Demands
by the auditors
Audit
officers protesting the acid attack on their colleague. (file
photo)
|
Events
following the acid attack on Central Province's Chief Auditor,
Lalith Ambanwela one month back have been proceeding as expected,
with some arrests but amidst growing public dissatisfaction both
at the slowness of the investigations and with the manner in which
wider issues with regard to the overall functions of the Auditor
General are being left untouched. Continuing protests by auditors
island wide have buoyed public demands for an effective investigation
into the attack which has left Mr Ambanwela critically ill in hospital
and sapped the confidence of his colleagues in the performance of
their public duties.
Thursday's letter
by President Chandrika Kumaratunga to Inspector General of Police,
Lucky Kodithuwakku emphasises this point, with President Kumaratunga
requesting that the investigations be expedited and stating that
"she is not satisfied that the police has taken adequate steps
to bring the culprits and high officials who are supposed to have
aided them, to justice."
Mr Ambanwela
had been investigating particular frauds in the Provincial Education
Ministry during the regime of the previous government, which amounted
to nearly 40 million rupees in total, including defective purchases
and bribes paid to ministry officials. These were irregularities
bypassing the internal auditor of the ministry which were being
extensively inquired into by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC)
and in regard to which the Chief Education Secretary and the Provincial
Education Director of the Central Province had been noticed to appear
before the PAC. Mr Ambanwela had also been investigating the question
of abuse of state vehicles during the December elections which lends
a certain ring of poetic justice to the letter that President Kumaratunga
has seen fit to forward to the IGP this week.
Soon after
the attack on Mr Ambanwela, this column commented on its wider implications
as far as issues of public accountability and processes of governance
are concerned in this country, particularly pointing to significant
failings in the law as it presently relates to the functions of
the Auditor General as well as to the disparity between the theoretical
constitutional protection afforded to the office and the reality.
Officers of the Auditor General's Department, who wished to remain
unidentified, have meanwhile made further representations, elaborating
on these failings in a manner that deserves specific mention.
Chief on this
list comes the need to amend the law in order that the public are
able to claim the right to investigate the manner in which public
funds are being utilised, which was indeed, the primary reason why
the Central Province's chief auditor is presently in intensive care
in hospital. The law, as it presently stands, does not specifically
allow an individual to petition the Auditor General directly regarding
financial malpractices in state institutions. Neither is there provision
for a member of the public to obtain audit reports regarding the
same. If, for example, there had, indeed, been provision regarding
the same and given the magnitude of the fraud which had taken place
in the Central Province Education Ministry, the involvement of public
spirited individuals as well as civil society organisations might
well have been far greater, thus shifting the focus away from Mr
Ambanwela as one singularly isolated crusader. While it should be
noted in this connection that the proposed Freedom of Information
Act would greatly improve the present situation as far as access
to financial information is concerned, this would be one more reason
why this proposed law should be passed into statute as quickly as
possible. The prompt publication of audit reports in order to ensure
more effective public involvement into the nature and scope of financial
accountability in public institutions is also identified as a priority.
Auditors have
meanwhile represented specific demands that relate to the streamlining
of the Department of the Auditor General and the strengthening of
its powers. Underlining these demands is the need to codify the
numerous regulations and laws that relate and regulate the power
and functions of the Auditor General into one Act. Additionally,
it is pointed out that the Auditor General should be given specific
authority to ensure that disobedience by any public officer to any
of its directions be visited with specific punishment as provided
for by law. This should be aggravated in the case of public officers
who fail to attend audit inquiries or refuse to divulge necessary
information to the auditors.
Prevalent regulations
provide that all chief accounting officers and accounting officers
should ensure that every assistance is given to audit officers and
see that audit queries are not only properly investigated but also
that defects are promptly corrected. Where an audit officer raises
audit queries, it is provided that at least an interim report should
be prepared if a final reply is not immediately forthcoming. An
officer meanwhile is made personally responsible for any loss caused
to the government by his or her own delay, negligence, fault or
fraud and is requited therefore to make good that loss. It is also
provided that the internal audit units should operate independently
of the ministries and departments. Here again, one sees the need
to streamline the functioning of the internal audit units as demonstrated
in the Central Province Education Ministry where manifest irregularities
which Mr Ambanwela had been investigating, had apparently bypassed
the internal auditor. It is imperative therefore that the law provides
for formal inquiry and swift disciplinary action against errant
internal auditors of this nature.
These changes
demanded to the law relating to the powers and functions of the
Department of the Auditor General in Sri Lanka cannot obviously
be accomplished by a mere apprehension and punishment of the perpetrators
of the acid attack on Mr. Ambanwela, important as the latter is
for the purposes of deterrence. What is needed is a thorough structural
overhaul of the regulatory framework in reference to the office
of the Auditor General. This too, should manifestly be a priority
for the future.
|