SAGT
loses first option on new port berths
South Asia Gateway Terminals (SAGT) has lost first right of refusal
for four berths of the proposed deep draft Colombo South Harbour,
as the Sri Lanka Ports Authority has not informed the terminal operator
of a decision to build the breakwater for the new port within the
period specified in the concession agreement.
The
development allows the government to call for competitive bids,
without negotiating solely with SAGT, for the first container terminals
in the planned port, which is critical for Colombo’s survival
as a transshipment hub. Other companies and international multi-port
operators are known to be interested in Colombo’s New South
Harbour, given its proximity to the main East-West trade route across
the Indian Ocean and the booming Indian economy, the main source
of transshipment cargo for Colombo.
Some
multi-port operators have even sent teams to hold talks with the
Board of Investment. Under the concession agreement signed between
the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA) and SAGT in August 1999, SAGT
was offered the first right of refusal to build four berths in the
Colombo South Harbour on the seaward side of its existing Queen
Elizabeth Quay (QEQ) terminal. Port Ministry officials said that
for this to be effective, the SLPA was required to inform SAGT of
the government’s decision to build the breakwater for the
new South Harbour within 75 months of the date of QEQ’s hand
over.
That
period has now expired, according to an Attorney General’s
Department official, with the government yet to make a formal announcement
on building the breakwater.
SAGT,
in which the P&O Group and the John Keells Holdings conglomerate
each have 26.25 percent stakes, along with equity investments by
SLPA, Evergeen and multilateral lenders, took over QEQ on September
1999.
The
ADB has promised part of the funds for the three-km breakwater,
which along with dredging, is expected to cost US$300 million, and
the government is seeking the balance money.
AG’s
Department and port officials said the new development allows the
government to get the best terms for building the first berths in
the new Colombo South Harbour by calling for open competitive bids.
SAGT CEO Maciek Kwiatkowski said the terminal operator still supported
the South Harbour project.
“We
support it and we’re keen to see it start as soon as possible,”
he said.
He said SAGT had not been informed about the current status of plans
to start building the new port or that SAGT had lost the first right
of refusal on the four berths.
For
the first berth to be ready by 2009 work must start early next year
and industry officials have said the government should fast-track
the project.
Otherwise, Colombo risks losing its hub status, with adverse effects
on the port and exporters and the island’s attractiveness
for foreign investment.
“If the government does not go ahead with the South Harbour,
we would have a capacity crunch by the year 2009,” declared
Dr. Parakrama Dissanayake, Chairman of Aitken Spence Shipping and
former chairman of SLPA.
He
suggested the BOI with SLPA could use it as the flagship project
to attract foreign investment. Colombo has increased annual capacity
to 3.3 million TEUs (Twenty-foot Equivalent Units or containers)
with the entry of SAGT and consequent improved efficiency at the
Jaya Container Terminal.
“SAGT
made a positive contribution towards the development of Colombo
Port. SLPA may not have enhanced its efficiency levels if not for
the international standards established by SAGT,” said Dr
Dissanayake. But with annual demand forecast to grow as 10-12 percent,
demand is expected to outpace capacity by end-2008.
Colombo’s
present infrastructure will not be able to handle the huge new container
vessels capable of carrying over 8,000 TEUs that are now being deployed
on the East-West trade route. The loss of direct port calls by big
ships could have serious economic implications with industrial exports,
which make up three-fourths of exports, being badly affected, especially
garments which are highly “transit sensitive”, Dr Dissanayake
said.
“These
products are bound to become non-competitive. Having direct shipping
services will be essential in attracting investors to choose Sri
Lanka as a possible location for manufacturing. Besides we would
incur additional costs to feeder export/import traffic and face
loss of transhipment revenues.”
|