Should
we be content and complacent?
The
modest growth achieved last year has once again induced a tone of
complacency and satisfaction in the Central Bank Annual Report for
2004 that was released last week. Complacency and contentment with
our achievements have been one of the underlying reasons for the
continued low incomes, poverty and unemployment in the country.
This attitude, lacking a perspective of what's happening in the
rest of the world, has tended to keep us relatively underdeveloped.
Yet,
in presenting the Annual Report the Governor mentioned that a 6
to 8 per cent annual growth was needed. In fact an 8 to 10 percent
growth sustained over a decade or so is necessary to make any significant
headway. This, as the Annual Report points out, is not likely to
be achieved this year for several reasons. So we must look to 2006
to achieve even a 6 per cent growth. Whether we could achieve even
a 6 per cent growth next year is conjectural, as we know neither
the international economic outlook nor the developments in the country
in 2006. What we have to digest are the more realistic facts before
us that the economy grew at 5.4 per cent last year and that it is
very likely that growth would dip below 5 per cent this year.
The
Central Bank has pointed out the extenuating circumstances affecting
the economy and argued that in such a context the 5.4 growth was
quite acceptable. The most significant conditions vindicating the
growth rate were the political uncertainty in the first part of
the year, the elections and change of government. A motley combination
of parties forming a government initially with a slender majority
added to the uncertain political climate in which the economy had
to perform. Surprisingly these uncertainties do not appear to have
had an effect in many areas of economic activity.
In
fact Colombo's Stock market performed well and the rate of investment
in the economy rose to 25 per cent of GDP. Exports grew by 20 per
cent and investment goods imports grew faster than consumption imports.
The serious dent was in the balance of payments, where the sharp
increase in oil prices resulted in an unprecedented trade deficit
of US$ 2000 million. The impact of the oil price increase that continues
and the balance of payments difficulties are still to show their
impact on the economy. The adverse impacts through a rise in domestic
prices, a higher budget deficit and slowing down of international
economy will be felt only this year.
The
Central Bank was quite jubilant that the Country's per capita income
had risen above the US$ 1000 mark. Regrettably, such a surpassing
is not akin to a cricketer scoring a century or passing say 5000
runs in test cricket. The plain truth is that we are still one of
the poorest countries in the world. Our per capita income of a thousand
US Dollars compares very unfavourably with the per capita incomes
of East and South East Asian countries. Malaysia, Indonesia, and
Thailand have respectively per capita incomes that are four times,
thrice and twice ours. There is no need to compare Sri Lanka to
Singapore, Japan or Korea to make the point. Even China that for
long was considered a poor country has surpassed our per capita
income with its current high growth of nearly ten per cent and low
population growth. It would take only seven years for China to double
her GDP and about 9 years to double her per capita income.
Even
in comparison with the poorer countries in the South Asian region,
our income has grown less rapidly than those of India for instance.
Though India's per capita income is about one half of ours, it's
growing very rapidly and likely to double in about ten years. The
Maldives has a per capita income that is twice ours. Moreover, in
spite of a low population growth in the country, our per capita
income has increased only 101 US$ since 1999, when it was 899 US
Dollars. At the rate of economic growth of about 5 per cent, it
would take 14 years for Sri Lanka's GDP to double and about 17 years
to double our per capita incomes. This leaves us still so much below
the levels of most Asian countries.
The
plain truth is that the economy has a lot of catching up to do,
but the political preoccupations, internal squabbling, a dysfunctional
institutional set up and our social values are inimical to our development.
A country that is fast becoming ungovernable, where law and order
is deteriorating fast and reforms are impossible to implement, hardly
provides the environment for higher growth. |