Critical period in 2006
JAAF suggests developing rural
areas, more infrastructure
By Iromi Perera
The end to textile quotas and the phasing out of
the Multi Fibre Agreement next year is a serious issue affecting
Sri Lanka's garment industry but the real problems will actually
come in mid-2005 and early 2006.
According
to Tuly Cooray, Secretary General of the Joint Apparel Association
Forum (JAAF), 2005 will not be the critical period as all companies
have orders till the May-June period of 2005.
"At
the moment, no companies are closed. All are busy," says Cooray.
The companies have already placed orders by the buyers up to June
next year and it is then, when the orders for 2006 are placed, that
the impact of the loss of quotas will be realized.
The
industry is currently not in a position to predict the impact. "The
signals we're getting are mixed. Not all that bad, not too good.
If you take some of the categories that were liberated from quota
before 2005, in some we have totally lost the market and some we
have gained despite competition from China and India," notes
Cooray. The Sri Lankan government has also been extremely supportive
to the industry and has come up with important assistance by way
of policy framework, financial assistance and creating an environment
that conducive.
With
benefits from the European Union such as GSP Plus and the precautionary
measures taken by countries such as the US, who are trying to safeguard
their markets from surges from India and China, the markets will
be open to Sri Lanka and the shocks that are being expected won't
be too large, the JAAF CEO said. That way, job losses can be managed
with the given framework. But if the expectations are wrong, people
losing their jobs will be a major issue, along with the loss of
the export market.
At
the moment there are no standard ways of termination or paying compensation
to workers and this is a matter subject to a lot of discussions.
Currently, the JAAF is working on two specific plans along with
trade unions, NGO's, the buyers' community, the industry, the government
and other relevant institutions such as the International Labour
Organization (ILO), in order to prepare for the MFA phase out. These
two plans are compliance requirements and the prevention of job
losses.
Sri
Lanka is recognized by the EU as one country that meets the compliance
requirements. JAAF believes that this recognition is the way forward
to promoting the industry as a socially responsible apparel manufacturer
and are currently working on some issues relating to this.
One
issue is to ensure that social compliance audits are being done
in a proper manner. "The concern the industry has on that count
is that we believe, despite our record, that increasingly we are
being asked to raise our standards. Countries in the region are
penetrating into the market without the required level of compliance.
We
know that some countries have child labour and prison labour and
they do not have the freedom of association. But increasingly the
market is being grabbed by them due to one simple reason - price.
There are also other unfair practices implemented by these countries
but buyers are shifting to that. On one hand we believe compliance
is one area we can market ourselves and explore possibilities to
increase market access. But with the buyers shifting to those who
do not comply, we don't know where we stand," said Cooray.
The industry has requested the World Trade Organization to ensure
that fair trade prevails after 2005 and it has also taken up a petition
for a global alliance for fair trade in textile and clothing trading,
initiated by the Turks and Americans.
The
other issue regarding compliance is the frequency of audits that
are being undertaken by the companies. JAAF is exploring the possibilities
of buyers coming to an agreement on the minimum standards required
by each and everyone.
Anything
beyond this can be audited by the buyers themselves. This raises
two more issues on as to how it can be standardized and who would
standardize. "The question of how it can be standardized is
the easy task," believes Cooray. "If we can come up with
a consensus of basic standards in relation to toilets, space, etc;
- standard guidelines accepted by everybody. Everybody will be audited
only beyond that expectation by the buyers." The question of
who will standardize brings about questions of credibility, independence
and acceptability. A professionally unbiased neutral organization
that is accepted by everyone is the only possibility but the creation
of this organization has not been so easy. "We had a number
of meetings with direction from the ILO but we find it impossible
to come up with a consensus because all parties are trying to pursue
their own agenda and not the industry's or country's agenda.
That's
a problem we're facing. A task force has been set up and we're trying
to see the possibility of setting up a standards institute of Sri
Lanka to be the credible institution in the eyes of all parties,"
explained Cooray. |