Judge vacates conviction
of late Enron founder Kenneth Lay
Associated Press Writer - HOUSTON
A federal judge vacated the conviction of Enron's
late founder Kenneth Lay, wiping out a jury's verdict that he committed
fraud and conspiracy in one of the biggest corporate scandals in
U.S. history.
Lay was convicted of 10 counts of fraud, conspiracy
and lying to banks in two separate cases on May 25. Enron's collapse
in 2001 wiped out thousands of jobs, more than $60 billion (euro47.91
billion) in market value and more than $2 billion (euro1.6 billion)
in pension plans.
Lay died of heart disease July 5 while vacationing
with his wife, Linda, in Aspen, Colorado.
U.S. District Judge Sim Lake, in a ruling Tuesday,
agreed with Lay's lawyers that his death required that his conviction
be erased and his indictment dismissed. They cited a 2004 ruling
from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that found that a defendant's
death pending appeal extinguished his entire case because he had
not had a full opportunity to challenge the conviction and the government
shouldn't be able to punish a dead defendant or his estate.
''On behalf of his estate, I'm really quite pleased
with the ruling and glad this brings to a close the criminal proceeding
against Mr. Lay,'' said Samuel Buffone, the attorney for Lay's estate.
''The judge engaged in a fair and reasoned application of 5th Circuit
law.''
Tuesday's ruling thwarts the government's bid
to seek $43.5 million (euro34.73 million) prosecutors allege Lay
took by participating in Enron's fraud. The government could still
pursue those claims in civil court, but they would have to compete
with any other litigants also pursuing Lay's estate.
''Today's ruling does not change the fact that
Mr. Lay was found guilty after a four-month jury trial and a separate
bench trial,'' said Bryan Sierra, a Department of Justice spokesman.
''We will continue to pursue all remedies available for restitution
on behalf of the victims of the fraud at Enron.''
In his ruling, Lake also denied a request from
Russell Butler, a Maryland crime victims attorney who lost $8,000
(euro6,390) in Enron's collapse. He had asked for an order of restitution
based on Lay's conviction, said his attorney, Keli Luther, with
the Crime Victims Legal Assistance Project in Arizona.
Luther said Lake's ruling was ''unfair for victims
that have been left penniless by Mr. Lay's actions.''
''With this ruling, the criminal case is over.
It doesn't end the civil case or the ability of anyone to file or
pursue a civil case against the estate,'' Buffone said.
Kelly Kimberly, spokeswoman for Lay's family,
declined comment, referring reporters to Buffone.
Prosecutors offered no counter legal argument
in the case, but asked Lake to hold off on a ruling until next week
so Congress could consider legislation from the Justice Department
that changes current federal law regarding the abatement of criminal
convictions. Congress recessed for the elections without considering
the legislation.
In their motion to Lake last month, prosecutors
Sean Berkowitz and John Hueston wrote that certain provisions of
the proposed legislation would apply to Lay's case, including ''that
the death of a defendant charged with a criminal offense shall not
be the basis for abating or otherwise invalidating either a verdict
returned or the underlying indictment.''
''Although the United States argues that applicable
law might change at some unknown future date, the court is bound
to follow Fifth Circuit precedent,'' Lake wrote in his ruling.
Enron, once the nation's seventh-largest company,
crumbled into bankruptcy proceedings in December 2001 when years
of accounting tricks could no longer hide billions in debt or make
failing ventures appear profitable.
Lay's co-defendant, former Enron chief executive
Jeffrey Skilling, is scheduled to be sentenced on Monday.
|