Our
fate is decided today, let's have perspective
It's a piece of real estate. One third the size of Sri Lanka --
but it’s a piece of land. South of Sri Lanka, we know that
this estate does not bring us anything in terms of bounty; no coconuts
from up there, not even a few onions as it used to be. But, it's
a paralyzing liability. We line up troops to secure its borders,
we almost pawn out future generations to keep it intact.
Are
we prepared to annihilate ourselves for the sakes of this national
heirloom? Today, we will know, we are told. We have to await the
arrival of -- in terms of its gravity -- the near Papal pronouncement
on our fate by Velupillai Prabhakaran, supremeo, decider of all
fates, giver of life and death in this country.
It’s
all for the sake of this one liability - - the north and the east
of our land. As a nation, we can be likened to men who cannot control
their bladder movements. They are wet when they do not want to be,
we are at war when we do not want to be.
Will
a Rajapakse government within its first ten days have the reality
of war at its doorstep? Probably not. In one way, it's all the sabre
rattling that's killing us. Sri Lanka's viability as a country for
international journalists is if this nation produces headlines,
sound bytes and video clips.
The
hardline label that is being fixed on to the new President's shirt
therefore has more to do with headlines. International journalists
want catchy ones. Some of the catchiest ones in today's media game
have to do with saying that politicians have become warlike, that
they are hawks and hardliners. After Rajapakse was elected, the
LTTE therefore did not have to raise a finger. When the North east
vote was boycotted, and Rajapakse was elected winner, the LTTE's
work was done by the international media which has given the Tiger
leader and his men more publicity that they could have had if they
hired the best public relations con artistes of this world.
All
of which goes to prove it once more. In the north and the east,
we are dealing with a piece of land. It is as bad a liability as
a piece of fallow real estate which gives us nothing except big
bills for its upkeep. Why aren't we selling it off?
But
yet, our national psyche is sourced around the myth of this land,
the protection of which we are told is the fountainhead of Sinhala
pride. Entire election stories are woven around it. The rationale
for our very existence is filtered through the legends associated
with the upkeep of this huge liability.
Thirty
years from now, when grainy pictures are sold of the 2005 presidential
election, we will have men who wore shawls around their necks standing
around , looking pleased about their victory, as they should be.
It's the Bandaranaike revolution in miniature repeated in the 21st
century multi media.
This
story is separate from the other story that is associated with this
piece of land. Rajapakse was able to win the Sri Lankan elections
after having nailed down and boarded the Bandaranaike myth. This
is a stupendous achievement. It's not just a log cabin to President's
house story but one of epic proportions in terms of the political
theater it has generated.
But,
all of it is being coloured by the fact that there is another story;
the story that has to do with people not being allowed to vote in
the other part of the country that is a liability to us. Mahinda
Rajapakse's inspirational victory is being barracked with some fairness
in some quarters because it strictly did not happen if the Northeastern
votes are taken into account.
Which
is one more reason to say that this piece of land I'm talking about
is a liability which does not allow us to conduct our affairs, and
retain our own narratives the way they should be.
Rajapakse's
own fight with the Bandaranaikes mimicked the ongoing struggle that
this country's poor and unkempt hordes lead every day with the Colombo
centric upper crust who look at problems with their blinkered Colombo
centric glasses. Rajapakse's final usurpation of the Bandaranaikes
from the Bandaranaike-party was the outline sketch for the larger
class struggle which was symbolically won at these elections.
Now, as if to prove that this story has the utility of a classic
to it, there is a rearguard that has also appeared.
Sometimes,
this rearguard can assert itself, and that's the problem.
Shades of this rearguard are comic, for instance the fact that Chandrika
Bandaranaike wants to come back to parliament as backbencher - -
as it has been quipped, to join the 'mulberry group' against Rajapakse.
To the comic fallout can be added the fact that there is a whole
book-binder of an apology made for Ranil Wickremesinghe from all
of the opportunistic tracts that are being written on his behalf.
This serial loser is being supported by vested interests that do
not want to face upto the fact that he led the so many lakhs of
minorities who voted for him down the drainpipe.
They
say so many minorities braved the LTTE's deathly-stare to vote for
Wickremesinghe, and that he should not stand down because they are
waiting to hold his hand. It's the other way about. Wickremesinghe
let these minorities down, because a proper leader will not depend
on the minorities alone, but will know how to carry the minority
vote and run with it and win the election with something from the
majority voters as well.
Like
everybody else, the minority wants a winner who is expected to do
the possible which is to win both Sinhala and Tamil votes -- not
do the impossible and win with Tamil votes only. Wickremesinghe
could not do that. He had outlived his usefulness. In actual fact,
they are trying to see whether he has finally outlived his uselessness
-- and is ready, improbably, at the tail end of his political career
to be useful. How do they live in such hope all the time, when Wickremesinghe
manages unerringly all the time to dash their hopes -- unless of
course they are closet progressives, fifth-columnists who see Wickremesinghe's
continued leadership as the UNP's surest way to the grave??
But,
the rearguard ambles-on, fifth columnists or not. When Maithripala
Sirisena went with a request to the ex-president Kumaratunge to
have her signature on a piece of paper nominating Dallas Allahaperuma
for the seat of the departed Lakshman Kadirgamar, Mangala Samaraweera
was witness. Kumaratunge scoffed, and said "what nonsense that
seat is for me.'' She stood like the rock of Gibraltar against any
reason.
How
does this happen to one of the most democratic and progressive leaders
this country has had in years? It’s as if she has been possessed
by the force -- the force of the rearguard, the striking back of
the empire of aliens, foreign interests and NGOs. Sooner she extricates
herself from that particular soup, the less she will look like one
teary petulant tomato.
|