PM must OK all policy documents
By M. Ismeth
All Ministers have been requested to submit Cabinet papers to the Ministry
of Policy Development and Implementation headed by Prime Minister Ranil
Wickremesinghe for final approval.
The Prime Minister told a group of officials that this decision was
taken to minimise any conflict or contradiction in government policies,
part officials said.
The ministers also have been directed to obtain clearance from the Ministry
of Policy Development and Implementation before they make policy statements.
This is intended to avoid a situation similar to what happened in the
PA government where different ministers made different policy statements.
Meanwhile, government sources explained that the main difference between
cabinet and non-cabinet ministers was that the latter would not regularly
attend the weekly cabinet meetings and could do so by initiating an invitation
to attend the Cabinet.
Prime Minister Wickremesinghe in a special directive had said that cabinet,
non-cabinet ministers and deputy ministers would draw only the salary paid
to MPs.
In this context, the new Mass Communication Minister Imtiaz Bakeer Markar
had denied a claim by former minister Nimal Siripala de Silva that the
difference between a minister's salary and an MP's salary was a mere hundred
rupees.
Mr. Bakeer Markar said the difference was as much as Rs. 7,000.
Two years ago, parliamentarians' salaries were revised and an ordinary
member's salary was increased from Rs. 13,250 to Rs. 22,100, a deputy minister's
from Rs. 16,500 to Rs. 28,750 and a Cabinet minister's from Rs. 19,500
to Rs. 29,815.
All ministers would however be given MSD security but a few key ministers
handling crucial portfolios would be given special STF security, UNP sources
said.
Defence Minister Tilak Marapana, Interior Minister John Amaratunga,
Enterprise Development and Constitutional Affairs Minister G. L. Peiris
and Labour Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe would have additional security,
its strength varying from six to ten personnel, they said.
Post election violence:
United National Front government under fire
By Chris Kamalendran
Election related incidents of violence reached their climax on the polling
day with PA members and supporters becoming the majority of victims, political
sources said.
They said the police had failed to act promptly in some instances.
Police said they had recorded over 400 complaints during the three days
following elections from various parts of the country amidst indications
that post poll violence was still continuing at a lower scale.
Former Media Minister Mangala Samaraweera told journalists the state
media were not giving adequate publicity to the incidents of violence.
"We have reached a stage that the state media are even refusing to publish
paid obituaries of our party supporters," Mr. Samaraweera said.
He said thousands of party supporters had taken refuge in the houses
of PA parliamentarians in certain areas as their dwellings were being attacked
and police failing to provide protection.
"In some of the areas the police are even refusing to entertain our
complaints," he said. Before polls the majority of the complaints were
against the PA for attacks on UNP supporters but after the elections the
trend had turned the other way with the bulk of the complaints coming in
from the PA claiming that their supporters were being attacked by UNPers.
The highest number of election-related incidents of violence was recorded
from Anuradhapura, Puttalam, Chilaw, Matale, Kuliyapitiya, Kurunegala,
Kegalle, Negombo, Nawalapitiya, Gampola, Laggala, Hanguranketha, Rambukkana,
Ingiriya, Hatharaliyadda, Gampaha and Galle, PA sources said.
At least five deaths had been reported from Nochchiyagama, Beliatta,
Madampe and Vavuniya, they said. Two TELO supporters were among those killed
in Vavuniya.
In most incidents the violence had been created by UNP supporters in
the area and in some instances UNP's elected members or the defeated candidates
had been unable to control the tide of violence.
The PA has charged that in some of the areas the UNP's elected members
themselves were involved in the attacks on their opponents while in other
areas the defeated candidates and the area organisers had been responsible
for the attacks. The UNP has strongly rejected the claim.
In most cases the incidents were spontaneous where groups had organised
themselves and carried out attacks on houses, business establishments and
vehicles. Some of the cases were reported from remote villages where the
police or the Army mobile patrols would take time to move in. However,
in some of the areas police were taking more time than necessary to move
in as the officer in charge himself was identified with a PA politician
or a minister in the area.
Police statistics reveals in addition to the deaths at least 95 cases
of arson had been reported in eight days after the elections. Over 30 incidents
of assault, nine cases of attempted killings and three cases of causing
serious injuries had also been reported.
The PA had made over 250 complaints while the UNP had lodged over 68
until Thursday. The PA claimed more complaints were to be made and in certain
areas they were not entertained by the police.The party also gave more
details about certain incidents. PA sources said in the Nawalapitiya area
more than 30 incidents of setting fire to shops and houses had been reported.
They said some houses had been attacked and damaged. In the Laggala area
at least 15 incidents of arson and attacks on houses and shops had been
reported. In the Deraniyagala area 25 shops and 15 houses were burnt, sources
said.
In Bingiriya in the Kurunegala district ten houses had been burnt down
or damaged, political sources said.
Meanwhile, sporadic incidents of causing damage to vehicles belonging
to PA supporters had been reported.
Election desk chief DIG Gamini Navaratna told The Sunday Times in most
of the places the police were stationed only until the elections were over.
He said the Army had replaced the police at certain check points before
the elections and the police were compelled to relieve them after the elections.
"The normal strength of a police station is insufficient to patrol the
whole area as they have to attend to other duties as well," he said.
DIG Navaratna has appealed to politicians returning to their areas over
the weekend not to hold processions to avoid clashes. Meanwhile, Interior
Affairs Minister John Amaratunga told The Sunday Times he had given instructions
to the Police Chief to take tough action against any person involved in
acts of election related violence.
PA trade unionists under attack, says Moulana
Former Minister and SLFP trade union leader Alavi Moulana yesterday appealed
to UNP trade Union activists not to harass or intimidate SLFP trade unionists
at their work places.
Mr. Moulana told The Sunday Times that he had received several complaints
that PA trade unionists were harassed by UNPers at state institutions.
He said these incidents were taking place despite appeals made by the
Minister and UNP trade union wing leader Gamini Atukorale calling UNP members
not to harass opposition supporters.
He said a trade union meeting would be held tomorrow to discuss the
situation.
AG amicus in Batty's case
By Laila Nasry
The Court of Appeal on Friday requested the Attorney General's assistance
in the writ application filed by former Justice Minister Batty Weerakoon
challenging the People's Alliance national list.
The matter came up for support before Justice Gamini Amaratunga who
asked Deputy Solicitor General A. Gnanathasan to be amicus curiae.
Mr. Gnanathasan informed court he had not received notice though the
Attorney General had been made a party to the matter.
He further said the handing over of the national list by PA general
secretary D. M. Jayaratne was a ministerial act and did not come under
the purview of writ jurisdiction as no decision or determination had been
made by the Election Commissioner. Mr. Gnanathasan citing the Gamini Atukorale
V. The Commissioner of Elections judgment in support of his position.
The Elections Commissioner, PA general secretary D. M. Jayaratne and
the national list nominees have been cited as the respondents.
Court asked Mr. Weerakoon's counsel to take into consideration the above
judgment.
The case was put off for January 15, 2002.
Mr. Weerakoon went before the Court of Appeal stating that the decision
taken by the PA executive committee to include at least one member from
each constituent party had not been complied with as there was no LSSP
nominee on the national list submitted by the party.
Mr.Weerakoon prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the decision of
the Elections Commissioner from accepting the PA national list and a writ
of mandamus on him to issue notice afresh calling on the PA general secretary
to submit a new list in accordance with the PA constitution.
PA defeat, its price of arrogance: BattyBy Chandani
Kirinde
Former Justice Minister and LSSP general secretary Batty Weerakoon who
was dropped from the national list said the PA's inability to cut down
the cost of the war caused its downfall.
"I think everybody concerned has a bitter lesson to learn. It is the
price of arrogance and the non-transparency in the conduct of its affairs,"
Mr. Weerakoon told The Sunday Times in an interview.
"We heaped abuse on ministers for some of their lapses but they continued
to be with us during the past six to seven years. Finally they themselves
decided to go," he said.
The veteran leftist politician who served as a national list MP since
1994 in the PA government received a rude shock when he was dropped from
the PA's national list along with SLFP stalwart Alavi Moulana.
Mr.Weerakoon said his exclusion was not a personal matter but a political
issue. He said the selection process was unacceptable as it did not adhere
to the PA constitution.
"They made the selection without any consultation. They removed people
like myself and put in a playboy, an SLFP southern provincial councillor
who, since his election to the council, had not gone there or functioned
for a single day," Mr.Weerakoon charged.
He said he had heard of his name being left out from the list sent to
the Elections Commissioner from journalists. When he asked the PA general
secretary D. M. Jayaratne to clarify the situation, he had been told the
"orders had come from above."
Meanwhile, Mr. Weerakoon has challenged the PA national list in a case
filed before the Court of Appeal.
He said there would not be much for him to do in parliament in the present
situation when the SLFP itself was undecided whether it should cohabit
with the UNF government.
Former Justice Minister claimed he did not see any difference between
the UNP and the UNF. He said in the present confused situation he would
be a lone voice. He also said he would object to the formation of a national
government.
Mr. Weerakoon said the SLFP right wing had been dominating for sometime
and his presence in the Cabinet had prevented the PA government from adopting
certain measures promoted by foreign investors and their local agents.
He cited the attempts to sell the Eppawala phosphate deposits, privatise
the state banks and education were meant to please foreign investors.
He said if not for his presence in the Cabinet many of such measures
might have been passed.
Mr. Weerakoon expressed fears that such measures might see the light
of day under an administration friendly towards foreign investors. He said
the present SLFP leadership was not capable of directing the progressive
forces in the PA.
Answering a question Mr. Weerakoon said the LSSP was still represented
in parliament by Ven. Baddegama Samitha Thera.
He said the SLFP had objected to the Thera's nomination. Mr. Weerakoon
said his party would remain in the PA even though he was dropped from the
national list. |