Reducing
fiscal profligacy
When the World Bank says that "the fiscal situation remains
under considerable stress”, it implies that if the country
continues along its present path, the economy would go off the rails,
and that tough, unpopular measures are required to prevent that
happening.
That's
the kind of diplomatic language the lending institution has used
to describe the current state of the economy in a new report prepared
for discussion at the forthcoming Sri Lanka Development Forum to
be held in Kandy. It speaks of macro-economic imbalances and the
need for a "sustainable fiscal stance" and of expansionary
monetary policies.
It
is well known that the government has been using the present monetary
policy to keep interest rates low to reduce the cost of funds it
borrows to bridge the budget deficit. The finance ministry is obviously
taking calculated risks in the way it is managing the economy -
almost a gamble - because it has to balance the interests of diverse
sections of the people and often conflicting requirements. Such
risk taking is not unusual and perhaps unavoidable in our case since
we have little financial space within which to manoeuvre given the
precarious nature of our finances and the weaknesses in the economy.
Many
of the problems faced by the country are beyond the government's
control, such as the unprecedented high oil prices which have burnt
a bigger than expected hole in the government's budget. To that
extent the government cannot be faulted for its present predicament.
No
doubt the government would argue that it has to take such calculated
risks in order to ensure fair play in economic management and prevent
the most vulnerable sections of the people from sinking deeper into
poverty, as it is usually they and the middle classes who have to
bear the brunt of 'structural adjustment' that lending agencies
are known to impose on poor countries such as ours. This is why
the government waited for so long to raise fuel prices.
The
government is hoping that inflation could be controlled with time
and that the inflow of foreign funds, especially tsunami aid, will
help shore up our inadequate foreign reserves and strengthen public
finances. But in the meantime depositors and savers have to suffer
negative returns on their hard-earned income.
But
there are also factors which are very much within the government's
control and stuffing the bureaucracy and state-owned enterprises
with its supporters is one of them.
The
World Bank report is sharply critical of the government's continued
reliance on state employment to reduce unemployment. Around 13 percent
of the labour force is employed in the public sector, which means
that Sri Lanka has one of the largest bureaucracies in the developing
world. It describes as "worrisome" the rising wage bill.
It is well known that this government, even more than the previous
one, is using large-scale recruitment to the state sector as one
way of reducing unemployment and pacifying its supporters.
Many
state organizations are overflowing with people, who sometimes do
not even have a place to sit. The World Bank says that there is
significant scope for reducing spending on the overstaffed and inefficient
public administration and that there is an urgent need to improve
targeting of welfare programmes to better reach the poor, through
objective eligibility criteria. It says that "strong political
commitment" is needed to address such issues as overstaffing,
wastage and administrative fragmentation and duplication. That political
backbone appears to be exactly what this government lacks.
These
issues will do doubt be thrashed out at the aid forum later this
month and the government will most likely come under strong pressure
to reduce its profligacy. |