial complexity to
an already overburdened tax structure. Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT),
an unusual levy, was first introduced in USA in 1975 following concerns
that a large number of high income tax payers were not paying income
taxes. The 1986 tax reform act provided a better mechanism to counter
artificial tax shelters leading to tax losses which led to loss
of state revenue.
AMT
however is not a tax based on turnover but on income worked out
on a different basis with actual liability being the greater of
the two under the two systems.
Minimum
Alternative Tax (MAT) was introduced in India in 1996, but this
too is not turnover based. Additionally, MAT is applicable only
to profit making companies. Indians have been wise to exempt certain
infrastructure projects and exports from MAT due to their national
economic importance.
We
often hear the tax authorities going public on the deficiencies
of the system and large scale evasion. Sadly these defects have
not been rectified and it is the compliant who are mostly taxed.
Given the global trends of a wider role for the private sector and
the pruning down of state sector employment, governments must provide
the right business environment to generate profits and create employment.
ESC
legislation presumes that all businesses and sectors are equal in
capacity in earning profits and hence the levy is no major issue.
BOI companies who of course enjoy many concessions have been given
preferential treatment.
One
example of a crucial sector is the plantations - a low margin, high
turnover business operating amidst threats of periodic wage demands.
Owing to continuing high capital investments and brought forward
tax losses (tea/rubber as raw material commodities are subject to
global conditions and may not yield profits evenly) most of the
plantation companies will not be liable to Income Tax and will not
have the liberty to set off the ESC liability against tax payable.
While this situation justifies the minimum tax concept it may have
a negative impact on the economy on the longer term.
Sri
Lanka is a highly import dependent economy relying heavily on exports,
foreign investments and other foreign exchange earnings such as
tourism and worker remittances to pay for imports. This situation
demands a cautionary approach by policy makers on taxing the export
businesses competing in the global market.
Today
Colombo tea auction prices are booming and providing comfort to
the depleting foreign reserves. Oil rich Middle Eastern countries,
major consumers of our tea, may spur further demand. Iran has just
privatized the tea imports. These opportunities should not be missed
by weakening the important plantation sector which has now graduated
to a quality conscious food product supplier. |