When
the blind lead the blind
By S. R. Pathiravithana
On Thursday our neighbours at the other end of the Bay of Bengal
set foot in Sri Lanka for their official tour of three one-dayers
and two Tests. Upon their arrival their present coach and our Ex.
Davnell Whatmore had quipped that they are ready to beat Sri Lanka
in their own den. However just a moment! This is not a harangue
about that quip of Whatmore but, an expression of a view that may
have prompted him to speak out so loudly.
Coming
out more bluntly, after the Sri Lanka under 15 team had lost to
Bangladesh here in Sri Lanka a few moons ago, now our under seventeen
national team have repeated that same feat in a shameful manner
while taking part in a tournament in Malaysia -- failing to score
a mere 108 runs for a win. Then in their second engagement in the
same tournament, Bangladesh thrashed Sri Lanka once again by a huge
margin of seven wickets.
One
thing is crystal clear; Sri Lanka’s junior cricket at present
is not in a steady decline but at a nose dive powered by high octane
gasoline. First, the under 15 and the under 17 teams slide to degrading
defeats to Bangladesh. Parallel to that the Sri Lanka under nineteeners
go to England with an underaged team and make a bloody hash of it.
What
on earth has brought about this pathetic situation to Sri Lanka
junior cricket? About two decades ago the Sri Lanka juniors were
among the best or better than the rest in the world. Ironically
today even the minnows of world cricket are making us the laughing
stock.
Just
upon their arrival in the island after the severe thrashing that
they received at the hands of the English teenagers, the Sri Lanka
under 19 team manager went on record admitting that overall English
cricket at this level is improving vastly. If they have improved
leaps and bounds at junior level where has our cricket gone? Has
it gone on reverse gear? Your answer is as good as mine!
There
was a time when Sri Lanka had names like Bandula Warnapura, Duleep
Mendis , Roy Dias, Ajith de Silva or much later Asanka Gurusinghe,
Roshan Mahanama, Aravinda de Silva making national tours in the
same line up. But, today in any of these squads can you point out
one single player who will be an automatic choice for the senior
team?
To
get a better insight into the matter The Sunday Musings sought the
assistance of a past cricketer who had played the game at the highest
level and who is also a junior coach, curator and an umpire at the
highest level. The former cricketer said “It is indeed a sad
plight. But what about the Sri Lanka Schools Cricket Association?
How
many incumbent officials have played the game at a decent level
and how many have a proper coaching background? To guide the future
generation of cricketers the men at the top too should have a good
insight of the game, if not the endproduct will be not of good quality!”
Then
Musings turned to the Sri Lanka Schools Cricket Association and
asked them as to how they managed to come up with an under 17 team
with these credentials. The secretary of the SLSCA, M.T.A. Rauff
was good enough to explain the situation on their behalf. He said
“Initially there are four age groups under which we conduct
tournaments--Under 13, Under 15, Under 17 and Under 19. The executive
committee of the SLSCA is also responsible for the selection committees
and we have selected five officials from the SLSCA as selectors.
They are either masters’-in-charge or school coaches. The
criteria that we look into about these persons are that they should
either posses some-kind of a coaching certificate or they should
be the cricket coaches in their respective schools”
Rauff
continued “As to the under seventeen squad that went to Malaysia,
when we first commenced the selection only 5 or 6 matches in the
tournament were completed and we initially called players who had
scored centuries and bowlers who had taken over five wickets in
certain matches and held the initial trials. At the second stage
we invited players who had scored 150 runs in the tournament so
far and bowlers who had taken thirteen wickets or more. Then we
had 40 players that went through 5 trial matches with at least two
trials per player.”
“At
the same time we had two players namely Madhawa Warnapura and Ashan
Priyanjan who were stand-by players for the under 19 tour of England
– players who were selected by the national selectors. So
even though these two players did not do well in the trials they
became automatic choices on the strength of being players who were
hand-picked by the national selectors. At the same time we were
looking more towards players with all-round abilities, so in the
pool there may have been better batsmen and better bowlers, but
we gave preference to players with all-round ability”.
Oh
Blimey! They select a national squad leaving behind better batsmen
and better bowlers and lay emphasis on all-rounders – or else
the Jack-of-all-trades and masters of none. Come on Mr. SLSCA you
must get your priorities correct. Sometime ago speaking to these
same columns the Chairman of the Sri Lanka Cricket Committee, Arjuna
Ranatunge said that his committee along with the new Sri Lanka cricket
coach Tom Moody are contemplating taking a very close look at the
junior cricket structure in the country in order to take some meaningful
remedial measures. We feel the time is ripe now. If this situation
is allowed on further even a junior team from Bermuda will beat
Sri Lanka in its own den and ten years later one can just imagine
what would happen to our senior cricket.
|