Hail the courage and
new paradigm of Capital M
Most
importantly when civil rights of the common man, especially their
right to law, order, and protection are threatened can a channel
to seek redress and highlight such acts as a measure to discourage
others receive greater focus within this new media culture? Supportive
measure for those in governance who are discriminated or reprimanded
merely for doing their duty correctly, professionally and in the
interest of those whom they serve must also be offered.
Civil society must hail the courageous media group
in Sri Lanka that stands for its viewers- the public, especially
the powerless common people.
Their positive people oriented broadcasts, Action
TV, were applauded by many for whom it was the only available medium
of showing their untold suffering, discrimination and most importantly
the social exclusion from the support base of infrastructure and
other services expected from public institutions and those in charge
of governance.
This much needed media action reflecting the action
expectations from those in authority, was the only available demand
of accountability by the excluded powerless millions.
The number of occasions on which these broadcasts
have brought the injustice and suffering to the attention of and
action by those in governance were proof of the effectiveness of
this particular media station.
Even more satisfying were the occasions to view
the smiles on the faces of the excluded and their accolades for
the media station upon their grievances being addressed and relief
sought granted by those in governance.
The action broadcasts of this media group has
been and is a continuing value addition to the civil society, who
must applaud, encourage and support this group.
This media group recently set a new paradigm of
civil society value in strengthening the chain of accountability
by those in governance, when they broadcast the departing words
of a governance chief and questioned the validity of these claims
of good govrnance and high achievements in relation to the poor
record of governance from the same arm of accountability under his
command in the recent past.
This was a new leaf, an act of courage and a much
needed eye opener for those in governance with a thread of hope
for the marginalized and excluded segments in civil society.
Civil society lives in hope of a better tomorrow
in the areas of law, order, security, good governance, fair delivery
of infrastructure and other government services, human and personal
rights, fairness, meritocracy, freedom and transparency and above
all civil liberties.
They certainly applaud the courage and action
and say “Magnificent performance” Capital M and may
you keep up your good work, as we the civil society stand behind
you, the savior of our rights and our path to good governance.
Civil society looks to not only Capital M but
other print, voice and vision media too in a similar hope.
Can the public expect amongst the high level of
“negative news” now covered to see a coverage of “positive
news” featuring the goodness in man- instances where individuals
and those in governance have stretched a hand of support to others
in a selfless manner, a personal achievement which is an example
for society or an instance of overcoming heavy odds facing the individual
in the quest for such achievement, or extending beyond the expectation
of duty or acting in a manner befitting the larger segment of society.
Here too it was pleasing to see Capital M feature
prominently a poor garden labourer who risked his life to save two
children from a burning house. We need more such broadcasts, including
the featuring of the Sinhalese villages of Panama, who are said
to have recently ferried across the Tamil villages of Pothuvil when
threatened by Muslim brothers.
Can issues of transparency, accountability and
good governance demands of the marginalized and the excluded be
given more space? Can also the “facts and figures” of
instances of waste, leakage and damage to public property be featured
and also the alternate questioning voice of professionals, civil
society and religious leaders challenging and placing in a correct
perspective the sermons and factual statements of leaders be aired
and published.
Most importantly when civil rights of the common
man, especially their right to law, order, and protection are threatened
can a channel to seek redress and highlight such acts as a measure
to discourage others receive greater focus within this new media
culture? Supportive measure for those in governance who are discriminated
or reprimanded merely for doing their duty correctly, professionally
and in the interest of those whom they serve must also be offered.
The waves of illicit activity and gangster type
actions of those who challenge the law, and corrupt our social order
with illicit drugs, narcotics and alcohol, or terrorize the innocent,
kidnap and demand ransom and where people suddenly go missing or
are abducted must also be highlighted. The gun culture and trigger
happy persons in power and their goons and ex service persons said
to be available to be deployed for action at the beckoning of a
call and a promise of success fees must be threatened from despite
the high protection they now appear to enjoy.
Well done Capital M; may you continue to set the
new paradigms.
(Comments on this column should be sent to wo_owl@yahoo.co.uk).
|