Exposing industry tactics on tobacco and nicotine products

Dr. Daniel Niranjan

The global tobacco epidemic continues to pose a substantial public health challenge, exacerbated by the strategic and evolving tactics employed by the tobacco and nicotine industry. This article provides a comprehensive examination of the industry's manipulative strategies designed to attract new users, particularly youth, perpetuate nicotine addiction, and undermine public health policies.

Through analysis of marketing techniques, product innovation, misinformation campaigns, and interference in policy-making, unravel the covert mechanisms used by tobacco companies. The findings underscore the urgent need for reinforced regulatory frameworks, public awareness initiatives, and international cooperation to combat industry influence and safeguard global health.

The tobacco industry has long been associated with deceptive practices aimed at maximising profits at the expense of public health. Despite global efforts to reduce tobacco use through frameworks such as the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the industry continuously adapts its tactics to evade regulation and attract new consumers. This article explores the multifaceted approaches used by the tobacco and nicotine industry, focusing on the ways in which they mask the appeal of harmful products under the guise of innovation, harm reduction, and lifestyle enhancement.

Historically, the tobacco industry has engaged in a wide range of unethical practices, including manipulating scientific research, denying the health risks of smoking, and targeting vulnerable populations. Internal documents released through litigation have exposed deliberate strategies to maintain consumer dependence and obstruct regulatory measures. These precedents laid the foundation for the modern tactics employed by the industry. Youth remain a primary target for the tobacco industry due to their susceptibility to marketing and potential for long-term addiction. Companies employ colourful packaging, appealing flavours, and trendy imagery to make nicotine products attractive to younger demographics. Social media influencers and covert online campaigns further amplify product visibility among youth.

Tobacco companies rebrand themselves as wellness-oriented, socially responsible entities through corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns and sponsorships. By associating their products with freedom, success, and rebellion, they create a false narrative that masks the harmful nature of nicotine consumption. The introduction of flavoured tobacco and nicotine products, including menthol, fruit, and candy variants, has significantly increased their appeal, particularly among youth. Product diversification into e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products (HTPs), and nicotine pouches has further enabled the industry to evade traditional tobacco regulations.

Tobacco companies exploit regulatory gaps by launching products that fall outside existing legislation, using ambiguous language and novel delivery systems. This includes marketing e-cigarettes as smoking cessation aids without sufficient evidence and introducing synthetic nicotine to circumvent tobacco product definitions. The industry invests heavily in lobbying to influence policy decisions, delay implementation of tobacco control measures, and secure favourable regulations. This often involves funding political campaigns, forming front groups, and engaging in legal challenges against public health legislation. Astroturfing involves the creation of fake grassroots organisations that appear to support consumer freedom while secretly advancing industry interests. These groups oppose tobacco control policies and disseminate misleading information to sway public opinion and policy-making.

Tobacco companies fund biased research, misrepresent scientific data, and create doubt about the risks of tobacco and nicotine products. By promoting industry-sponsored studies, they attempt to influence scientific discourse and undermine evidence-based health warnings. The meteoric rise of JUUL Labs highlights how marketing strategies targeting youth, including the use of flavours and influencer campaigns, can lead to a public health crisis. Regulatory responses and lawsuits have since attempted to curb the company’s practices.

The rapid adoption of heated tobacco products in Japan and South Korea illustrates how the industry capitalises on harm reduction narratives while downplaying health risks and regulatory gaps. Industry-funded research and aggressive marketing have facilitated widespread uptake. In several African countries, the tobacco industry has exploited weak governance and limited regulatory capacity to expand its market, often targeting youth and low-income populations with low-cost products and misleading promotions.

Countries must reinforce FCTC guidelines, particularly Articles 5.3 (protecting policies from industry interference) and 13 (comprehensive bans on advertising). Full implementation of these measures can significantly reduce industry influence. Banning flavoured tobacco and nicotine products and regulating all nicotine delivery systems under a unified framework are essential steps. This includes controlling ingredients, packaging, labelling, and marketing practices. Educating the public about the tactics used by the tobacco industry can reduce the appeal of nicotine products. Campaigns should focus on youth education, media literacy, and exposing industry manipulation. Further establishing independent monitoring bodies to track industry activities, enforce transparency in political donations, and audit industry-funded research will enhance accountability and limit undue influence.

The tobacco and nicotine industry continues to evolve, employing sophisticated and covert tactics to sustain profitability at the cost of global health. By unmasking these tactics and strengthening regulatory, educational, and policy-based countermeasures, public health stakeholders can protect populations from nicotine addiction and related harms. International collaboration and vigilance remain essential to overcoming the ongoing threat posed by tobacco industry interference.

Quit smoking for your loved one.