CBK hits back
in battle for defence
Sixteen months of deliberations on lop sided defence reforms and
three different draft laws, one after another, yet to reach Parliament
to deprive her powers over defence and security, President Chandrika
Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, swung into action last Friday to send
a strong message to the UNF Government - that she remains the Commander-in-Chief
of the armed forces.
She extended the term
of office of the Commander of the Army, Lieutenant General Lionel
Piyananda Balagalle until June 30, next year. He was due for retirement
on December 31, this year. That is not all. She appointed the Army
Chief, the senior most among the three serving commanders, as Chief
of Defence Staff (CDS). He will now head the Joint Operations Headquarters
(JOH).
The post of Chief of
Defence Staff, an exalted military office where a serving senior
officer co-ordinated the activities of the three services, particularly
on counter terrorist operations, fell vacant after the retirement
of Gen. Rohan de S. Daluwatte on June 4, 2002. In an unprecedented
and historic move, Defence Minister, Tilak Marapana, named Defence
Secretary Austin Fernando to act in the office of the CDS.
In that capacity, Mr.
Fernando who had little or no professional experience in defence
and security matters, presided over weekly conferences of service
chiefs and heads of state intelligence agencies. In the past, the
CDS and the service chiefs used these weekly conferences to assess
intelligence information that posed threats to national security
and agreed on collective action to be pursued. Thereafter they kept
the political leadership apprised.
With a ceasefire in
force, the fact that political compulsions slowed down or altogether
prevented the formulation of collective measures during Mr. Fernando's
tenure is no secret. Thereafter, on May 29, this year, Mr Fernando
directed Lt. Gen. Balagalle to co-ordinate the activities of the
three service commanders and the Inspector General of Police.
With Friday's appointment,
the Army Chief finds himself elevated from the role of a mere security
co-ordinator to be the most powerful serving military official in
Sri Lanka - the Chief of Defence Staff. In that capacity he can
issue lawful orders not only to the Army but to the Navy and Air
Force as well. This is the first time a serving commander has been
named as tri service head, a practice followed in many countries
including the United States and neighbouring India.
It was only last Thursday
Lt. Gen. Balagalle had returned to Sri Lanka from the United States.
He had travelled to Hawaii to take part in a conference of joint
chiefs of staff of pacific armies. Hawaii is home for the US Pacific
Command that covers 50 per cent of the earth's surface, 60 per cent
of the world's population, 43 countries, 20 territories/possessions
and ten US territories.
On Friday Lt. Gen. Balagalle
had taken part in a religious ceremony at Army Headquarters to mark
the 54th anniversary of the Sri Lanka Army. Barely an hour after
he had retired to his office, two letters arrived through a special
messenger from the President's Office. Both were good news to a
one time head of Army intelligence who was preparing to retire at
the year end after a near 38 year military career.
Both letters dated October
10, in Sinhala, were signed by the Secretary to the President, W.J.S.
Karunaratne. One titled Extension of Service said the President
had extended his term of office until June 30, 2004 acting in accordance
with the Pensions and Gratuities Regulations under the Army Act.
The second letter which
was only titled as Appointment said the President had invoked provisions
of the Prevention of Terrorism Act - a law which the UNF Government
promised the LTTE it would not enforce since being voted to power
in December 2001 - to appoint him with immediate effect as Chief
of Defence Staff in addition to his existing duties. The letter
said this appointment would be gazetted shortly.
By Friday evening, a
news release from the Presidential Secretariat broke the news of
the latest action by President Kumaratunga. It surprised both Prime
Minister, Ranil Wickremasinghe and his Defence Minister, Tilak Marapana.
Friday's appointments,
The Sunday Times learnt, were the direct outcome of a third attempt
by the UNF Government to formulate draft laws to deprive the President
of powers she now enjoys under the constitution as Commander-in-Chief.
The latest draft laws were reported exclusively in these columns
last week. Legal think tanks of the People's Alliance, The Sunday
Times learnt, have been poring over the provisions of the latest
draft since it became public (Situation Report -October 5). They
are examining the ramifications arising out of each provision and
what they perceive are the Government's motives behind them.
Besides the extension
of the tenure of office and the appointment of Lt. Gen. Balagalle
as Chief of Defence Staff, authoritative sources say, several other
"pre-emptive" measures to thwart what they call attempts
to erode the powers of the President and Commander-in-Chief, currently
enshrined in the Constitution, are in the offing in the coming weeks.
Another significant point, according to these sources, is President
Kumaratunga's decision to only grant six month extensions, where
felt necessary, instead of longer terms as previously done.
Once such a period is
over, she is to review whether further extended terms are required
under the circumstances. But a more significant move, the source
added, was a careful review of longer extended terms already granted
to senior officers. This is to ascertain whether such extensions
are now required in the best interests of the service concerned,
and if not, how they should be curtailed.
The UNF Government's
defence reforms have run into serious controversy ever since Defence
Minister, Tilak Marapana, signed a decree on July 5, 2002 appointing
a three member Committee - Defence Secretary, Austin Fernando (Chairman),
Treasury Secretary Charitha Ratwatte and one time Army Commander,
Lt. Gen. Denis Perera. The decree issued to the Committee itself
has been flawed. It called upon the trio to "examine and report
on the stated matters, by the dates given having considered written
and/or verbal submission from service personnel where applicable
and considered necessary."
The scope of the Committee
was restricted over a subject of defence reforms that affected practically
every citizen of Sri Lanka. There was no broad based consultation
with the public at large or the rank and file of the armed services
except for selected sections of officers, both serving and retired.
This again, is in addition to selected service oriented organisations
being consulted.
A more ironical situation
came about due to the inability of both Mr. Fernando and Mr. Ratwatte
to take part regularly in the sittings of the Committee. This was
in view of their commitment to duties that centred around their
substantive official positions. The result - Lt. Gen. Denis Perera,
who retired long before the outbreak or exacerbation of the separatist
war and thus had no first hand knowledge of what went on having
to work on his own in what came to be called a “one man show”.
In the past months, he has been undertaking official visits to military
installations all by himself though the visit has been termed as
one from the Defence Review Committee.
The fact that his role
has earned the ire of President Kumaratunga became public when she
replied Prime Minister, Ranil Wickremasinghe, early this week over
the ongoing exchange of letters concerning the Tiger guerrilla build
up in the Trincomalee district. Here is the relevant reference:
"The only programme
in the sphere of Defence that I am aware of, which you have constantly
tried to implement without success, is the one where you and your
Minister of Defence and a so-called Defence Review Committee headed
by a long retired general who has never fought a war, is to attempt
to grab the powers of the Executive Head of State and Commander
in Chief with regard to Defence matters."
It is now Premier Wickremasinghe's
turn to respond to this letter. But a source close to him says he
is not interested in continuing "this acrimonious exchange
of correspondence." He is to write a "short but firm"
reply and let the matter rest, says the source. A wise move indeed
since the Premier has a number of important political issues to
focus on.
That apart, President
Kumaratunga's terse observation about defence reforms makes one
point very clear - if it has not received broad based public consultation
including those within the military establishment, it does not have
the endorsement of the People's Alliance, the country's main opposition.
This only means that
if and when there is a change of Government, all the paper work
of this controversial committee will end up in one place - the waste
paper basket or in an incinerator. Is this ongoing effort therefore
not a colossal waste of the tax payer's money? Foreign Governments,
particularly the United Kingdom which doled out funds and lent even
experts to this controversial exercise, will also have several questions
to answer.
Through their actions,
by not ensuring checks and balances they have involved themselves
in the country's partisan political battles. The consequences are
now becoming clearer. Have they not, therefore, wittingly or unwittingly,
contributing to the instability of a country by not ensuring the
proper, declared ideals of defence reforms have been executed? Is
it not their moral responsibility to have ensured there were checks
and balances?
Ever since the deliberations
of the Defence Review Committee began, The Sunday Times has made
a series of exclusive disclosures. When the first chapter of the
Committee's recommendations, which related to Higher Defence Control
was made public (Situation Report - September 29, 2002), a draft
Joint Chiefs of Staff Act (Situation Report - October 27,2002) was
formulated in double quick time.
This was even before
the armed forces commanders were called upon to make their observations.
Thereafter, a draft Higher Defence Control Act was made public by
The Sunday Times (Situation Report - June 29,2003). The provisions
of this draft act drew protests from armed forces commanders (Situation
Report - July 6,2003) and that saw the birth of the latest draft
revealed exclusively in these columns last week.
According to the latest
draft, which the Government's legal advisers say are in accordance
with the Constitution, the UNF Government wants to set up a Defence
Board presided by the Minister of Defence to be responsible for
(1) the consideration and advice on matters in relation to Defence
Management (2) and supervise the implementation of defence policy.
The cumulative effect
of the draft law is the fact that the Cabinet will run the country's
defence establishment. A Security Council is to exercise powers
and functions "as are determined by the Cabinet of Ministers."
Imagine a crisis situation where time and prompt action are essential
requirements in the interests of national security. It will not
be the armed forces commanders who will sit together and plan out
strategy at once. It has to start with Cabinet decisions.
Like deciding on procurements,
a public secret where corrupt practices continue to flourish unimpeded,
decisions on national security will also be subject to lobbying,
canvassing and most of all, influenced by stacks of dollars or rupees.
If that is bad enough, one will not be surprised when the day arrives
where open (perhaps world-wide) tenders are called for advice before
decisions on national security are made. Bidding can become a money
spinner.
What does the latest
draft law say about the equivalent of the Chief of Defence Staff,
the post of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee? Here
it is: "The Chairman shall not whilst serving as Chairman exercise
military command over the Committee or any one of the armed forces."
In other words, a military officer (without doubt someone who is
senior-most in his career) called upon to be Chairman of JCS will
just be a figure head. Where will the orders come from? Who will
issue them?
The further the so-called
Defence Review Committee continues to function, the more irritants
it will cause to the already shaky world of co-habitation. Would
it not be better for Premier Wickremasinghe to call off these reforms,
save the colossal expenditure over the “one man show”and
think of it once the biggest issue before the country - the peace
process - is accomplished. He can then focus on a Government-Opposition
joint effort at defence reforms where the civil society will also
participate. That will indeed be truly a reform.
This way, at least the
nation's security establishment will not face any division - the
same threat the nation is facing over the ongoing UNF Government's
peace dialogue with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).The
UNF Leadership must act before it is too late.
Extension and
the chain reaction
Here is a line
up of the chain command of the Sri Lanka Army sequel to Friday's
extension of the tenure of office of Commander, Lt. Gen. Lionel
Balagalle.
Due to retire on December 31, this year, President Chandrika Bandaranaike
Kumaratunga, Commander-in-Chief, has extended his term until June
30, 2004, a period of six months.
Consequently, Major
General Lohan Gunawardena, Chief of Staff, who was tipped to become
the next Army Commander, will have to retire on November 22, 2003.
This is when he reaches 55 years.
Maj. Gen. Gunawardena,
reached his maximum mandatory period of three years in the rank
of Major General and was due for retirement on December 4, 2000.
He was granted two annual extensions. Thereafter, Defence Minister
Tilak Marapana, issued a gazette notification making provision for
Majors General to continue to serve in their rank until they reach
55 years, the age of retirement.
Last week, Mr. Marapana
issued another gazette notification extending this exemption to
ranks equivalent to Majors General in the Navy and the Air Force.
Last year, Mr. Marapana wrote to President Kumaratunga recommending
the appointment of Maj. Gen. Gunawardena as Army Commander. He had
recommended Lt. Gen. Balagalle to a post of Chairman, Joint Chiefs
of Staff Committee - a position the UNF Government sought to create
through their controversial defence reforms. However, this recommendation
was not given effect.
The next in line to
Maj. Gen. Gunawardena, Deputy Chief of Staff, Major General Shantha
Kottegoda, assumed office last Wednesday. He reaches his age of
retirement on November 5, 2004.
Others in the senior
chain of command include Major General Chula Seneviratne, Director
General - General Staff (DGGS). He reaches his age of retirement
on December 9, 2004. Major General Sarath Fonseka, Security Forces
Commander, Jaffna. Reaches retirement age on December 17, 2005.
Major General Susil Chandrapala,
Security Forces Commander, Wanni. Reaches retirement age on October
29, 2005. Major General Nanda Mallawaratchchi, Security Forces Commander,
East. Reaches age of retirement on August 2, 2006.
Navy tightens
security in deep seas off Trinco
The Eastern Naval Area Headquarters in Trincomalee has intensified
patrols in the north-eastern deep seas following reports of possible
attempts by Tiger guerrilla vessels to smuggle in military hardware.
For obvious reasons
measures put into effect cannot be elaborated on. However, it could
be said that the Navy's efforts are being supplemented by the Air
Force. Heavily equipped SLAF Beechcraft reconnaissance planes have
been conducting regular flights to monitor movement of ships in
the deep seas off the shores between Mullaitivu and Batticaloa.
These measures come
in the backdrop of exclusive revelations in The Sunday Times last
week about a guerrilla cadre on board an LTTE arms vessel committing
suicide whilst in an Indonesian port.
The vessel has been
identified as "Agasthi". The Sunday Times reported that
a guerrilla cadre committed suicide after biting a cyanide capsule.
Both the body of the dead guerrilla cadre as well as the vessel
had been released. The Sunday Times learnt that the dead guerrilla
had been in possession of a forged Bangladeshi passport carrying
a Muslim name. According to authoritative sources, large sums of
money is said to have been used to secure the release of the body
of the dead cadre and the ship.
The Sunday Times learnt
that local authorities in Colombo have now sought the help of friendly
foreign intelligence agencies over this matter. As naval patrols
were intensified, on Wednesday Parliament was debating the security
situation in the east, particularly the Trincomalee district.
It was The Sunday Times
(Situation Report - August 3) that exclusively revealed how the
LTTE camp at Manirasakulam, now set to remain despite all protests,
is endemic of the gradual transformation of the landscape around
Trincomalee.
The report said Tiger
guerrillas have opened up new military camps, re-occupied ones they
abandoned and set up a string of satellite camps around bases that
existed. The map accompanying the report told the story of this
changing environment. Newly recruited cadres have been trained and
moved in. New weaponry and communications equipment have been widely
distributed, the report revealed.
During last Wednesday's
debate in Parliament, TULF Parliamentarian R. Sampanthan (Trincomalee
District) who was making reference to The Sunday Times report said
"sometimes this investigative journalism transgresses the limit
of investigative journalism and tends to become somewhat imaginative
journalism. It is also packaged and presented to the public at large
as investigative journalism.
The respect of the reports
pertaining to the so-called camps opened up by the LTTE after the
signing of the Ceasefire Agreement, no source is quoted by these
investigative journalists. They have not gone there. They have not
seen for themselves. They have not discovered the truth themselves.
It is just there ipse dixit."
Remarks from Mr. Sampanthan
drew a sharp retort from Lakshman Kadirgamar, former Foreign Minister
and now senior international affairs advisor to the President. He
said "Mr. Sampanthan of today is not the Sampanthan of yesterday.
Today his dream world is peopled by romantic heroes. Only two years
ago he was a very moderate, objective, well balanced person who
took a comprehensive view of the country's interests.
Today when he speaks
he exhibits a kind of hysterical admiration for the LTTE and so
passionately champions their cause. That it seems to me that he
has abandoned objectivity completely - which is sad. It is sad in
the case of any person if that happens. It is not a question of
not knowing what the imperatives are but it is sad because the contribution
that Mr. Sampanthan and others made, particularly him, over the
years to the debates of this House".
Defence Minister, Tilak
Marapana, in his speech confirmed the revelations made in The Sunday
Times (Situation report of August 3). Here are excerpts from what
he said: "When we entered into a ceasefire, our aim was to
solve the problems we had with the LTTE not by the use of force
but through negotiations.
If that is our aim,
then we must try to give the peace process a genuine chance without
once again dragging the country to a burdensome war. This is not
to say that we should tolerate anything and everything and allow
the LTTE to get stronger and stronger and be suddenly surprised
by an attack which we are unable to withstand. We have to act judiciously,
be mindful all the while and take every new factor into consideration
to face any eventuality in the future.
"Sir, it is true
that the LTTE strength in the areas surrounding the Trincomalee
harbour have increased during the cease-fire period. I do perceive
this as an increased threat. "What happened with the cease-fire
was that army did not move about from their camps into the area
south of the harbour.
We claim this area to
be under our control but we have, since the withdrawal of several
camps and troops from this area in 1995, not been able to effectively
dominate this area. The LTTE has taken advantage of this and increased
their presence in this area. Mr. Deputy Chairman, to my mind the
significance is not the number of camps in which this increased
strength are stationed. What is important is the fact that the LTTE
strength in this area has nearly doubled since the time of the cease-fire.
"We know that during
the last 18 months or so gradually the LTTE have been coming into
this area. They have been roaming in this area for a long time.
They have gradually stationed themselves in this area. So, to our
mind what is important is not that there are 12 or 13 camps but
we consider the larger presence of the LTTE in the area as the threat
that we have to contend with if some unfortunate incident is to
happen. We have taken this into consideration.
That is in preparation
of our military strategies to defend the harbour and the civilian
population in this area as well as for the eventual offensive against
the LTTE should the occasion arise.
"We know that.
We are not oblivious to the obvious. We know that the LTTE cadres
have gradually crept into this area and they have established a
stronger foothold. We are concerned about the increased strength
in the LTTE cadre and we have taken this all important factor into
consideration and our strategies are so structured to meet any eventuality.
"Heavy artillery
has been in this area. The Hon. Kadirgamar rightly mentioned that
the most important factor, where the security of the harbour is
concerned, is the presence of this artillery. I assure this House
that it is not as though the Government and the forces have blissfully
permitted the enemy to surround us without making adequate preparation
to counter any threat.
"I certainly do
not subscribe to that view that along with the peace process one
cannot also strengthen our security. I believe that the two must
go parallel to one another and that is always our thinking".