Britain
to send special peace envoy
From Neville de Silva in London
Britain is expected to appoint a special
‘envoy’ shortly to engage in the Sri Lanka
peace process as it seeks to play a bigger role in the
search for a political solution, highly placed political
sources said.
Prime
Minister Tony Blair is expected to make this appointment
before long following talks he had last month with President
Mahinda Rajapaksa at his country residence “Chequers”,
the sources said.
Meanwhile the opposition Conservative
Party under the new leadership of David Cameron is preparing
a position paper on Sri Lanka, especially acts of violence
and terrorism by the LTTE, another political source
said.
The Conservative Party which is now
several points ahead in opinion polls is expected to
take a tough stand on terrorism, the funding of organisations
declared terrorist under British law and money laundering.
In the more-than-hour-long discussions
between President Rajapaksa and Prime Minister Blair,
mistakenly interpreted by some news media as sudden
and hurriedly-arranged, the stalled peace process and
issues arising out of the long-drawn out negotiations
had figured prominently.
Prime Minister Blair, who has played
a lead role in the “war against terror”,
is said to have considered positively a suggestion by
President Rajapaksa that Britain should play a
role in finding a solution to the
Sri Lankan conflict as it is equipped to do so.Given
its historical links with Sri Lanka and having largely
settled its own terrorist problem in Northern Ireland,
it was felt that the vast majority of Sri Lankans would
like to see Britain with its vast experience in the
field, more involved in the peace process.
While envisioning a role for itself,
London did not wish current facilitator Norway to think
that Britain was trying to “muscle in and knock
Oslo off its perch”, the sources said.
To avoid any misunderstanding, the
British foreign office is said to have informed beforehand
Norway’s special envoy Jon Hanssen-Bauer about
the meeting between Mr. Blair and Mr. Rajapaksa and
the possibility of Britain being more involved in the
peace process.
This happened when Mr. Hanssen-Bauer
was transiting London on his way back from Colombo in
August.
During the discussions with the Sri
Lanka President, Mr Blair had made the point that in
the negotiations on Northern Ireland, Sinn Fein, the
political wing of the IRA, was never accorded equal
status with the British Government, highly placed sources
said.
In Sri Lanka’s case Norway has
taken up the position, which it did even a few days
ago, that the Sri Lanka Government and the LTTE should
have parity of status.
Mr. Blair is also believed to have
taken serious note of reports of fund-raising for the
LTTE by various front organisations. His attention had
also been drawn to recent FBI arrests of US and Canadian
citizens for alleged arms buying missions and attempted
bribery of American officials in which a London-based
Tamil doctor was also detained and his house subsequently
searched.
Political analysts here say that the
hurried effort by Norway to schedule peace talks without
prior consultation with the Sri Lanka Government was
not only a pre-emptive move to force the Rajapaksa administration
into talking with the Tigers but also compel the two
parties into negotiations before Britain a key member
of the European Union, became involved.
Political insiders say that unlike
in the days of former British High Commissioners Linda
Duffield and Stephen Evans whose pro-LTTE sympathies
largely influenced British policy on Sri Lanka, the
tide has now turned with the Blair government much more
conscious of the dangers of terrorism and the presence
of supporters of banned organisations living in the
country.
With this change in thinking in British
political circles, Oslo is worried it would not be able
to have its way over Sri Lanka policy even though it
has the support of the EU Commissioner for External
Relations Benita Ferraro-Waldner whose opposition to
the EU ban on the LTTE has seriously dented her reputation
among European foreign policy analysts and terrorism
experts, political sources here said.
|