The SLMM
report that shocked the Govt.
|
Ulf Henriccson |
Following is the text of the latest SLMM report
which shocked the government and prompted an angry response from
it.
Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM) Implementation
of the Agreements Reached Between the Government of Sri Lanka and
the Liberation Tigers at the Geneva Talks the 22-23 February 2006
1. Preamble
The Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) and the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) met in Geneva 22-23 February 2006 for
talks on the Cease Fire Agreement (CFA). The GOSL and the LTTE committed
themselves to respect and uphold the CFA and reconfirmed their commitment
to fully cooperate with and respect the rulings of the Sri Lanka
Monitoring Mission (SLMM). The GOSL and the LTTE also pledged to
take all necessary measures to ensure that there will be no intimidation,
acts of violence, abductions or killings.
The LTTE committed themselves to take all necessary
measures to ensure that there will be no acts of violence against
the security forces and police. The GOSL on the other hand committed
itself to take all necessary measures in accordance with the CFA
to ensure that no armed group or person other than Government security
forces will carry arms or conduct armed operations in GOSL controlled
areas. GOSL and LTTE discussed all issues concerning the welfare
of children in the North East, including the recruitment of children.
It was agreed that SLMM will report on implementation
of the above agreements at the next session of talks in Geneva on
19-21 April 2006.
This report is an assessment based on information
collected by SLMM Monitors, including information on alleged and
confirmed violations of the CFA and the Parties compliance to SLMM
determinations with special attention to the defined period 24 February
- 28 May 2006.
A significant increase of complaints lodged by
the Parties was noted following the decision that SLMM would present
a report at the next round of talks. However, it should be mentioned
that it has been somewhat difficult for SLMM to inquire into what
comes across as being rather vague and general accusations with
only few concrete facts. SLMM has not yet been able to determine
all complaints recorded during the period as more time is needed
to finalize the inquiries in a professional manner and to allow
respective Parties to respond to the allegations. As such, this
report will analyze the situation in a broader perspective and recommend
measures which could strengthen the implementation of the CFA.
2. GOSL and LTTE overall commitment to
the CFA
The period started with a positive atmosphere
and steps were taken to further normalize the situation. The presence
of soldiers in town centers and the amount of checkpoint decreased
and the population living in the North and Northeast became much
more hopeful for the future.
Attempts were made to restart LTTE political activities
in GOSL controlled areas but too much distrust prevailed between
the Parties and so the GOSL was not willing to provide unlimited
access to LTTE political cadres as they feared that they would engage
in clandestine activities. LTTE also pushed for a resumption of
organized transport of LTTE cadres through GOSL controlled areas
including LTTE sea movements.
SLMM made several attempts to facilitate a meeting
in Kilinochchi between local LTTE leaders, a prerequisite set by
LTTE to ensure their participation in the Geneva II talks. However,
neither GOSL nor LTTE could reach an agreement on the transportation.
The transportation issue has now reached a complete deadlock, thus
postponing the Geneva II talks.
Although the level of violence decreased drastically
after the decision was taken to resume high-level talks, the situation
became very tense again following the assassination of the Trincomalee
District President of Tamil Peoples Forum on April 7, 2006. The
killing triggered a resumption of attacks against the GOSL forces,
which began with hand grenade and claymore mine attacks, notably
in the East. However, this soon escalated into more high profile
attacks such as the suicide attack against Commander of the Army
Lt. Gen Fonseka on 25 April, and the Sea Tiger attack on a SLN Dvora
on 11 May to mention but a few. GOSL showed restraint to begin with,
but as the seriousness of the incidents increased, so did GOSL's
response, which led to additional violence and suffering of the
civilian population.
As a result of the recent escalation in violence
the CFA has been put under heavy pressure and the parties' lack
of commitment is to be considered highly critical.
|
Security forces cordoning off Army Headquarters
after the attack on the Army Chief in April |
3 Intimidation, acts of violence, abductions
and killings by GOSL and LTTE
The level of intimidation and harassment of civilians
increased with the resumption of attacks against the security forces,
forcing people to seek shelter in schools, churches and temples.
These places of shelter have lately become a target as well, notably
in Trincomalee where the tension between civilian Tamils and Sinhalese
is particularly high following a bomb explosion in a market frequented
mostly by Sinhalese. The following riots killed at least 20, mostly
Tamils.
The fishing restrictions enforced by the GOSL
continued to impose a serious problem for the fisherman in the North
and Northeast. GOSL initially relaxed some of the limitations but
later imposed additional restriction as force protection measures.
Mr. Vigneswaran, the District President of Tamils
People Forum in Trincomalee, was assassinated outside the bank where
he worked on 7 April. The cold blooded killing of this prominent
member of the Tamil society close to major police and defence installations
raised serious doubts about GOSL capability to maintain law and
order.
There had only been few attacks against the security
forces or police during the initial six weeks after the Geneva Talks.
However following the abovementioned killing the attacks resumed
again on April 8, 2006 when a claymore mine targeted an Army truck
in Jaffna. This attack was followed by a series of mine and bomb
attacks mostly targeted at the SLA and SLN. The security forces
and police were attacked more than 141 times in the past seven weeks
resulting in at least 88 serviceman killed in action. The number
of attacks, the tactics used, the target and the geographic dimension
pointed out the LTTE as the most likely perpetrator. It does however
not rule out that some attacks might have been executed by some
other actors or that they could be cover operations. The attacks
were a very serious violation of the CFA.
LTTE forward defence localities or convoys in
the East were attacked a number of times throughout the period resulting
in the death of at least 19 LTTE cadres. Mid-April, five claymore
mine attacks in LTTE controlled Vanni killed five civilians and
two LTTE cadres. There was also extended exchange of fire between
SLA and LTTE across the zone of separation on several occasions.
At least 223 civilians were killed during the
reporting period: In Jaffna more than 43 civilian were assassinated
since April 10 in a virtual campaign of targeted killings. On several
occasions these killings took place within close vicinity of permanent
SF presence. Yet, they denied witnessing any of these killings.
The killings followed a pattern where gunmen approached the victim
at his house, called him out and shot him. In May two grave incidents
demonstrated a new development where gunmen target groups of civilians
instead of individuals.
On May 2, a group of gunmen entered a newspaper
office, shot dead the marketing manager and injured two others by
shooting randomly at the employees. On May 13, three gunmen entered
a private house and shot dead 8 civilians, including two children.
The fighting between, LTTE and the Karuna faction
in the Batticaloa District lead to at least 25 civilian casualties,
of which some were most likely Karuna cadres. On April 30, a Karuna
camp in Batticaloa district came under attack by LTTE. According
to LTTE, 20 Karuna cadres were killed and several injured. Ten wounded
Karuna Cadres were brought to a Governmental Hospital, but SLMM
were denied access to them by GOSL. Furthermore tension in Vavuniya,
partly believed to have been related to extortion and armed groups,
killed at least 21 civilians. Even though it is difficult to verify,
it is likely that many of the civilians killed were actually members
or supporters of either the LTTE or an armed group, thus directly
related to the conflict.
On April 23, a suicide bomber exploded herself
in the very near vicinity of the commander of the Sri Lanka Army
Lt. Gen Fonseka. The explosion took place within the army headquarters
in Colombo. Nine persons were killed and 27 wounded in this attack.
The incident clearly bears the hallmark of LTTE.
In retaliation, Sri Lanka Armed forces on April
25 and 26 attacked the LTTE-controlled area of Sampur and Ilakkantai,
by using air and artillery capabilities to strike military and political
targets of the LTTE.
Approximately 15 civilians were killed in these
actions. The number of LTTE cadres killed in these strikes is unknown
as LTTE has not revealed these findings to SLMM.
4 Presence and activities of armed groups
Continued attacks on LTTE forward defence localities
throughout the period showed that one or more armed groups were
actively engaged in offensive operations against the LTTE. SLMM
were able to verify three attacks in which the perpetrators either
came from or fled to GOSL-controlled areas; the attack on the LTTE
checkpoint in Vavunathivu on March 2, the attack on the LTTE checkpoint
in Poonagar, Mahindapura on March 23 and the attack on the LTTE
post in Panichchankerni on April 6.
The continued high number of assassination of
civilians, including LTTE supporters, in the East, as well as numerous
reports of harassment of civilians strongly indicated that armed
groups operate in that area.
SLMM received a large number of complaints relating
to assassinations. Harassments, extortions, assaults or abductions
where an armed group is the main suspect. Sighting of armed civilians
claiming to represent Karuna is often reported to SLMM and on March
28 SLMM monitors encountered 10-15 armed men in civilian clothes
operating in Valaichchenai, telling SLMM that they belong to the
Karuna faction. SLMM District Office in Batticaloa has also been
contacted by individuals claming to be Karuna members.
The only clearly identified armed group is the
Karuna faction and their political front TMVP who, contrary to the
GOSL commitment, became even more visible in GOSL controlled areas
in the East in March. SLMM has been in direct contact with Karuna
supportes and TMVP members and their presence and activities are
often confirmed by GOSL officials. SLMM was even advised by Ministry
of Defence to avoid movements in certain parts of GOSL-controlled
areas north of Batticaloa due to security reasons.
There are a number of indications that the GOSL
is actively supporting the Karuna group. Known Karuna supporters
have been seen moving to and from SLA camps, and it is evident that
the security forces and police in some areas are not taking action
to prevent armed elements from operating.
There were also strong indications that armed
groups started operating in and around Vavuniya. A number of civilians,
mainly Tamil businessmen, have been killed during the last months
and it is believed that the main reason behind these killings is
an attempt by an armed group to disturb LTTE activities in Vavuniya
and strengthen their own position. SLMM inquiries on incidents of
armed violence against civilians in Vavuniya strongly indicate that
SLA and Army Intelligence are supporting the armed groups in Vavuniya
district.
SLMM has not been able to confirm the LTTE allegations
that armed groups opposed to LTTE are operating in Jaffna nor the
presence of an active Muslim armed group. Neither can the LTTE claim,
that independent armed groups such as the "Peoples Force"
opposing GOSL have been behind attacks on the Security Forces, be
verified.
5 Child recruitment
Child recruitment and child abduction increased
significantly during March and April after it had been at a fairly
low level since September last year. The actual number is likely
to be much higher as many parents are unwilling to lodge a complaint
due to fear of retaliation.
While it is evident that LTTE was behind most
of the child recruiting as confirmed by several of the victims and
the LTTE, there were also indications that armed groups such as
the Karunas were abducting children. The reasons might be a perceived
need to increase the strength of the fighting formations as the
conflict escalates. In the East the struggle between the LTTE and
the Karuna faction might also lead to increased child recruitment
as they are both competing for the same group of potential new cadres.
SLMM is aware that some underage children freely
volunteer or leave their families due to economic reasons to join
LTTE. Nevertheless it still against international law to accept
them for training or use them for military purposes.
6. Other violations of the CFA
Both Parties are reinforcing their forward defence
localities following several incidents of crossfire exchange between
the parties, notably in Jaffna and in Vavunathivu, Batticaloa. In
Vavunathivu tenision seems to escalate following the killing of
a high ranking LTTE leader in the Zone of Separation on May 21.
LTTE had temporarily stopped building 250 metre-long and two-metre
high rampart, but resumed the construction work following the killing.
Furthermore they have constructed new positions
along their forward defence localities beside the A9 highway at
Omanthai crossing point even though it is a clear violation of the
CFA.
The situation along the LTTE-controlled coastline
in Trincomalee Bay was tense, mainly due to the fact that there
is no zone of separation along the coastlines. Armed LTTE cadres
moving and practising shooting near the beach alerted the Sri Lankan
Navy units deployed on the outlying islands and at sea. When SLN
approached the shore, LTTE Sea Tiger boats had been deployed, which
further raised the tension and led to exchange of fire between SLN
and LTTE. SLMM assisted to defuse the situation by negotiating an
agreement whereby the Parties would inform about any weapons practice
in advance.
LTTE Sea Tiger vessels manoeuvred far off the
coast in Mullaitivu for several days in April. They continued to
provoke the Sri Lankan Navy ships in the area by approaching in
fighting positions and firing with their weapons towards the SLN.
This was a clear intentional violation of the CFA, which culminated
on May 11, 2006 when LTTE attacked four SLN Fast Attack Craft in
the north-eastern waters, between Nagarkovil and Chalai .One SLN
craft was sunk by an LTTE suicide boat and 17 SLN sailors died.
It is assessed that this engagement was a show
of force that LTTE has a naval force to be reckoned with, and that
they 'control' the waters outside their coast.
7. GOSL and LTTE cooperation with SLMM
and compliance with SLMM rulings
The LTTE is still not providing full freedom of
movement to the SLMM. On numerous occasions SLMM was hindered to
approach the shores and suspected LTTE Sea Tiger bases. Although
the situation improved slightly, it remains a problem, especially
in areas where SLMM needs immediate access to inquire into alleged
violations. Such restrictions make already difficult tasks even
more challenging and add problems to SLMM's possibility to determine
on alleged violations.
SLMM also faces problems when patrolling in GOSL
area. Since SLMMs press release on April 29 regarding GOSL's involvement
in extrajudicial killing, SLMM has on several occasions been denied
access through checkpoints and exit/entry points. Security Forces
on the ground claim that they act upon orders from Colombo.
The LTTE has been quicker to provide inquiry-related
information requested by the SLMM since the last Geneva meeting.
Yet, the situation is still not satisfactory. It has also been very
difficult for SLMM monitors to get access to LTTE Sea Tigers and
Military Wing leaders.
As for the GOSL, both security forces and police
were restrictive when it came to SLMM inquiring into alleged activities
by armed groups, especially in Vavuniya. It has also been very difficult
for SLMM to inquire into the disappearance of four civilians following
the attack on a Navy bus in Pesalai, Mannar the 23 December 2005.
Sri Lankan Navy, who are accused of being behind the disappearance,
has been completely unwilling to cooperate with SLMM to bring clarity
to the case.
Both Parties were still very reluctant to comply
with SLMM rulings and even though SLMM continuously pointed out,
that for example a newly constructed position is a violation and
needs to be removed, no action was taken by either party.
Prior to the Sea Tiger attack on May 11, LTTE
forwarded three written warnings to SLMM, stating that SLMM should
refrain from boarding SLN vessels and that LTTE disclaims all responsibility
should an SLMM monitor be injured. SLMM perceived these warnings
as mere threats, not be given into. However, SLMM was forced to
cease all naval monitoring activities when Sea Tigers attacked an
SLN craft with a naval monitor onboard on May 11.
8. Conclusive remarks
The violence has not decreased during the reporting
period and serious violations of the CFA have been committed.
The GOSL's commitment to take all necessary measures
in accordance with the CFA to ensure that no armed group or person
other than Government security forces will carry arms or conduct
armed operations in GOSL controlled areas has not been implemented.
GOSL is responsible for maintaining law and order in all GOSL controlled
areas and this includes preventing operations by criminal, paramilitary
and other unofficial armed groups.
LTTE continued to recruit and abduct children
to strengthen their fighting capacity. LTTE must follow the CFA
and international law and stop this practice.
The Parties must fully cooperate with SLMM and
allow access to high security zones and other restricted areas.
The Parties also need to improve in regard to providing SLMM with
the information required for inquiries and complying with SLMM rulings.
LTTE's attempt to limit SLMM naval monitoring was a totally unacceptable
move to limit SLMM's mandate.
A number of violations by the parties might have
occurred due to lack of discipline and knowledge of the CFA, international
law and human rights. Both sides should therefore provide more training
on the above-mentioned subjects on all levels.
The Geneva meeting gave an opportunity to the
Parties to move forward and improve the situation. The initial positive
forward looking atmosphere was however quickly changed into reality
as the GOSL remained unwilling to implement all of its commitments
and instead denied even the mere presence of armed groups. In addition
the GOSL showed little willingness to accept requests by the LTTE
aimed at normalizing the situation. SLMM fears that the resumption
of attacks against the GOSL security forces was the LTTE's way of
putting pressure on the GOSL. The inability by the Parties to grasp
this opportunity unfortunately led to 150 persons losing their lives
and even more being injured or displaced in the violence that followed.
The parties must start looking at what measures
they can take to strengthen the CFA and improve the situation instead
of focusing on the faults done by their counterpart. Direct dialogue
on all levels should be re-established as a first confidence building
measures. SLMM also recommends that the Parties look closer to the
Vienna Document, 1999 to find well proven confidence and security
building measure which could be adapted to the situation in Sri
Lanka.
Finally, it should be emphasized that there are two basic fundamentals
which are necessary for a lasting peace and stability: A confident
legal system and full democratic control of the armed forces. These
basic fundamentals must be strengthened in Sri Lanka if the peace
process shall be successful.
Ulf Henricsson
Head of Mission
|