Court rejects
petition, calls for action against petitioners
By Teles Anandappa
The Supreme Court refused leave to proceed in
a fundamental rights petition filed regarding the nomination of
members to the public service.
The petitioners, Dr. A.C. Visvalingam of Rajagiriya
and General Gerry de. Silva of Colombo cited the Attorney General,
Secretary to the President Lalith Weeratunga and 22 others as respondents.
The petitioners said that in a democratic country
the political executive is not given unlimited powers and that the
Legislature and the Judiciary exercise certain controls over the
Executive.
The petitioners also said there is protection
for public officials from ministers who are required to act according
to the law and not according to their whims and fancies. The protection
of the public service against ministers can be assured through politically
independent state services and an efficient bureaucracy wherein
recruitment is through merit and not on the basis of political patronage,
the petitioners said.
They said abuses and excesses relating to over-politicisation
had manifested themselves in many different forms and guises. They
are political interference in the day-to-day administration of government
institutions, abuse of political power in the awarding of public
contracts, issue of licences and in various privatisation deals.
politicisation of recruitment, promotion, transfer, dismissal and
disciplinary control in state services at all levels and the abuse
of political power in the undermining of democratic institutions
and process such as the Police, Elections Dept. and the public service
.
The petitioners said the appointments made by
the President bypassing the Constitutional Council are irregular
and unconstitutional and therefore their fundamental rights guaranteed
by the Constitution have been infringed. The Bench comprising Justices
N. Jayasinghe,N. Udalagama and Rajah Fernando refused leave to proceed
and was of the view that in the course of the petitioners’
lawyer Elmore Perera’s submission he said he is not only addressing
court but also the people of the country.
It seemed to Court that his application has been
filed for frivolous and vexatious considerations. Court directed
the Attorney General to consider whether any action is warranted
against the petitioners for wasting the time of court and for abuse
of process.
Deputy Solicitor General P.A. Ratnayake with Senior
State Counsel Nerin Pulle appeared for the Attorney General.
|