Closer
to JM, further from JVP
By Our Political Editor
Political satire at a recent Gypsies show: President Kumaratunga
lookalike with the main tsunami aid givers George H. Bush
Senior and Bill Clinton while JVP Minister Anura Kumara Dissanayake
lookalike adjusts the saree of the President lookalike and
Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse lookalike watches. Pic by
Ishara S. Kodikara |
More
than five months after the devastating tsunami, the Government and
the Tiger rebels are on the verge of being united on a Joint Mechanism
to share equitably foreign aid for recovery.
That unity is now almost certain as President Chandrika Bandaranaike
Kumaratunga has made up her mind to say a firm “yes”
to the Norwegian brokered document. But one problem still remains
– her UPFA Government’s junior partner, the Janatha
Vimukthi Peramuna remains opposed to it. They said so during a four
hour long meeting with her on Friday night as reported elsewhere
in this newspaper.
But
pressure is mounting on President Kumaratunga to go ahead. For a
woman who had guided the destinies of this island nation for more
than a decade with great political savvy and disdain from her detractors,
the challenges she would face are formidable.
It
portends both glad tidings and evil omen for her as well as her
now shaky 13 month old United Peoples’ Freedom Alliance (UPFA).
If that is a certainty, what both would face in great measure, whether
its abundance of good luck or ill gotten ignominy remains the critical
question.
First
to the glad tidings. The donor co-chairs, United States, Japan,
the European Community and Norway, are set to meet again. This is
soon after the official announcement that the two sides had agreed
on the JM. In a move to encourage the two sides, the donor co-chairs
are to enhance, at least by another billion dollars, their aid commitment.
At their Tokyo summit they pledged US $ 4.5 billion but linked that
commitment to progress in the peace talks.
Now,
the increased commitment would signal an important message –
that the donor co-chairs were encouraging the two sides to go beyond
sharing tsunami aid. More important among them was to seriously
back Norwegian efforts to re-start the peace talks. That such “kiss
and make up” after protracted shuttle diplomacy by the Norwegians
is salutary enough. More heartening is that fact that it comes amidst
reports of the flow of billions of dollars in aid. That would shore
up share markets and energize an ailing economy. Sri Lanka on the
road to Shangri La, one would say. And what more could one ask?
But
there is a darker side too. It portends evil in equal measure if
not more. Even before they could voice their protests when details
of the JM or as they call it officially a Post Tsunami Operational
Management Structure are made public, the UPFA’s junior partner,
the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), is on a head on collision course
that may see their exit from the UPFA. In fact, the first step in
this direction has already been taken.
The
Politbureau of the JVP which met in emergency session on Thursday
decided at midnight that its four Ministers should keep away from
future Cabinet meetings. The boycott will continue for a month during
which time the JVP expects the Government to withdraw its Cabinet
paper on the re-structuring of the Ceylon Electricity Board and
reverses its decision to accept it. A letter from JVP’s General
Secretary Tilvin Silva containing this ultimatum will go to President
Kumaratunga today.
If
a favourable response is not forthcoming from her, the JVP’s
Central Committee had been called upon to decide on the future course
of action. The mood, quite clearly, was for the JVP to quit the
UPFA – a move that would have seen the birth of a minority
Government. But that was not to be.
President
Kumaratunga who had four hours of talks with a JVP delegation on
Friday night heard of their opposition to the joint mechanism. She
had also learnt of the outcome of the Politbureau meeting. Late
on Friday night, she rang Prime Minister, Mahinda Rajapakse and
asked him to sort out matters.
The
first task for Premier Rajapakse was to talk to trade unions in
the CEB who had declared they would go on strike on Tuesday. This
was to show their protest against the Cabinet decision last Wednesday
to re-structure the CEB. His diplomacy won the day.
Premier
Rajapakse assured the unions that the Government will not go ahead
with last Wednesday’s decision to re-structure the CEB, that
is to convert it into a state owned company with nine branches.
Instead, the unions agreed that a re-structuring of the CEB would
be done retaining its present character and not as a state owned
company. Proposals in this regard are to be formulated within one
month. A written assurance was given by three ministers –Susil
Premajayantha (Power and Energy), Sarath Amunugama (Finance) and
Nimal Siripala de Silva (Health and Nutrition).
Yet,
Tilvin Silva will send his letter today. The JVP wants to receive
the same assurance that was given to the trade unions in writing.
In his letter Silva lists out six reasons why the JVP had decided
on three matters – (1) to demand the invalidation of last
week’s Cabinet decision to re-structure the CEB, (2) for their
Ministers not to take part in Cabinet meetings and (3) to take a
decision on their future role if their demands are not heeded within
one month.
A
Government Minister said last week’s Cabinet decision would
be invalidated. This will be done by the Ministers not approving
this part of the minutes when it comes up for confirmation next
Wednesday.
The
immediate cause for the JVP move is a decision by the Cabinet last
Wednesday to approve a memorandum incorporating details of the CEB
re-structuring. The decision came after the three JVP Ministers
– Anura Dissanayake (Agriculture, Land and Irrigation), Vijitha
Herath (Cultural Affairs and National Heritage), K.D. Lalkantha
(Small and Rural Industries) and Chandrasena Wijesinghe (Fisheries
and Acquatic Resources) – walked out in protest.
JVP
leader Somawansa Amerasinghe told the Politbureau the Cabinet memorandum
had been circulated to Ministers only at 7 pm last Wednesday. He
said it was no different to the previous one though a few changes,
seemingly to appease the JVP, had been incorporated. One was a provision
in the proposed law to give effect to the re-structuring debarring
the privatisation of the CEB without a two thirds majority in Parliament.
Yet, Amerasinghe explained, the move violated policies of the UPFA
where it had been agreed that all contentious issues would be discussed
among the constituent partners.
He
said the JVP was opposed to the move to convert the CEB into a company
with nine branches. There were only a few other changes in the latest
memorandum. When the first was presented to the Cabinet, the JVP
opposition led to a postponement of a decision. It was agreed that
the matter be further discussed. Thereafter, Treasury Secretary
P.B. Jayasundera talked with the JVP. A date was fixed for subsequent
discussions but that had not materialised, Amerasinghe told the
Politbureau.
Last
Wednesday evening it was Minister Anura Dissanayake who raised issue
at the Cabinet. When the memorandum just circulated was taken up,
he declared the JVP was opposed to it on principle. The document
was no different to the one presented by the previous United National
Front (UNF) Government, he pointed out.
His
objections were to see a heated exchange between President Kumaratunga
and Dissanayake. It was in Sinhala. She asked “Apiva Visawaasa
nedda ? Api Horu da?” (Don’t you trust us? Are we rogues?)
“That’s not the issue,” retorted Dissanayake.
Vijitha Herarth turned to power and Energy Minister, Susil Premajayantha
and asked whether he could take the responsibility and give an assurance
there would be no ill effects. Premajayantha went on a long winded
explanation that avoided the specific question. So much so, at one
point Dissanayake pleaded not to embarrass Premajayantha.
That
made Kumaratunga angrier. She told Premajayantha to say he would
take the responsibility and provide an assurance. But nothing was
forthcoming. It was close on 10.30 pm. Finance Minister, Sarath
Amunugama and Media Minister, Mangala Samaraweera chipped into say
there was nothing wrong or sinister in the Cabinet memorandum. Joining
in was Rohitha Bogollagama. But Minister Dinesh Gunawardena made
a plea that a decision be put off. Joining him in the plea was Prime
Minister Mahinda Rajapakse.
But
Kumaratunga insisted a decision should be made that night since
the JVP was not poised to change their stance. Premajayantha declared
a decision could be made even if the JVP chose not to be a party.
The fact that they opposed it could be recorded in the minutes of
the meeting, it was pointed out.
This
saw a walk out of the Cabinet room by the four JVP ministers. There
was a comical moment when they found the door through which they
were to exit closed. It drew a witty quip from Kumaratunga. She
noted that they had been locked in. She seemed cool even during
a crisis.
That
was to see a more interesting development. With the JVP Ministers
not present, the Cabinet proceeded to discuss another controversial
subject which they were opposed to – the Joint Mechanism.
It
was Kumaratunga who started the ball rolling. She said though there
was scare mongering, there was nothing wrong with the JM. The Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) had agreed to it and there was no controversy.
Ministers Anura Yapa Abeywardena and D.E.W. Gunasekera followed,
speaking in favour of it. However, Dinesh Gunawardena said he was
opposed to the merger of the Northern and Eastern provinces. He
said the JM also posed dangers to the Trincomalee port. The Government
machinery was working in most areas. Hence, he felt there was no
need for such a mechanism.
Also
sounding a discordant note was Ferial Ashraff. She said her party
would have to answer to their people. She said that the Muslims
would be badly affected by the move since there was no place for
them. Anura Bandaranaike joined in to say a decision on the matter
should be acceptable to all. Kumaratunga was quick to remind them
that she was doing the right thing.
Even
before the Cabinet meeting last Wednesday, Kumaratunga had begun
a series of hurried consultations. It began when she addressed the
clergy and civil society at a meeting at the BMICH. She did not
give details about the Joint Mechanism but said it was a harmless
arrangement. Presidential advisor Mano Tittawwela read out a three
page document listing out tsunami relief work that had been carried
out.
Then
followed backers of the peace process. Neela Marikkar, an advertising
company boss and a key player of Sri Lanka First, said they were
fully in favour of the JM. Following her was Jehan Perera, head
of the foreign funded NGO, the National Peace Council. Secretary
General of the Peace Secretariat, Jayantha Dhanapala gave an overview
of the peace process.
But
representatives of the clergy had a lot of questions to ask. They
wanted to be convinced of the intricacies of the JM before they
could recommend it to the public. It was decided that another discussion
be held in Kandy on May 20. The venue was picked to enable the Maha
Nayake Theras to participate. The idea is to seek the blessings
of the Sangha for the JM.
If
those blessing are not difficult to come by, there is one that will
be somewhat problematic. That is the blessings of the country’s
main opposition, the United National Party. Its loquacious one time
dentist, Rajitha Senaratne, known for putting his foot in the mouth
with his rhetoric, declared to a newspaper this week that his party
supported the Joint Mechanism.
But
it became clear within hours that his leader, Ranil Wickremasinghe,
had not authorised Senaratne to speak on party policy. Wickremasinghe
was articulating his own position – that the Joint Mechanism
was part of the peace process. Hence, such a mechanism should have
the blessings of all constituent partners of the Government. Now
that the second major partner is on the way out and is opposed to
the Joint Mechanism, the UNP sure has a point to settle scores with
the UPFA.
With
that in mind, insiders say, Wickremasinghe may not respond to a
written request by Kumaratunga to meet her in the coming week to
discuss the Joint Mechanism. The question therefore remains whether
the country is in for good times or bad times, or both. |