Sri Lanka’s
last chance
Nottingham possibly the most historic and picturesque
of the venues of Sri Lanka’s test matches, was readying itself
to host the 3rd and final test. Famous for the story of Robin Hood
the well known outlaw of the world in the 12th century, the Sherwood
Forest appears to be still very much intact with its tall and the
famous oak trees. The Nottingham Castle occupied by the then, law
of the area the Sheriff, is now a magnificent museum carrying some
brilliant paintings and tremendously rare architecture.
|
England bowler Liam Plunkett (L) celebrates
after taking the wicket of Sri Lankan batsman Chamara Kapugedera
for 14 runs, caught by Andrew Strauss during the first day of
the third cricket test match at Trent Bridge, in Nottingham.-AFP |
As for the cricket the Sri Lankans had no practice
game and after an unexpected extra day of rest, the Nottingham Test
was their last opportunity to draw level with the hosts, who incidentally
had not lost the last nine N power series. Looking back at the series,
the Lord’s test showed the fighting spirit of the Sri Lankans
with the batsmen performing when it matters. However, the Birmingham
Test was an absolute give away. It is very clear that the decision
to bat first and the team selection left much to be desired. As
a result of it England weren’t stretched and their excellent
home record maintained.
The 3rd test at Trent Bridge which has the reputation
for its excellent batting surfaces should give the Sri Lankans plenty
of heart and should look at taking the fight to the English camp
rather than just playing to save the game. It was widely expected
that the Lankan line up will see a few changes and the most obvious
one was the re inclusion of Sanath Jayasuriya! Some of the other
changes expected were the exit of Samaraweera and Kulasekara and
the possible inclusion of Kapugedeara or the retention of Tharanga
and the recall of the leg spinner Malinga Bandara. Whilst the changing
in the batting was made for some odd reason Tom Moody seem to have
very little faith in the ability of Malinga Bandara who is a very
fine leg spinner and a more than useful batsman.
Once again the Sri Lankan captain did themselves
a great favour with the toss and the decision to bat first this
time seem to be the correct one. But after the 2nd wicket stand
was broken with a rather poor decision handed out to Sangakkara
by umpire Darrel Hair, the rest of the batting was both spineless
and appalling. The Sri Lankans appeared to be cruising at 84 for
2 with the sun shining brilliantly. In fairness the pitch at Trent
Bridge had hardly any movement after the first hour and the likes
of Hoggard and Jon Lewis was made to look so plain and pedestrian.
But what happened afterwards was the most unbelievable bit of batting.
Geoff Boycott’s comments
The former England opener Geoff Boycott commenting
on the Sri Lankan batting on Test Match Special commentary said
“They haven’t learnt from the mistakes they made earlier.
They don’t seem to be able to overcome them, repeating it
every time they come to the middle. To me Chaminda Vaas seems to
be the best organized player as he always gets in to line when facing
both Pace and Spin” “ The top order should attempt to
take a leaf out of Vaas’s book.”
I am afraid it is sad, but unfortunately a true
interpretation of the Sri Lankan batting on the tour so far.
In short, another opportunity was squandered!
It will be very hard to get back on even keel unless we have the
strength and ability to strike back. To begin with, the first innings
begged a score in excess of 300 which was definitely within the
batsmen’s reach. Had that been achieved, then the bowlers
would have had a good opportunity to have a go at the English batsmen
and even apply some pressure.
But instead what seem to happen is a rather meek
surrender followed by the dominance of the likes of Pietersen who
appears to have got the measure of the Sri Lankan bowling, Muralitharan
and Vaas included.
|