How
many people? Must count them again
The fact is that we do not know how many people inhabit our
little Island. The mid-year population was estimated at 19.4 million.
Then the Census of 2001 came up with the figure of 18.7million, 700,000
less than the estimated figure. If we are certain that the Census
figure is correct, then we can make the correction and accept the
implications of the difference.
Unfortunately
the Census figure itself is a partial enumeration supplemented with
an estimate and not a full count of the population. Therein lies
the predicament as to what our real population count is. The year-to-year
population is obtained by adding the number of registered births
each year, deducting the number of registered deaths and adjusting
for the migration figures. This has been a satisfactory way of obtaining
the country's population figure for the inter-censal years. This
is especially so as in the past the records of registrations of
births and deaths have been good and the figure obtained did not
vary much with the population count. The current position is very
different.
The Census
of Population was conducted after 20 years, deviating from the usual
practice of having a Census every ten years. Then the last Census
could not be carried out in three districts and in four others it
was only partial. Therefore the Census figure itself has an element
of estimation.
For this reason
it is difficult to accept this figure. On the other hand, the estimated
mid year population figure could be very defective as the 20 year
intervening period between the Censuses witnessed upheavals that
had a bearing on the registrations of deaths and the migration figures.
These included the JVP insurgency that led to perhaps thousands
of youth being killed and burned to death, an unprecedented out
migration of people through various channels that had not been counted
and the deaths of thousands of others in the civil war and those
"missing in action". All these have a bearing on the current
population figures.
For the reasons
mentioned, it is likely that the mid-year population of 19.4 million
for 2001 was perhaps an overestimate. On the other hand, it is difficult
to reconcile that there has been an unregistered loss of as much
as 700,000 persons in the intervening period. A figure of around
400,000 is more likely. In which case the 2001 population would
be about 19 million, rather than the estimated 19.4 million or the
Census estimate of 18.7 million.
What this discussion
implies is the need to do a proper count perhaps another intervening
Census in 2006, when hopefully conditions in the country would enable
a proper enumeration of the population. This is particularly important,
as it is not only the total population figure that is needed but
also the district-wise and provincial figures. It is also important
to ensure that the next Census is free from biases and non-counting
in areas of the country.
Let us turn
to some of the implications of a revised figure of the population.
Even without considering a revision of past figures of many economic
variables that would pose considerable difficulties and revision
of many assessments on the economy, even the current figures and
future estimates have important implications. First of what the
entire Census figures imply is that the population growth rate has
been smaller than estimated. Second, the future projections of populations
are now in disarray. New projections of population are needed, yet
this cannot commence till the base figures are better. Third the
age profile of the population is likely to be different.
Fourth, the
Census also disclosed the sex ratios to be very different with women
out numbering the men by a more significant amount. This has important
implications for population growth.
An important
change would be in the calculation of per capita income. The Central
Bank has already adjusted the GDP per capita figures for the past
few years. For instance the per capita income for 2000 has been
revised from US dollars 856 to 899. The per capita income for 2001
of US$ 837 was on the basis of Census population figure of 18.7
million.
This statistical
increase in per capita income would itself have certain implications
about the terms on which we obtain international assistance. Some
of the concessional finance may not be available to us.
The overall
implications of this discussion is the need to arrive at an acceptable
estimate of the current population on rational and scientific lines,
the need to revise certain important economic figures without distorting
past assessments and most importantly, the need to conduct another
Census in a few years time so that the country has a proper estimate
of the total population, its composition and distribution.
|