Kotmale
cross-currents
By The
Sunday Times News Desk
Promises
don't hold water, says Prelate
Sri Lanka's top Buddhist prelate has warned that the
Kotmale hydropower project could endanger the lives of thousands
of people and destroy time-honoured scenic treasures like
waterfalls.
The
Ven. Rambukwelle Sri Vipassi Mahanayake Thera of the Malwatte
Chapter who joined CWC leader on a Thalawakele stage last
Sunday to protest against Kotmale, said he had little faith
in promises and assurances given by the authorities.
The prelate
said he remembered the promises and boast made about Victoria
and other Mahaweli projects. The authorities had boasted that
Sri Lanka would be able to supply electricity to India but
everyone knows how Sri Lanka was plunged into its worst darkness
last year.
The Mahanayake
said better life and more benefits had been promised to those
who were displaced by Victoria and other projects but the
people had been driven into poverty and distress.
Key
events
o1985 -1987 - Feasibility report on Upper Kotmale Hydro-power
Project done
oMarch 1992 the Sri Lankan Government and the Japanese Government
agreed on the UKHP
oA loan
of Japanese Yen 1,482 million (approximately Rs. 1141.14 million)
was granted by the Japanese, to comply with the initial design,
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and to submit the Final
Report by 1995. The loan was fully consumed by May 1997.
oFebruary
1995 - Central Environmental Authority (CEA) rejects the EIA.
oMarch
1996 - The CEB decided to carry out an EIA to ensure that
the UKHP is the least hazardous to the environment. Accordingly,
additional information to the EIA Report (EIAR) was submitted
by the CEB and was referred to the CEA in July 1996.
oDecember
1996 - The CEA rejected the additional information to the
EIAR.
oApril
1997 - CEB appeals to the Secretary - Ministry of Forestry
and Environment (MF&E) for approval of the UKHP.
oJune
1998 - Secretary - MF&E approves the project.
oOctober
1998 - Environmental Foundation Limited (EFL) files a case
against the Secretary's decision.
oJuly
1999 - Case between the Secretary and EFL settled on agreement
to give a fair hearing to opposing parties.
oMarch
2000 - Final approval given by the Secretary, MF&E after
reviewing all submissions for and against by CEA and EFL and
conducting several hearings.
oMay 2002
- Ceylon Workers Congress (CWC) sends communiqué on
UKHP.
oJune
2002 - Ministry of Power and Energy and CEB replies CWC communiqué.
oJune
2002 - Prime Minister appoints Inter Ministerial Committee
to report on UKHP.
oJuly 2002 - Inter Ministerial Committee report submitted,
but CWC rejects proposals.
oSept
2002 - Cabinet grants approval for the project.
CEB
switches on the positives
The CEB has given assurances regarding concerns and possible
dangers from the Kotmale project. A CEB report states: Water
will be released everyday to maintain the continuous flow
from the
Devon
Falls, St. Clairs Falls, Puna Oya Falls, Ramboda Falls, and
Dunsinane Falls. In Puna Oya only the right branch of the
waterfall is to be tapped. The visual beauty of the fall will
not be affected. The CEB is to release water to meet the basic
needs during periods of drought.
The CEB
will, during the entire project period, accumulate a complete
standardised photographic record of all the waterfalls so
that the visual appearance of the individual falls can be
continually assessed objectively against flow and weather
regimes.
Watershed
management
The Watershed
management plan will be further developed with special attention
on aforestation with a variety of indigenous species in consultation
with the Environmental Monitoring Committee.
Biodiversity
A fresh
assessment of the biodiversity in the impact zone will be
commissioned.
Water-table
A water-table
monitoring programme in the project impact zone will be developed
in consultation with the Environmental Monitoring Committee
and implemented as early as possible.
Landslide
mitigation
Taking
into consideration activities such as reservoir impounding,
quarrying, road widening, resettlement and rock blasting which
could precipitate landslides, the CEB will, in consultation
with the Environmental Monitoring Committee adopt all safeguards
consistent with best engineering practises to minimize the
risk of landslides in the impact zones.
Excavated
materials
Excavated
materials such as tunnel muck will be used in construction
, landfill, slope stabilisation and road works associated
with the project with adequate safeguards being taken against
erosion and the washing of this material into waterways.
Social responsibility
The Talawakelle
pond could be used for recreational tourism and inland fisheries
with relevant local-government regulations.
In addition
to the modern housing scheme being constructed, a new rest
house, town hall, cinema and garbage collection and disposal
systems will be built.
Unskilled
jobs for the project will be given to the local community
and the CEB will also launch a skills enhancement programme.
|
The Kotmale Hydro Power Project caught
up in the whirlwind of politics is again onhold despite efforts
by the Ministry of Power and Energy to push through the project
on the basis that the country is still facing a power crisis.
Cabinet approval
has been given for the project. But many environmental concerns
raised by critiques have not been addressed leaving room for the
Ceylon Workers Congress (CWC) to portray the project as an environmental
nightmare.
The CWC
in a counter report submitted to the Ministry of Power and Energy
has claimed that the CEB's mitigatory measures do not go to the
roots of the possible environmental dangers to water falls and other
natural settings.
The CWC report
known to have been prepared by environmental experts throws cold
water on the proposed project which is intended to generate 150
Mw (531 Gwh) to the National Grid in about five years.
The CWC
report says at least 430 families would be seriously affected while
the alternative sights and socio-economic packages offered to them
are unacceptable.
It says seven
beautiful waterfalls will be endangered while the impact on thedownstream
water uses has apparently not been considered. Besides these problems
the CWC is also angry that the project is being pushed through in
its strongholds of Talawakele and surrounding areas without proper
consultations or the consent of the party.
So the party
organised a massive show of strength last Sunday with the mainattraction
being the country's top Buddhist prelate, the Malwatte Mahanayake,
who joined the protest campaign (See separate story for his comments).
The CWC is
expressing concern that the Environmental Ministry also had approvedthe
project though serious concerns had been raised by independent environmental
and the scientific groups when the EIA was being done.
It said the
Central Environmental Authority had recommended that alternative
projectsbe looked into but it was ignored.
The CWC said
one optional project was rejected on the basis of the presence ofCrystalline
Limestone band and associated landslides. But those matters had
not been considered in the geological evaluation report on Upper
Kotmale. It warned that water leaks and other dangers that erupted
in the Samanalawewa project might recur in Kotmale. But the official
report had ignored or purposely overlooked these.
"The EIA
assumption that there is no water usage downstream of St. Clair-one
of the water falls which would be affected cannot be accepted and
no quantitativeassessment has been done in support of the argument,"
the CWC report said.
The fears that
Kotmale Oya will run dry particularly during the dry season, theclimatic
changes which could affect tea plantations and vegetable cultivation
thus affecting the country's economy and the impact on fauna and
flora are among the other concerns in the report.
It says the
issue whether the surrounding mountains could bear the pressure
of thewater was another concern which has gone unanswered in the
reports by the engineers.
The CWC which
has vowed to continue its battle against the proposed project saysthat
the CEB assertion that there is no environmental impact is not supported
by new technical evidence.
The issue has
turned into a political battle, after Power and Energy Minister,
Karu Jayasuriya's son in law, Naveen Dissanayake-Deputy Plantations
Minister entered the fray by calling on Mr. Thondaman to resign
from the cabinet if he was going against the cabinet decision on
the project.
Mr. Dissanayake
son of former UNP frontliner and plantation king maker Gamini Diassanayake
warned that another major power crisis might hit the country if
Kotmale project was dropped.
When the dispute
over Kotmale first emerged earlier this year Prime Minister Ranil
Wickremesinghe appointed an experts committee which recommended
that the go ahead be given for the project with effective safeguards
to prevent environmental damage.(See separate story on CEB assurances).
The Sunday
Times learns that Japan which was to bankroll the Kotmale project
is also concerned about the disputes and delays.
One report
said the Japanese Embassy had warned that funds might be withdrawn
if the government did not take a decision to go ahead with the project.
But an embassy official on Friday declined to confirm or deny this
report.
Dangerous
power games with nature
Several
independent environmental groups have warned of serious dangers
in the proposed Kotmale project.
Green party
leader Piyal Parakrama said the CEA had twice rejected the project
and he wondered how it had now approved it without obtaining new
data from experts.
He said the
project's main areas Talawakele and Niyangangdora were known to
be prone to landslides and had a high soil erosion rate while and
could be a danger.
Environmental
Education Society leader Jagath Gunawardena, a widely respected
environmentalist also expressed deep concern for the well being
of indigenous creatures and plants of the area.
He said their
existance depended upon an environment created by the surrounding
waterfalls termed the 'Spray Zone'. He warned that although there
have been promises to let out water for 10 minutes every hour, the
animals and reptiles may not be able to hold up for 50 minutes of
dryness and would surely perish.
Mr. Gunawardena
also referred to another important aspect 'flash floods'-caused
by, heavy rainfall that would force the flood gates to be opened
suddenly, with little or no warning.
"This
would invariably result in the washing away of uninformed people
and animals, who obviously don't heed signs. Likewise the 'drying
up' of the water falls and rivers around would also be a serious
threat to the environment," he said.
Mr. Gunawardena
said the safety of the environment must be closely connected to
an efficient electricity supply.
Mr. Gunawardena
said he believed there was a need to diversify the electricity generating
options. Instead of substituting hydro power with something like
coal, which would depend on importing resources and adding to our
heavy debt rate, he suggested using the country's resources like
solar or wind power and being independent. He said that although
installation costs of these substitute energies were high, on the
long run, they would be much more cost effective and practical.
However, he
pointed out that since the Emergency Power Supply Bill was passed
last year, nothing could be done now on a legal basis.
Hemantha Vithange,
Executive Director of the Environmental Foundation said he had questions
on the economic feasibility of the project. "It will be carried
out on a 1:1 cost benefit ratio thus, if the plant is unable to
generate the total capacity needed to cover the costs, then the
project would be running at a net loss," he said.
Mr. Vithanage
said no response had been given to his query regarding the release
of water from the water falls. "We have suggested an emergency
gate, for water to be let out to the falls if necessary. But it
has not been provided for," he complained.
|