Cohabit
or co-perish
The President unequivocally accused
the Prime Minister of sharing in kickbacks for school admissions when
he was Minister of Education 15 years ago, and then she denied having
said what she said. In other words, the President is admitting that
she does not know what she is saying at public meetings.
The President
has also indicated at times at least that she not only doesn't know
what she is saying, but also does not know what she is doing, such
as when she granted a three-year extension to the Commander of the
Navy. It was an act that demoralized the Naval forces and split
the Navy high-command right down the middle.
The government
is in the meanwhile provoking the President who resembles a wounded
hog on the rampage. The latest of these moves is to solicit her
support to enact laws that will effectively strip her of powers
to preside over the armed forces, through its new command structure
which is the Joint Chief of Staffs Committee.
It may not
be a bad idea to take these powers away from her - for during her
tenure of office she abdicated those powers to her Deputy Minister
who was put in charge of prosecuting the war against the guerrillas
up north. When army camps fell like ninepins the President did not
even see it fit to return from her foreign sojourns.
But there is
a sticky issue that arises now, which is whether the government
is trying to bypass the President to control the military apparatus,
in order to make passage for its peace deal with the guerrillas,
smoother.
The government's
handling of the military apparatus during the tenure of the current
MoU with the LTTE is far from exemplary. At every turn, there was
a capitulation to the designs of the rebels, a series of events
which has now climaxed with seven soldiers being abducted flagrantly
in violation of the MoU, and coinciding with the much ballyhooed
release of prisoners-of-war last week.
These are what
are colloquially referred to as incidents which reveal 'coming colours';
why is the government bending over backwards to accommodate the
LTTE in relation to each and every bizarre and brazen incident?
Despite the
popular sentiment countrywide that the Presidency is not suitable
for our country as it concentrates too much power on one individual
who often acts as a dictator, the UNF does not want the Presidency
dismantled either, for reasons of its own. The PA wants the Presidency
because their leader is incumbent.
If that is
the case, at least let cohabitation then work, and let there be
some super structure mechanism that is created that allows for good
governance.
This mechanism
must be at the highest political level. It need not be a move to
sideline cabinet government but be very much like the regular joint
committee that was set up on Friday to monitor the peace process.
There is not much fun in having bipartisanship on the peace process
if domestic issues are to be thrown to the wolves and subjected
to the vagaries of party politics and personality clashes.
The people
- labouring under the strains of rising bills to settle at home
- are sick and tired of parochial issues that range from the import
of a handbag to fictitious claims of bribe taking for school entries.
National issues
like education, defence and security, investment and tourism, environment,
etc. need bipartisanship at the highest levels at least for as long
as this country must live with the fate of cohabitation.
|