Bush
visit exposes sham sovereignty in Iraq
Iraq's so-called democracy — and its political
sovereignty — is one of the biggest frauds perpetrated on
the international community. Bush's stealth visit to Baghdad under
cover of darkness was a telling comment on Iraq: a hoax that is
being passed off as one of the prime examples of an emerging new
democracy in the Middle East.
NEW YORK- Afghanistan and Iraq are two countries
run by puppet governments beholden to the United States. The military
occupation of both countries — whose governments are protected
by US and coalition forces — is starkly obvious to the international
community at large.
Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai is a quisling
collaborating with an occupying force. But he still remains a prisoner
in his own presidential palace surrounded by an army of American-trained
and American-supplied bodyguards in a country where the domestic
insurgency is threatening to escalate.
The US military, which was planning to hand over
the country to Western forces of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO), is now having second thoughts, fearing that European and
Canadian troops may not succeed in containing a new urban guerrilla
warfare involving a growing number of recent suicide attacks and
roadside bombings, Iraq-style.
In Iraq, the US has manoeuvred to install a new
puppet Prime Minister, Nouri Kamal al-Maliki, who received a surprise
visitor in the person of US President George W. Bush who quickly
flew in and out of Baghdad last week to shore up support for the
new government.
The symbolic gesture was primarily meant as a
public relations exercise to boost the morale of not only the new
Iraqi government but also the ruling Republican Party in the US
which is in danger of losing the upcoming elections in November.
The political hot potato at the polls would be America's disastrous
military involvement in Iraq, which passed a milestone last week
with the US death toll hitting the tragic 2,500 mark.
Compared to Afghanistan, Iraq has a veneer of
democracy considering the fact that it elected its legislators —
but the elections took place under a tightly-controlled, military-occupied
country. The polls in Iraq were no showcase for the principles of
Jeffersonian democracy the US proudly preaches overseas.
Iraq's so-called democracy — and its political
sovereignty — is one of the biggest frauds perpetrated on
the international community. Bush's stealth visit to Baghdad under
cover of darkness was a telling comment on Iraq: a hoax that is
being passed off as one of the prime examples of an emerging new
democracy in the Middle East.
A sharp observer of the international political
scene wrote a letter to the New York Times last week putting the
visit in context when he rightly pointed out that Bush's trip was
kept a secret even from Prime Minister al-Maliki until the last
possible moment. This, he argued, was clearly an "unwitting
demonstration of US domination in Iraq."
In what country, the writer asked, could an American
president land his plane without the knowledge of that country's
leader? Obviously, it could happen only in a country "occupied"
by the US military. "Only in a state whose airspace we control.
Only in a state without real government autonomy and authority —
like Iraq," the writer rightly declared.
Meanwhile, the latest public opinion in 14 countries
by the Pew Global Attitudes Project (PGAP) concluded that the Iraq
war had made the world "more dangerous" than before the
US invasion of that country more than three years ago.
The strongly negative opinions came from 12 of
the 14 foreign countries surveyed, with strong pluralities of 44
percent (in Russia and China) to majorities of up to 76 percent
(in France). The only exceptions were India and Nigeria where pluralities
of 41 percent of respondents said the world had been made "safer"
after the US invasion of Iraq.
The large majorities were clear indications that
the US image overseas remains tainted both by the war in Iraq and
also the global war on terrorism. In 10 of the 14 countries, there
was an overwhelming belief that the world had been rendered "more
dangerous" by the US invasion.
With the exception of Germany and Japan, the respondents
in the rest of the surveyed countries believed that the continued
US presence in Iraq constituted a greater danger to world peace
than the presumed nuclear ambitions of Iran or North Korea. Surprisingly,
respondents in Britain, one of America's closest military allies,
rated the US presence in Iraq as a greater danger than Iran by a
41-34 percent margin.
The survey of nearly 17,000 people also included
nationals of five predominantly Islamic countries — Egypt,
Indonesia, Pakistan, Jordan, and Turkey — along with Britain,
France, Germany, Spain, Japan and the US. In France, the percentage
with a favourable opinion of the US fell from 63 percent in 2002
to 43 percent in 2003; in Indonesia, it fell from 61 percent to
15 percent; and in Jordan, from 25 percent to just one percent.
The only countries in which the US image appears
to have continued to rebound were China (from 42 percent favourable
last year to 47 percent) and Pakistan (from 23 percent to 27 percent).
|