• Last Update 2024-03-29 09:48:00

Guidelines to prevent deaths of persons in Police custody due

News

The Supreme Court on Friday (24) issued notice to Inspector General of Police (IGP) Chandana Wickramaratne to appear in court on April 3 for failing to submit guidelines, elaborating the steps that should be taken by police officers to avoid ‘encounter deaths’ of suspects while in police custody.

The three-judge bench comprising Justices S. Thurairaja, PC, A.H.M.D. Nawaz and Achala Wengappuli issued notice on the IGP after the Attorney General’s Department informed the Court that police had failed to submit the guidelines despite being ordered to do so.

The IGP had earlier been ordered to submit the guidelines following a ruling into a Fundamental Rights Petition filed by Mohammed Rashid Fathima Sharmila on behalf of her deceased husband, who had died in police custody.

The Petitioner had cited seven Respondents, including five officers of the Slave Island Police including its Officer-in-Charge (OIC), the Inspector General of Police (IGP) and the Attorney General.

The Petitioner had alleged that her husband, Mohammed Nizar Mohammed, had been taken into custody by the Slave Island Police on September 2, 2008 on charges of allegedly possessing a live hand grenade, murder, attempted murder, and robbery. He was shot dead the following morning.

In the course of the evidence led at the Inquest before the Magistrate, it had been revealed that the deceased had been traveling in a vehicle with eight police officers when he allegedly attempted to seize the weapon of one of them and shoot Police Sergeant Karunathilake, who is the 3rd Respondent in the case. Sergeant Karunathilake had then shot the deceased twice, once in the chest and once in the abdomen, allegedly exercising his right of private defence. 

Even assuming that the deceased did make an attempt to escape, there were eight trained policemen in the vehicle, with six of them being armed. They could easily have been able to overpower the deceased by inflicting lesser harm than killing him. As such, the 3rd Respondent is seen to have acted in excess of self-defence, the bench comprising Justices Buwaneka Aluwihare, PC, E.A.G.R. Amarasekara and Kumudini Wickramasinghe observed.

The Court has stressed that Respondents’ version of the events is contradictory, improbable and thus must be refuted.  

The Court ordered the State to pay Rs.250, 000 as compensation to the Petitioner. It also ordered the three police officers named as the1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents to pay Rs.25, 000/- each to the Petitioner. A Police Inspector and the OIC of the Slave Island Police, who were the 4th and 5th Respondent respectively, were ordered to pay Rs. 200,000/- each to the petitioner. The Court directed that all payments by the respondents be paid personally. 

“The incident relevant to this application had taken place in 2008, however, this court observes that instances of death of suspects in police custody are continuing to happen, even today. It appears that the hierarchy of the administration had paid scant attention to arrest this trend which does not augur well for the law enforcement and the rule of law,” the Court further observed.

Accordingly, the Court directed the IGP to formulate, issue and implement, guidelines to the police, elaborating the steps that should be taken by each officer to avoid ‘encounter deaths’ of this nature in the future.

M.A. Sumanthiran, PC with Divya Mascaranghe appeared for the Petitioner.  Deputy Solicitor General Madhawa Tennakoon appeared for the Respondents. 

By Ranjith Padmasiri

You can share this post!

Comments
  • Still No Comments Posted.

Leave Comments