News

 

Kotmale cross-currents

By The Sunday Times News Desk

Promises don't hold water, says Prelate
Sri Lanka's top Buddhist prelate has warned that the Kotmale hydropower project could endanger the lives of thousands of people and destroy time-honoured scenic treasures like waterfalls.

The Ven. Rambukwelle Sri Vipassi Mahanayake Thera of the Malwatte Chapter who joined CWC leader on a Thalawakele stage last Sunday to protest against Kotmale, said he had little faith in promises and assurances given by the authorities.

The prelate said he remembered the promises and boast made about Victoria and other Mahaweli projects. The authorities had boasted that Sri Lanka would be able to supply electricity to India but everyone knows how Sri Lanka was plunged into its worst darkness last year.

The Mahanayake said better life and more benefits had been promised to those who were displaced by Victoria and other projects but the people had been driven into poverty and distress.

Key events
o1985 -1987 - Feasibility report on Upper Kotmale Hydro-power Project done
oMarch 1992 the Sri Lankan Government and the Japanese Government agreed on the UKHP

oA loan of Japanese Yen 1,482 million (approximately Rs. 1141.14 million) was granted by the Japanese, to comply with the initial design, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and to submit the Final Report by 1995. The loan was fully consumed by May 1997.

oFebruary 1995 - Central Environmental Authority (CEA) rejects the EIA.

oMarch 1996 - The CEB decided to carry out an EIA to ensure that the UKHP is the least hazardous to the environment. Accordingly, additional information to the EIA Report (EIAR) was submitted by the CEB and was referred to the CEA in July 1996.

oDecember 1996 - The CEA rejected the additional information to the EIAR.

oApril 1997 - CEB appeals to the Secretary - Ministry of Forestry and Environment (MF&E) for approval of the UKHP.

oJune 1998 - Secretary - MF&E approves the project.

oOctober 1998 - Environmental Foundation Limited (EFL) files a case against the Secretary's decision.

oJuly 1999 - Case between the Secretary and EFL settled on agreement to give a fair hearing to opposing parties.

oMarch 2000 - Final approval given by the Secretary, MF&E after reviewing all submissions for and against by CEA and EFL and conducting several hearings.

oMay 2002 - Ceylon Workers Congress (CWC) sends communiqué on UKHP.

oJune 2002 - Ministry of Power and Energy and CEB replies CWC communiqué.

oJune 2002 - Prime Minister appoints Inter Ministerial Committee to report on UKHP.
oJuly 2002 - Inter Ministerial Committee report submitted, but CWC rejects proposals.

oSept 2002 - Cabinet grants approval for the project.

CEB switches on the positives
The CEB has given assurances regarding concerns and possible dangers from the Kotmale project. A CEB report states: Water will be released everyday to maintain the continuous flow from the

Devon Falls, St. Clairs Falls, Puna Oya Falls, Ramboda Falls, and Dunsinane Falls. In Puna Oya only the right branch of the waterfall is to be tapped. The visual beauty of the fall will not be affected. The CEB is to release water to meet the basic needs during periods of drought.

The CEB will, during the entire project period, accumulate a complete standardised photographic record of all the waterfalls so that the visual appearance of the individual falls can be continually assessed objectively against flow and weather regimes.

Watershed management

The Watershed management plan will be further developed with special attention on aforestation with a variety of indigenous species in consultation with the Environmental Monitoring Committee.

Biodiversity

A fresh assessment of the biodiversity in the impact zone will be commissioned.
Water-table

A water-table monitoring programme in the project impact zone will be developed in consultation with the Environmental Monitoring Committee and implemented as early as possible.

Landslide mitigation

Taking into consideration activities such as reservoir impounding, quarrying, road widening, resettlement and rock blasting which could precipitate landslides, the CEB will, in consultation with the Environmental Monitoring Committee adopt all safeguards consistent with best engineering practises to minimize the risk of landslides in the impact zones.

Excavated materials

Excavated materials such as tunnel muck will be used in construction , landfill, slope stabilisation and road works associated with the project with adequate safeguards being taken against erosion and the washing of this material into waterways.
Social responsibility

The Talawakelle pond could be used for recreational tourism and inland fisheries with relevant local-government regulations.

In addition to the modern housing scheme being constructed, a new rest house, town hall, cinema and garbage collection and disposal systems will be built.

Unskilled jobs for the project will be given to the local community and the CEB will also launch a skills enhancement programme.

The Kotmale Hydro Power Project caught
up in the whirlwind of politics is again onhold despite efforts by the Ministry of Power and Energy to push through the project on the basis that the country is still facing a power crisis.

Cabinet approval has been given for the project. But many environmental concerns raised by critiques have not been addressed leaving room for the Ceylon Workers Congress (CWC) to portray the project as an environmental nightmare.
The CWC in a counter report submitted to the Ministry of Power and Energy has claimed that the CEB's mitigatory measures do not go to the roots of the possible environmental dangers to water falls and other natural settings.

The CWC report known to have been prepared by environmental experts throws cold water on the proposed project which is intended to generate 150 Mw (531 Gwh) to the National Grid in about five years.
The CWC report says at least 430 families would be seriously affected while the alternative sights and socio-economic packages offered to them are unacceptable.

It says seven beautiful waterfalls will be endangered while the impact on thedownstream water uses has apparently not been considered. Besides these problems the CWC is also angry that the project is being pushed through in its strongholds of Talawakele and surrounding areas without proper consultations or the consent of the party.

So the party organised a massive show of strength last Sunday with the mainattraction being the country's top Buddhist prelate, the Malwatte Mahanayake, who joined the protest campaign (See separate story for his comments).

The CWC is expressing concern that the Environmental Ministry also had approvedthe project though serious concerns had been raised by independent environmental and the scientific groups when the EIA was being done.

It said the Central Environmental Authority had recommended that alternative projectsbe looked into but it was ignored.

The CWC said one optional project was rejected on the basis of the presence ofCrystalline Limestone band and associated landslides. But those matters had not been considered in the geological evaluation report on Upper Kotmale. It warned that water leaks and other dangers that erupted in the Samanalawewa project might recur in Kotmale. But the official report had ignored or purposely overlooked these.

"The EIA assumption that there is no water usage downstream of St. Clair-one of the water falls which would be affected cannot be accepted and no quantitativeassessment has been done in support of the argument," the CWC report said.

The fears that Kotmale Oya will run dry particularly during the dry season, theclimatic changes which could affect tea plantations and vegetable cultivation thus affecting the country's economy and the impact on fauna and flora are among the other concerns in the report.

It says the issue whether the surrounding mountains could bear the pressure of thewater was another concern which has gone unanswered in the reports by the engineers.

The CWC which has vowed to continue its battle against the proposed project saysthat the CEB assertion that there is no environmental impact is not supported by new technical evidence.

The issue has turned into a political battle, after Power and Energy Minister, Karu Jayasuriya's son in law, Naveen Dissanayake-Deputy Plantations Minister entered the fray by calling on Mr. Thondaman to resign from the cabinet if he was going against the cabinet decision on the project.
Mr. Dissanayake son of former UNP frontliner and plantation king maker Gamini Diassanayake warned that another major power crisis might hit the country if Kotmale project was dropped.

When the dispute over Kotmale first emerged earlier this year Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe appointed an experts committee which recommended that the go ahead be given for the project with effective safeguards to prevent environmental damage.(See separate story on CEB assurances).
The Sunday Times learns that Japan which was to bankroll the Kotmale project is also concerned about the disputes and delays.

One report said the Japanese Embassy had warned that funds might be withdrawn if the government did not take a decision to go ahead with the project. But an embassy official on Friday declined to confirm or deny this report.

 

Dangerous power games with nature
Several independent environmental groups have warned of serious dangers in the proposed Kotmale project.

Green party leader Piyal Parakrama said the CEA had twice rejected the project and he wondered how it had now approved it without obtaining new data from experts.

He said the project's main areas Talawakele and Niyangangdora were known to be prone to landslides and had a high soil erosion rate while and could be a danger.

Environmental Education Society leader Jagath Gunawardena, a widely respected environmentalist also expressed deep concern for the well being of indigenous creatures and plants of the area.

He said their existance depended upon an environment created by the surrounding waterfalls termed the 'Spray Zone'. He warned that although there have been promises to let out water for 10 minutes every hour, the animals and reptiles may not be able to hold up for 50 minutes of dryness and would surely perish.

Mr. Gunawardena also referred to another important aspect 'flash floods'-caused by, heavy rainfall that would force the flood gates to be opened suddenly, with little or no warning.

"This would invariably result in the washing away of uninformed people and animals, who obviously don't heed signs. Likewise the 'drying up' of the water falls and rivers around would also be a serious threat to the environment," he said.

Mr. Gunawardena said the safety of the environment must be closely connected to an efficient electricity supply.

Mr. Gunawardena said he believed there was a need to diversify the electricity generating options. Instead of substituting hydro power with something like coal, which would depend on importing resources and adding to our heavy debt rate, he suggested using the country's resources like solar or wind power and being independent. He said that although installation costs of these substitute energies were high, on the long run, they would be much more cost effective and practical.

However, he pointed out that since the Emergency Power Supply Bill was passed last year, nothing could be done now on a legal basis.

Hemantha Vithange, Executive Director of the Environmental Foundation said he had questions on the economic feasibility of the project. "It will be carried out on a 1:1 cost benefit ratio thus, if the plant is unable to generate the total capacity needed to cover the costs, then the project would be running at a net loss," he said.

Mr. Vithanage said no response had been given to his query regarding the release of water from the water falls. "We have suggested an emergency gate, for water to be let out to the falls if necessary. But it has not been provided for," he complained.


Back to Top  Back to News  

Copyright © 2001 Wijeya Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Webmaster