Asiad --to be or not
to be
By Vimal Perera.
Hong Kong will host the Asian Rugby World Cup
round three qualifying matches that has been rescheduled. These
matches will be played on a round robin basis from the 18th to the
25th of November. The Hong Kong team will be at advantage as they
are on home soil. Is this what HK wanted and if so they have got
it? What has followed the decision to shift the holding of the tournament
as planned in Sri Lanka has put the efforts of the SLRFU to some
sort of disarray.
|
The Peterites celebrate after the newly appointed
Junior National Rugby Coach Sanath Martis guided them to a double
crown in school’s rugby this year. - Pic by Ranjith Perera |
The question that hangs rather precariously on
the heads of the Lankans is that uncertainty “can we host
the postponed ASIAD in January 2007” as envisaged. If the
preparations go on as planned, will the countries come to Sri Lanka
as they were reluctant earlier? Now that the heat of the rugby world
cup is taken away, can the tournament generate the same amount of
interest is another question. The other issue is the possibility
of the sequence of holding one of the oldest tournaments being broken.
Japan and may be Hong Kong will want to come provided the situation
in their opinion improves. This is a big if.
While all the ‘ifs and buts’ are being
debated Sri Lanka is preparing for the sevens tournament at the
Asian Games to be held in December. They are also in preparation
for the Junior Asiad that will be played in Taiwan in December.
While Sri Lanka plans for its future and to a higher slot in the
Asian rugby circuit it is important that they take the junior games
too seriously.
It is very much encouraging to note that the SLRFU
has recognized the achievements in appointing the junior national
coach. Sanath Martis who has been responsible for guiding St Peters
to be undisputed champions in the 2006 season has been selected
as the junior national coach. His deputy will be Viper Gunaratne
jr. who coached St Anthony’s College Kandy to be a leading
rugby playing school this year.
Martis who has been assistant coach to the junior
team twice previously brings with him a wealth of experience that
will be helpful. Viper too will be able to contribute to the training
with his experience as a coach a well as a past national player
who has put in many tears of service.
In molding of the future of the younger rugby
players the coaches have an important role to play as they are the
mentors who the schoolboy players look up to. Given the present
scenario of school boy players having been at the receiving end
of red cards in the recent past the coach will have a major role
in directing its players to play the game in the correct spirit.
It is the coach who can set a better standard to its protégés
by example.
Having coached schools to success without being
accused of unfair play Martis and Gunaratne have a lot to be proud
of and have the responsibility to take those in their charge to
better heights.
News that is the talking point in the international
scene and specifically in England is what is now called “Noon’s
non try”. In the 4th minute of play in Twickenham when England
played New Zealand the television official was called to give advice.
The TMO advised that there was no try. It is now debated that this
decision was wrong. The Guardian newspaper reported on Monday (06th)
that the IRB referee manager was of the view that it was a try and
the confusion a as arose as a result of the wrong question being
asked. The continuous babbling of the commentator the question asked
by the Referee was not clear. The referee then repeats and there
is inaudible as the commentators voice was in between the referee
was from France and the TMO also was from France. The conversation
was in French. The questions translated now point to a situation
of the wrong question being asked, When the question as recommended
should have been “is there any reason why I should not award
a try” .In such a situation --the balance of probability would
be considered and the try awarded. May be it was a case of inexperience
as France uses in goal touch judges and not TV officials.
When mistakes happen at this level and with technology
available it is a something to think about when people rush to condemn
referees back home who have very little support from video replays
and or communication devices. To implement such technology requires
experience and expertise.
|