Bolivian
experience of split screen
The experimental Bolivian movie ‘Sexual Dependency’
which won rave reviews at a number of international Film Festivals
now being screened at Rio cinema Colombo.
The
film which won the International Critics Prize at Locarno film festival,
Italy-2003 and screened at Telluride Film Festival, North America
among a number of other festivals is from Bolivia, a country that
had produced few films in its history.
It
portrays the lives of five young people from different cultural
and socio- economic backgrounds: a girl from a working class family,
whose father dominates the family; a 15-year-old Columbian boy forced
by his friends to go to a hooker; an upper- class young man goes
to study at a US university and finds prejudice; a young black woman
student who is gang raped by jocks while walking home alone at night
on the campus, and a male model and football star, who is a repressed
homosexual.
The
debut film of 25-year-old director, Rodrigo Bellott has hired split
screen effect throughout the film. This is the first thing that
strikes one about Sexual Dependency that, except for one sequence,
the entire film is shown using a split-screen technique. In a way
this aesthetic choice has dominated all discussion of the film,
detracting from many of its other qualities, both in style and content.
In
the history of film making there have been previous attempts at
splitting the screen from as way back as D. W Griffith’s epics
and Abel Gance’s Napoleon, which often resorts to multiple
images, through to its sporadic use in mainstream Hollywood films
such as It’s Always Fair Weather and Pillow Talk, to the more
recent Time Code.
But,
the young Bolivian director Rodrigo Bellott has taken the courageous
step of choosing to use the split screen throughout in a consistently
inventive way. The split screen only enriches the portrayal of the
marginalised characters. For example, the black girl has a monologue,
or rather, dialogue with herself after the rape.
Each
scene is shot with two cameras so that a constant split screen narrative
shows different angles of the same event as well as parallel and
concurrent footage. But for some this bold experimental could also
fail to hang together as a watchable film, straining audience sympathies
in too many directions before finally collapsing under its own strident
weight. |