Eligibility
criteria and new challenges
By Vimal Perera
At the time this article was written there was no official statement
issued by the Sri Lanka Rugby Football Union on the action taken
on the report of the disciplinary committee. Possibly by the time
of the article’s publication there may have been an official
statement released. The time taken for the disciplinary report as
well as the delay in making public the decision has led to many
versions being talked about. No doubt the issues at hand are of
serious consequence and the disciplinary committee had to give opportunity
for people to be heard.
The
council has to make decisions which will have far reaching affects
and therefore caution is necessary. Hopefully the suspense will
be over for all concerned and the sanctions will be made public.
The disciplinary sanctions when enforced will have an impact on
all and will be a deterrent to unruly participants of the game.
We all wait hoping the correct decision is made.
It
is discussed that the council may not entertain the continuance
of those involved and hold official status in various forms in the
union’s administration. There has to be some expectation from
those holding office to set an example to the followers. If they
are the cause and or have contributed to the disruption they can
no longer expect to be entertained by the host. In this sense the
responsibility is more on them to support the union or else they
should voluntarily step down.
Along
with the now infamous walk out one must also consider the need to
prevent the abuse of match officials in the coming season. The council
must have in place checks and balances in a system that will bring
to book offenders who resort to abuse.
There
is a need for a strategic program to reduce the abuse of match officials.
This will require an effort with the participation of the union.
the clubs management, coaches and referees. Education and emphasis
has an important role to play. The tournament rules and disciplinary
hand book must include and alert all concerned of the provisions
for dealing with abuse of match officials and the relevant regulations.
An
area of concern as voiced at the last ruby congress was “referee
recruitment and retention”. The need is now felt more than
before to ensure the implementation of the necessary areas of the
regulations of the IRB. The affecting of the regulation should be
through education, positive strategies and incentives.An interesting
aspect in the strategies for dealing with abuse of match officials
is the practice adopted in a particular country. A player receiving
a life sentence may receive a pardon if he referees for one year
on the pitch and attend training courses and also continue to referee
for a second year.
The
idea being that you will understand and appreciate the difficulty.
The sentences being lesser in Sri Lanka, may be they can take to
refereeing as a means of getting the sentence reduced. As reported
some players are to get a sentence of one year suspended for two
years. Why not referee and appeal for a reduced sentence. Who knows
a talented player like Nalaka may become a good referee. The challenge
is yours.
Another
area of the regulation that needs to be seriously looked and canvassed
with the sports ministry is the one on national representation.
“The eligibility to play for the national representative team”.
The eligibility criteria allows a player to represent if he was
born or one parent or grand parent was born or has completed thirty
six continuous months of residence immediately preceding the time
of playing. The impact of these requirements has to be understood.
Most of the countries in the Asian Region have taken advantage of
this rule. Japan.
Hong
Kong, Thailand, Malaysia, India etc have taken advantage. Sri Lankan
Rugby being on the rise, there is one easy way to go. That is down.
This is what we have to plan against and be strategic in trying
to achieve the objectives of the Union. There could be at least
one player who may be eligible to play for Sri Lanka as they get
ready to battle Hong Kong and China. He should also be available
to play in the Asiad. There have been inquires from children of
Sri Lankan Parents who have citizenship in other countries. This
may be the route to follow. Then there will also be the need to
look at the domestic structure if we are to accept the eligibility
criteria for national representation. The participants cannot be
myopic in their vision. They must look beyond if the achievements
are to be sustained and targets set are to be reached.
|