US
strips Lanka of garment cover
From Duruthu Edirimuni at the WTO conference in Hong Kong
The US has backtracked on a pledge it gave earlier this year to
grant Sri Lanka duty free access to its huge apparels industry,
Commerce Minister Jeyeraj Fernandopulle told The Sunday Times yesterday.
The
US is Sri Lanka's largest export market and the destination for
US$ 1.8 billion ( Rs. 180 billion ) or as much as 38 per cent of
exports, which are predominantly garments. Sri Lanka's garment industry
is heavily dependent on the US with 63 per cent of all garment exports
bound for the US.
Minister
Fernandopulle said the US had initially agreed to give Sri Lanka
the same LDC (least developed countries) concessions, taking into
consideration the effect last December's tsunami had on the country's
economy. "But they have backtracked now and the chances are
remote," he said.
"We
met officials from the US and have discussed the situation with
them. We will be requesting the G-14 country ambassadors and the
Sri Lanka ambassador in Washington to lobby for Sri Lanka,"
he added.Mr. Fernandopulle, representing Sri Lanka at the World
Trade Organisation (WTO) ministerial conference here told The Sunday
Times that Sri Lanka had now joined the G-14, which is a group of
least developed countries (LDCs), to negotiate trade policies with
the US.
"Now
it is called the G-14 + 1, because Sri Lanka has joined the group",
he said. The main concern at present for Sri Lanka is to pressurise
the US for duty-free access for its apparels,” he pointed
out.
According
to a WTO Secretariat report on Sri Lanka's trade policies and practices,
reforms have gradually shifted towards broad-based economic liberalization,
but the US trade deficit with Sri Lanka was US$ 1.7 billion in 2003,
an increase of US$ 14 million from 2002.
Meanwhile,
Sri Lankan delegates are doubtful of a deal at the WTO Ministerial
Conference, which ends over the weekend, but said Sri Lanka will
not be vulnerable in such a situation because of its more liberal
trade policies compared to other developing economies.
Dr.
Saman Kelegama, who was in Hong Kong representing the Sri Lankan
academia, told The Sunday Times that it was "highly unlikely"
that there would be a concrete deal, but Sri Lanka would not be
impacted badly.
“Sri Lanka has a more mature, liberalised economy than other
developing countries.
“Therefore,
the WTO-based trade liberalisation does not have much impact and,
as is the consensus among many developing nations, ‘no deal
is better than a bad deal’,” he said. Sri Lanka stands
out as one of the most liberal trade regimes in South Asia, with
her main trade policy instrument being import tariffs.
Dr.
Kelegama said that during the past decade, market opening to manufactured
imports was accompanied by internal deregulation and privatisation,
while foreign direct investment played an important role in developing
the clothing and tourism industries.He said that a stalemate in
Hong Kong would prompt a further proliferation of bilateral and
regional agreements between developing nations and LDCs, which was
a threat to the WTO.
Bilateral
co-operation is an important element of Sri Lanka's foreign trade
policy. Bilateral co-operation agreements have been signed with
several countries such as China, India, Pakistan, Romania, Iran,
Bangladesh, Egypt, Turkey, Kuwait and Cyprus.
|