VAT and the Budget
When President Mahinda Rajapaksa presents his second
budget for 2007 on November 16, questions are still bound to remain
unanswered about the results of the investigations on the VAT scam.
Some suspects are in custody while others are
absconding but little is known about the progress of the probe.
The ongoing investigation has not only slowed down the pace of work
at the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) but also provided all kinds
of excuses for delays in VAT refunds.
As our story on the previous page says cheques
have been signed, recipients given even the cheque number to prove
that the IRD is ready to make the refund. The Commissioner-General
has acknowledged to a chamber delegation that Rs 1.5 billion has
been finalized for repayment but that the Treasury is not releasing
the funds. But separately he says he has received the money from
the Treasury and the refunds would be doled out. Which version should
we believe?
If there is no money, the assumption is that the
Treasury is cash strapped but this cannot be given that according
to the Treasury Secretary revenue collections are more than on target.
Then what is the problem; is it that Dr. P.B. Jayasundera doesn’t
want to release the funds worried that corruption still exists or
is it that he would prefer to release the funds after the investigation
is over?
These are questions not asked by The Sunday Times
FT but by the business community who is paying massive interest
on borrowings to make up for the delays in the refunds. Hayleys
alone has taken an Rs 65 million hit in its profits owing to interest
payment on borrowings because the government owes them Rs 500 million
in refunds.
Big business firms are somehow borrowing and managing.
What about the smaller firms? Ironically Singer Chairman, Hemaka
Amarasuriya says they are still awaiting refunds of the former defence
levy … so much for the efficiency of the IRD or is it a department
in a state of chaos?
Rajapaksa is expected to paint a rosy picture
about the economy (ably guided by Jayasundera) and its progress
despite the war. But figures and the ground situation show a totally
different picture. For example the ‘excellent’ growth
momentum doesn’t show up in the living standards of the average
people.
Prices have skyrocketed. Former Finance Minister
in the 1970s, Dr N.M. Perera’s gazette budgets are very much
a part of our economy now. Most products are raised through gazettes
like the 1000-plus items a few weeks back. This helps the government
not to raise prices through the actual budget other than the usual
taxes on cigarette and alcohol which are also increased outside
the budget.
The budget generally gives direction on policy
and infrastructure is said to be one of the key points in the 2007
policy with the intention of spurring growth and investment.
But questions abound over the government’s
inability to be transparent, accountable and disciplined –
particular in the number of ministries, cabinet positions and spending.
And no one cares. With the UNP-SLFP MoU, more cabinet positions
are in the making adding probably another inevitable first to our
lists of achievements in the world – the largest cabinet in
per capita terms! Spending – not only on defence – is
sharply rising while inaction on the part of the government in tackling
human rights issues, political victimisation like in the case of
two senior government officials in the tea sector both of whom have
been publicly recognized as honest and competent question the state’s
ability to be honest and disciplined.
There would – as usual – be the hurrah
boys from the business community to pay pooja to the budget after
its presentation. On the other hand, issues about law and order,
human rights, high costs of production would still remain issues
unresolved.
|