Great moments
in Robinhood country
Rohan Abeysinghe notes from England
Nottinghamshire one of the most beautiful counties
in England is also famous for its historic places! History seems
to associate very much with Nottingham in many ways! Not just the
history of the area but cricketing history too! The great Harold
Larwood from the bodyline era was big history maker. There were
many others. The list could go on. It was only fitting that Sri
Lanka too made history at these beautiful ground when England was
defeated in a test match.
Contrary to the doomsday predictions, Sri Lanka
was after all history at Nottingham! It was an absolute honour to
have England on their knees in the 3rd test, when the entire English
Media and most of their supporters were talking of three and a half
day test matches.
|
Chaminda Vaas has achieved unprecedented heights
for a Sri Lankan all rounder. |
As for the test match itself, I thought the turning
point of the match was the last two wickets in our first innings!
Adding over 90 runs from the precarious position Sri Lanka was in,
was absolutely fantastic. Chaminda Vaas has showed the world his
capability as a batsman. He was so focused and determined and it
was no surprise to see him remain unbeaten in both innings and also
end up facing the most number of balls in the series for Sri Lanka.
Now with over 300 wickets and almost 2500 runs, Chaminda Vaas has
achieved unprecedented heights for a Sri Lankan all rounder. That
is Sanath Jayasuriya included. With his advancing years, I feel
that Vaas could settle in beautifully in to a 3rd seamer’s
role and bat at no.7.
Geoff Boycott’s comments,
Back to the test match! It was only fascinating for me to watch
the likes of Geoff Boycott having to eat his own words after Sri
Lanka won. Working with him on Test Match Special Radio, you could
hear the familiar comment of Boycott saying, 8220gOh it is
a three and half a day test match. It is no good practice for the
Pakistan series. Sri Lanka is no match for England.8221h Having
to endure such comments for most of the series, it was nice that
the Lankan cricketers choose the 3rd test to let us have the opportunity
to get back at the rather critical English press and commentators.
I was delighted to hear Boycott winding up just before Sri Lanka
won saying, 8220grelieve me of this misery. Our batsmen just
don’t know how to play Muralithern.
Looking back on the test series I fully believe
that after the Lord’s game, Sri Lanka had an opportunity to
win the series! You may not agree but I can tell you, as that was
the ground situation. I suppose it was great to level the series
as the Lankans were not even expected to draw a game. But had they
not blundered with their selection and had they managed to apply
them better with the bat, I am very sure that Sri Lanka would have
defeated England.
Chaminda Vaas despite having a lean run with the
ball was more than useful down the order. Both Sangakkara and Jayawrdane
despite not having the best form were world class and respected.
Dilshan was consistent without a real big one. Young Kapugedara
finally lived up to expectations but has still a very long way ahead
of him. But for the rest it is back to the drawing board!
A win in the tests will not necessarily mean that
all is well. There is a plenty of work to be done and hopefully
will be done sooner before it gets out of hand. But as far as Sri
Lanka ‘s tour of England and the test series is concerned,
it is a highly creditable one which will after all be recorded in
the annals of test cricket and not the struggle the Lankans went
through.
|