Sri Lankans plan demo
outside C’wealth Society
From Neville de Silva in London
Sri Lankans from all communities are planning
to demonstrate outside the Royal Commonwealth Society for pandering
to the LTTE, an organisation banned in the UK and in the European
Union.
The organisers say that unless the RCS announces
early its list of panellists for a discussion it has promoted on
Sri Lanka scheduled for October 31, they will launch their protest
against the society's perceived pro-LTTE bias.
Earlier the Sri Lanka High Commission had lodged
a strong protest after the RCS announced the meeting listing the
editor of the pro-LTTE Tamil Guardian as one of the main participants,
the only confirmed speaker at the time.
After word got around of the proposed discussion
among ‘young stakeholders’ as it was initially dubbed
by the RCS which is one of the institutions linked to the Commonwealth
Secretariat, a large number of Sri Lankans representing all ethnic
groups petitioned the society for listing the editor of the Tamil
Guardian as a participant who they claimed was a well-known LTTE
supporter.Another speaker tentatively listed was Nishan de Mel,
unknown to the vast majority of those representing various Sri Lankan
associations here.
Surprised by the heap of protests from the Sri
Lankan community and the High Commission, RCS back-tracked and has
now dropped the Tamil Guardian editor from the panel but is still
not disclosing the list of participants, according to information
received by The Sunday Times from those planning the demo.
But organisers fear that other well-known LTTE
supporters will end up on the panel or the meeting will be disrupted
by unruly behaviour as is said to have happened recently at an Amnesty
International sponsored gathering to launch a human rights report.
Asked by The Sunday Times, the head of public
affairs of RCS Miles Giljam admitted there had been numerous protests
about the participation of the Tamil Guardian and that a new panel
is being constituted.
"We are still trying to find a panel that
would be balanced," Mr. Giljam said. Mr. Giljam's comment was
dismissed by one of the protestors who said the RCS was deliberately
delaying announcing the names of the panellists giving little time
for objections to be raised.
"This is a deliberate attempt to force a
one-sided panel on the public. If the RCS organisers now say they
are trying to select a balanced panel that will present all views
on the Sri Lanka situation, then it is a tacit admission that the
previous panel arbitrarily picked by the society was not balanced.
So we were not wrong in objecting to the pro-LTTE bias shown by
the RCS in picking a strong supporter of a banned organisation and
putting some other nonentities to present other sides of the case."
"If we are not informed early this week about
the panel, then we will go ahead with our demonstration on the day
of the meeting. The RCS cannot be allowed to get away with pandering
to the Tigers. Sri Lanka is a member of the Commonwealth and of
the RCS. The society cannot be allowed to act as though this was
its private property," he said.
Earlier the Sri Lanka High Commission had written
to the head of RCS Stuart Mole protesting at the manner in which
the High Commissioner had been cast in a role where she was expected
merely to sum up the discussion without even extending the courtesy
of first sounding her out on whether she would be willing to do
so.
|