Of silk
and ermine
By Nihal K. M. Perera
I remember the young man, dark in aspect, overconfident
in attitude, brash in style, electric in the spread of vibes, speeding
along the streets of Colombo, in his red and somewhat-battered Karman
Ghia, as if he were in a hurry to reach some indeterminate destination.
Some thirty five years later, he had sped, with
the same expediency with which he piloted his Karman Ghia, from
an obscure teaching temple in Rosmead Place, where he read the alphabet
of law, to the inner sanctum of the apex temple of justice on St.
Sebastian Hill.
Here on July 7, he will respond to the traditional
injunction issued forth by a Ceremonial Bench of the Supreme Court,
“Do you move, Hemantha Warnakulasuriya?”, and then take
his seat in the Inner Bar, decked in silk and ermine.
Warnakulasuriya is not the traditional stuff of
silk and ermine.
Born in the deep South, a son to W. P. Arnolis Appu, the Aristotle
Onassis of carriage of goods by road, in the then Ceylon, Warnakulasuriya,
like the visionary men of valour of the south Hinniappuhamys, Dasas,
Edmunds and Wijewardenes, who headed for Colombo to be leaders of
business and enterprise and captains of trade and industry, set
his sights on Colombo in pursuit of education and eminence.
At age 19 he was the President of the All Ceylon
Lorry Owners’ Association that thrust upon him, at such an
impressionable age, qualities of leadership, toughness of resolve
and muscle and moral intrepidity that stood him in good stead in
the pursuit of a career that he was later to choose.
Warnakulasuriya enthused in the traditions of
art, culture, drama and mores of the deep South, to which disciplines
he was naturally heir, and he was in the thick of the thriving dramatic
revival of the time, at or about which he left school. Royal College
could not succeed in dampening Warnakulasuriya’s inherent
enthusiasm in things traditional and cultural.
Straight from school he joined ‘Ape Kattiya’
that the enormously talented Sugathapala de Silva founded, and was
one of the leading ‘dramatis personae’ in “Harima
Badu Hayak”.
Warnakulasuriya wrote extensively on all manner
of things that spoke to the conscience of the nation. He wrote with
affection of Wickramasinghe, Sarachchandra and Amarasekera. He wrote
with sensitivity on “Maname” and “Sinhabahu”.
He wrote with anger on the banning of “Aksharaya”. He
wrote with indignation of the murder of Liyanarachchi and the rape
of Inoka Gallage. He wrote with Freudian-depth of pornography in
art and literature. He wrote with sadness on the declining standards
of legal practice, and with compassion on the ill-equipped young
lawyers struggling at the Bar. He wrote with Cardusian authority
on Jayasuriya’s sweep, and Muralitharan’s ‘Gorgia
Pasha’ deliveries.
Warnakulasuriya was often the keeper of the judicial
conscience of the nation, which he demonstrated now and then by
his court appearance-instituted ‘pro dep’ and his wide
ranging writings in The Sunday Times.
When Liyanarachchi, the fundamental rights lawyer,
was killed at the instance of the Police, the Bar Association met
in emergency sessions. At this meeting, Warnakulasuriya moved a
resolution to the effect that no lawyer should appear for the Police
in any Court, and in any case until those policemen responsible
for the Liyanarachchi murder were arrested and charged.
The Warnakulasuriya resolution was carried with
near unanimity, and the Police accused in the Liyanarachchi murder
case had to import legal assistance from London to defend them at
the eventual trial.
Warnakulasuriya made a singular impact as an administrator
in several pivotal bar-related bodies of our country.
As member and Chairman of the Legal Aid Commission
and later the Chairman of the Legal Aid Foundation, for almost a
decade running, Warnakulasuriya organised dispensation of aid to
impoverished litigants, a duty close to his heart’s desire.
As Secretary and Deputy President of the Bar Association,
Warnakulasuriya put in place many innovations for the imparting
of legal education among new entrants to the Bar. To facilitate
this process Warnakulsuriya made the Newsletter, a monthly publication
and the Nithi Neethi Igenuma.
For all this and more, the investiture of silk
and ermine on Warnakulasuriya is not a mere decoration of cosmetic
superficiality, with which such conferment is generally associated
in the perception of the informed public.
This investiture evolved and blended with the
life and times of Warnakulasuriya and constitutes some many splendorous
design embroidered into the tapestry of his career.
I have in my Chambers a bronze replica of the
‘Dance of Siva’ gifted to me by the great Sam Kadiragamar,
QC, in whose Chambers I spent some of the happiest years of my life,
honing the sophistications and refinements of Industrial Law. The
figure has two legs and four hands, one hand carries a flame, the
other, a drum; the third makes a gesture; and the fourth points
to the foot, which is seen trampling a dwarf.
The ‘Dance of Siva’ would appear to
suggest the infinite variety of Warnakulasuriya’s life and
times, holding aloft the flame of practical justice and the drum
depicting fondness for art, craft and culture, trampling the dwarfs
of inequity, and yet maintaining a delicate balance poised on one
foot and promising assistance of material and moral aid with his
suspended arm!
“Do you move, Hemantha Warnakulasuriya?”
The writer is an Attorney-at-Law
|