Performance enhancement …What?
By Vimal Perera
Performance enhancement is a name given to describe;
work towards success. Today's athletes have equipment that has been
specifically designed to improve their performance and enjoyment
of the game. Getting psyched and being mentally confident also contributes
to performance enhancement. This too is serious study and sports
psychologists are sought after. Better physical and strength training
using more scientific methods too helps improve performance. So,
take a look around and enjoy! After all, sport is supposed to be
fun and enjoyment not just winning.
We
often see advertisements with regard to performance enhancement
in every fold but not limited to sport. The environment is one of
performance enhancement whether it is through pills or plastic surgery
to lift a sagging top and bottom line.
It is not surprising that given the environment
people may tend to use short cuts to improve performance. The buzz
in rugby circles as reported in our sister paper the Daily Mirror
on 12th August and in The Sunday Times of 13th August is the suspicion
that drugs are used by some of them involved in rugby. The accusation
is levelled at club as well as school players. No concrete evidence
but deductive reasoning has led to a conclusion. They did not do
well earlier but have uplifted the performance suddenly. Another
argument is that they did well as schoolboys but not when in another
environment. So they must have been taking something. A different
contention is by players themselves who say “we associate
with players and we know.”
Though there is no specific instances reported
it appears that the hierarchy too has heard of these stories. Theirs
is no longer an issue to wait till there is a complaint. The governing
body must show they are cognizant and are organizing themselves
to take action and eradicate the menace and or dispel the doubts
as rumours. Else the game will suffer with parents getting reluctant
to send their children. Doping tests are costly and need specialized
staff. It also needs faculties at the venue. They need publicity
to say that the SLRFU has sent medical officers for training and
this alone will deter any wrong doers.
There is a need to educate coaches and others
in authority on banned substances and the harmful effects. Those
in control must be aware of the perceived knowledge, actual knowledge,
attitude, and intended behaviour of the community of coach’s
mangers and advisors with respect to performance enhancement drugs.
The ‘player’ should not be the only
person to be blamed in case of a positive drug test. Numerous studies
have pointed out that an athlete’s use of drugs in sport could
be attributed to a complex interaction of personal and environmental
factors (Nicholson and Agnew, 1989; Tricker, Cook, and McGuire,
1989). Possible contributing environmental factors include attitudes
of peer group and parents, accessibility to drugs, and cultural
norms and values (Polich, Ellichson, Reuter, and Kahan, 1984; Tricker
and Connolly, 1997).
It is argued that coaches could be one of the
more important agents in preventing drug use among athletes and
should be included in any doping prevention campaigns (Dubin, 1990).
For coaches to function optimally as role models
and in assisting young athletes to formulate correct attitudes against
doping, they must also possess accurate knowledge and appropriate
attitude on doping and drug use.
One possible contributory factor that leads to
performance enhancement drugs being used can be a result of cultural
norms values and high expectation. These come from coaches, club
membership, parents and old boys. The financial aspect of the game
leads persons to think of better performance irrespective of the
means adopted to achieve the end. We hear this often as people claim
so much is spent and we need results. Very often the blame in rugby
falls on the referee when the side does not win. Does this culture
lead to the administration of drugs to stimulate performance? This
question has to be considered if we are to take the reported issues
seriously. It boils down to the values, norms and expectation. While
the issue is about taking drugs and I am talking of values there
is an interesting story doing the rounds? It is about school on
more salubrious climes who it seems have played a student who is
not eligible in terms of the ministry circular as quoted in the
schools handbook. It is alleged the boy had gained admission to
the university in June but had played in July and faded away. If
there is any truth, it is serious business. The irony is, those
who are accused have been making comments about the honesty of others.
Culture being a learned experience may be the others are judged
by what you have gained from your behaviour.
|