Will LTTE follow
IRA?
The
Irish Republican Army apology over the week for 30 years of sectarian
violence in which hundreds of civilians were killed was by and large
welcomed by the British press. The British Daily Mirror said in its
front page "Sorry? You bloody well should be,'' adding in its
Editorial however that the Catholic paramilitary group's apology "is
the most hopeful sign yet that an organization committed to killing
has accepted that its war is at an end.'' Though some newspapers said
the apology was not made in good faith, it was acknowledged almost
across the board, that the apology signifies the IRA's readiness for
consolidating the peace initiative. The IRA statement which contained
the apology for its part stated that the organization is "totally
committed to the peace process in Northern Ireland.''
No similar
apology was forthcoming from the LTTE leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran
when he was asked in Kilinochchi about civilian killings in his
campaign for separatism in Sri Lanka. Even so, Prabhakaran and his
lieutenants both of the political and military variety swear by
peace these days.
LTTE violence
has certainly claimed more than the 650 civilian lives lost in the
IRA's 30 year armed campaign. But, the LTTE's apparent fondness
for peace and the process of establishing a permanent peace seems
to be even more loudly articulated these days than the IRA's pacifism.
Thamilchelvan, perhaps the LTTE's most quoted and articulate man
since the ceasefire pact was signed, has said that "the LTTE
is civilized enough to know that there can be no return to war again.''
At least one way in which the LTTE can prove that sincerity is to
issue an apology for civilian killings in Aranathalawa, Sri Mahabodhiya,
Central Bank, Maradana and many other locations far too numerous
to mention here. But then, is the LTTE half as contrite or as sincere
as the IRA in these matters?
Chapter
closed?
The
LTTE's most high handed act since the ceasefire began, the abduction
of Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission members in an incident close to
Iranathivu has now passed. The LTTE has issued an apology. The Norwegians
and the international community seem to be satisfied.
It is easier
to accept an apology when a stake one has in an issue is strictly
limited.. If the LTTE says "sorry chum'' the Norwegians can
take that apology, retire to the Hilton Pub, and say "all is
well that ends well for us ceasefire monitors.''
But, not so
fast for us Sri Lankans who have much more of a stake in the ceasefire
and its ramifications. It is near absurd that the whole kidnap drama
has in fact served as a smokescreen of sorts for the larger issue
which is of import in the whole Iranathivu episode.
What exactly
were the LTTE boats, masquerading as Indian fisher-boats, trying
to unload?There are no answers for these questions either by the
LTTE or by the Norwegians. All the Norwegians seem to be able to
say is that they were very hurt and that the peace process is being
compromised. It is not difficult to empathize with that. But when
the cesefire monitors get kidnapped, do they usually forget what
it is they were supposed to be monitoring in the first place? Who
is talking about what kinds of weapons the LTTE were transporting
and why? But can any of these questions be answered, when the ceasefire
monitors seem to be more interested in attending to their own wounds
both physical and psychological, inflicted as a result of a horrendous
high sea abduction?
|