Tsunami
gold chain horror:Murder charges against suspects
By Gamini Mahadura
The parents of a Galle tsunami victim whose gold chain was snatched
by two bystanders while she was drowning, yesterday welcomed moves
by the Police and the Attorney General’s Department to follow
up the case through video evidence and frame murder charges against
those responsible for the crime.
The
moving pictures of the woman drowning after being caught in the
first wave, rescued by two bystanders and again being caught in
the second wave and finally two other bystanders snatching the gold
chain was captured on video camera of journalist Ajantha Samarawickrama,
Galle correspondent for our sister paper ‘Lankadeepa’
and Independent Television Network.
The unfortunate victim was identified as 35-year-old Desika Kalyani,
a spinster from Ginigewatta in Ratgama, the fourth in a family of
seven.
Attorney General S.C. Kamalasabeyson had requested Galle High Court
Judge Chandrasena Rajapakse to take up the matter as a murder case
on a priority basis.
Accordingly
the two men who were arrested and remanded on January 17 were produced
in courts and released on a cash bail of Rs. 50,000 each and Rs.
500,000 personal bail each.
On
seeing the photographs of the incident in our sister paper ‘Lankadeepa’,
Galle police HQI of the anti-vice squad, Chief Inspector Sarath
Mendis who was the brains behind the whole operation, went all out
to arrest not only the duo who took her chain away but also the
two others who first took her out of the water and placed her on
the pavement near the Galle bus terminus, with her chain intact.
All
four were arrested after a painstaking investigation by this conscientious
police officer who came in for praise for a job well done. After
the two men were remanded, Chief Inspector Mendis had sought advice
from the Attorney General on charging them for murder after theft
of a chain. He was well armed with the relevant video tapes, photographs
and other documents and accounts from witnesses gathered by him.
This
case will go down in the history of our courts as one which was
concluded sans a post mortem where the body was not available. It
will also be the first where no witnesses were called other than
evidence on film and on video tapes.
The
story of the dead woman is a sad tale. She is said to have suffered
from a chest illness which stalled her education while in Grade
4. She was employed in the coir industry to help her poor parents.
Her sister-in-law had died while giving birth to her third child,
which made her brother commit suicide. It fell on her to educate,
feed and look after his children too, which explains why she remained
a spinster.
Desika
fell victim to the tsunami at the Galle bus stand while accompanying
her niece Duleeka Jayamali to see a woman who was conducting cake-making
classes. At first it was Duleeka who was swept away by the first
wave. Desika had gone further when the water receded in search of
Jayamali when the second wave of the deadly tsunami swept her away
too.
It
was at this time the first two young men had rescued and brought
her to the pavement near the Galle bus stand. Just then the second
duo had come there with one of them saying to the other ‘hey,
this woman is not dead’. Then while attempting to administer
mouth-to-mouth resuscitation one of them had seen the chain round
her neck. Thereupon he had tried to snatch the gold chain when his
accomplice tried to do so too. The result was that the chain broke
in two. Desika was alive at that moment, but the men were more interested
in the gold chain rather than in saving her life. So they threw
her back into the water and fled the scene.
Chief
Inspector Mendis told The Sunday Times “I studied the photographs
of the men well and it helped me to identify one. He had a history
of looting and taking drugs. He had moved away from his home town
and when arrested he was in possession of the broken chain. On the
day of the tsunami he had robbed Rs. 35,000 from a shop. I was able
to locate the clothes he wore on that day. Grilling him at length
I was able to arrest the second man together with the clothes he
wore on that day. He had pawned the part of the chain he grabbed
from the dying woman”.
The
woman’s mother had identified the broken chain as that of
her daughter’s while a torn portion of the dress worn by the
woman was shown by the mother to the police officer who produced
all these in court as documents to substantiate the case.
P.Jayalath
Nona (63), Desika’s mother said “It was this daughter
who provided for us and the children of my dead son. She worked
hard at her job to sustain us and only God above knows this. We
identified the dead from photographs displayed at the Karapitiya
hospital. If not for this police officer the story behind my daughter’s
death would never have come to light.
I
am sure the chain was snatched while she was still alive. I have
seen five photographs of that scene and it is evident that it was
in a brutal manner that the snatchers pulled her chain from her
neck. It is a pity that she lost her life due to a chain worth two
sovereigns only.”
Her
father D.Jayaneris (66) had this to say “I am a paralytic
and my wife is blind. After we lost our daughter, we were left destitute.
It was my daughter who assisted me while I was suffering from paralysis
and brought some relief to me. After her demise I became worse and
now I cannot walk.
I have
to spend about Rs. 2100 monthly on my medicine and we get only Rs.
15,000 from the Government plus another Rs. 5000 I only request
that proper investigations be made regarding my daughter’s
death and we be given help to live on. We are happy the authorities
have pursued the case by studying the videos and taking action against
the culprits.”
|