Millennium
Goals thru’ rural development
There are several reasons why Sri Lanka could get complacent about
the Millennium Development Goals (MDG). First of these reasons is
the fact that Sri Lanka has surpassed most of the MDGs. Second is
the distraction from such programmes owing to the preoccupation
with electoral politics.
Although
the election campaigns would talk of achieving even higher and impossible
goals, the implementation of concrete programmes would be delayed.
And third, the general incapacity to implement policies will result
in tardiness in implementing them especially in the remote areas
where such implementation is needed. At the national level Sri Lanka
has achieved the millennium goals in literacy and school enrolment,
gender equality, life expectancy and other health indicators. Poverty,
however, remains a serious problem with about one fourth of the
population being below the poverty line.
The
real problems in the country are in the remote regions and in several
provinces. There are vast differences in the achievements at the
national level and at regional and provincial levels.
Therefore
there is a need to focus on regional disparities. This concern should
be the guiding principle in the selection of projects and the areas
in the country where these would be located. The last budget had
a thrust on developing infrastructure in the less developed provinces.
Has this policy been effectively implemented?
Are
we on the road to developing the less developed provinces or are
these mere promises that are not implemented? Sub-national goals
are indeed essential to make the MDGs meaningful to the people left
behind. We must not allow the reasonably good national achievements
to hide the problems in these provinces. While the urban areas have
high social development indicators they must not be allowed to conceal
the pockets of poverty and social underdevelopment. Further progress
at a national level should be achieved by regional disparities being
reduced. If there was little progress in the poorer provinces, national
achievements would be tardy. Therefore such sub national goals should
be set and progress monitored.
Infrastructure
improvement in the five least developed provinces should be a priority.
For instance the goal must be to have schools in nearby locations
so that no child is deprived of primary education owing to the lack
of easy access.
Similarly,
there is a need to establish health centres and hospitals in close
proximity. Goals must be specified in terms of a doctor: population
ratio that ensures at least basic adequacy of medical services,
especially maternal and postnatal care. This would be an extension
of the idea of sub-national goals that should be advocated. Specific
goals for improvement of infrastructure by 2010 and then 2015 must
be set and monitored. Otherwise the thrust in regional development
would be mere talk without accomplishment.
Economic
growth alone will not achieve the MDGs, especially at regional level.
The East Asian experience illustrates how rapid growth with re-distributive
policies reduced poverty and helped improve social development.
The
South Asian experience, on the other hand, is illustrative of both
inadequate growth to reduce poverty and a lack of appropriate policies
to pass on the growth to the poor. The economic growth strategy
should focus on rural infrastructure development and adopt pro-poor
policies such as agrarian reforms, support for rural industry and
rural infrastructure development if the MDG's are to be achieved
in rural areas.
With
respect to achieving the goals of literacy and education two issues
should be noted. First the goals should attempt to go beyond literacy
and primary education and schooling. This is especially so as Sri
Lanka no longer has employment opportunities for those with literacy
and primary education.
Therefore
for the poor to increase their income, educational opportunities
such as in learning foreign languages, vocational skills and information
technology are needed. The lack of such facilities in remote areas
is a reason for continued high unemployment, low incomes and poverty
that defy the achievement of the range of MDGs.
The
second issue in education relates to the quality of education. Having
schools of low quality would not achieve the MDGs. Qualitative goals
should be set so that quantitative goal realization is not misleading.
The attainment of the MDG goals at the national level should not
lead to complacency. Further attainments in these goals must be
a national commitment.
|